Dataset Information

Significant Published Articles for Pharmacy Nutrition Support Practice in 2019.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this article is to assist the pharmacist engaged in nutrition support therapy in staying current with pertinent literature. Methods: Several clinical pharmacists engaged in nutrition support therapy compiled a list of articles published in 2019 considered important to their clinical practice. The citation list was compiled into a single spreadsheet where the author participants were asked to assess whether the article was considered important to nutrition support pharmacy practice. A culled list of publications was then identified whereby at least 5 out of the 8 author participants considered the paper to be important. Guideline and consensus papers from professional organizations, important to practice but not ranked, were also included. Results: A total of 111 articles were identified; 6 from the primary literature were voted by the group to be of high importance. An additional 9 organizational guidelines, position, recommendation, or consensus papers were also identified. The top-ranked articles from the primary literature were summarized and a narrative regarding its implications to pharmacy nutrition support practice were provided. Conclusion: We recommend that pharmacists engaged in nutrition support therapy be familiar with these articles as it pertains to their practice.

SUBMITTER: Dickerson RN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7672664 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Significant Published Articles for Pharmacy Nutrition Support Practice in 2019.

Dickerson Roland N RN Bingham Angela L AL Canada Todd W TW N Chan Lingtak L Cober M Petrea MP V Cogle Sarah S Tucker Anne M AM Kumpf Vanessa J VJ

Hospital pharmacy 20200617 6

The purpose of this article is to assist the pharmacist engaged in nutrition support therapy in staying current with pertinent literature. <b>Methods:</b> Several clinical pharmacists engaged in nutrition support therapy compiled a list of articles published in 2019 considered important to their clinical practice. The citation list was compiled into a single spreadsheet where the author participants were asked to assess whether the article was considered important to nutrition support pharmacy p ...[more]

PMID: 33245726

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundReproducibility is a central tenant of research. We aimed to synthesize the literature on reproducibility and describe its epidemiological characteristics, including how reproducibility is defined and assessed. We also aimed to determine and compare estimates for reproducibility across different fields.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review to identify English language replication studies published between 2018 and 2019 in economics, education, psychology, health sciences, and biomedicine. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature - CINAHL, Education Source via EBSCOHost, ERIC, EconPapers, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS), and EconLit. Documents retrieved were screened in duplicate against our inclusion criteria. We extracted year of publication, number of authors, country of affiliation of the corresponding author, and whether the study was funded. For the individual replication studies, we recorded whether a registered protocol for the replication study was used, whether there was contact between the reproducing team and the original authors, what study design was used, and what the primary outcome was. Finally, we recorded how reproducibilty was defined by the authors, and whether the assessed study(ies) successfully reproduced based on this definition. Extraction was done by a single reviewer and quality controlled by a second reviewer.ResultsOur search identified 11,224 unique documents, of which 47 were included in this review. Most studies were related to either psychology (48.6%) or health sciences (23.7%). Among these 47 documents, 36 described a single reproducibility study while the remaining 11 reported at least two reproducibility studies in the same paper. Less than the half of the studies referred to a registered protocol. There was variability in the definitions of reproduciblity success. In total, across the 47 documents 177 studies were reported. Based on the definition used by the author of each study, 95 of 177 (53.7%) studies reproduced.ConclusionsThis study gives an overview of research across five disciplines that explicitly set out to reproduce previous research. Such reproducibility studies are extremely scarce, the definition of a successfully reproduced study is ambiguous, and the reproducibility rate is overall modest.FundingNo external funding was received for this work.

Dataset Information

Significant Published Articles for Pharmacy Nutrition Support Practice in 2019.

Publications

Significant Published Articles for Pharmacy Nutrition Support Practice in 2019.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets