Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) - A new normal for small cell lung cancer?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Pereira I
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7695539 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) - A new normal for small cell lung cancer?
Pereira Ian I Slotman Ben B Rusthoven Chad G CG Katz Matthew S MS Simcock Richard R Saeed Hina H
Clinical and translational radiation oncology 20200905
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background and purposePatients with locally advanced oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma have suboptimal outcomes with standard chemoradiation. Here, we evaluated toxicity and oncologic outcomes of dose escalation using radiosurgical boost for patients with unfavorable oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma.Materials and methodsBetween 2010-2017, Thirty four patients with intermediate- or high-risk oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled onto this prospective phase I trial. Each patient received concurrent cisplatin and fractionated radiotherapy totaling 60 Gy or 66 Gy followed by radiosurgery boost to areas of residual gross tumor: single fraction of 8 Gy or 10 Gy, or two fractions of 5 Gy each. Primary endpoint was treatment toxicity. Secondary endpoints were local, regional, and distant disease control.ResultsEleven, sixteen and seven patients received radiosurgery boost with 8 Gy in 1 fraction, 10 Gy in 1 fraction, and 10 Gy in 2 fractions respectively. Acute toxicities include 4 patients with tumor necrosis causing grade 3 dysphagia, of which 3 developed grade 4 pharyngeal hemorrhage requiring surgical intervention. At 24 months after treatment, 7%, 9%, and 15% had grade 2 dysgeusia, xerostomia, and dysphagia, respectively, and two patients remained feeding tube dependent. No grade 5 toxicities occurred secondary to treatment. Local, regional, and distant control at a median follow up of 4.2 years were 85.3%, 85.3% and 88.2%, respectively. Five patients died resulting in overall survival of 85.3%.ConclusionsThis study is the first to report the use of radiosurgery boost dose escalation in patients with unfavorable oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma. Longer follow-up, larger cohorts, and further refinement of boost methodology are needed prior to implementation in routine clinical practice.Trial registrationNorthwell Health Protocol #09-309A (NCT02703493) ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02703493 ).
| S-EPMC7731764 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Postoperative radiotherapy improves local control (LC) after resection of brain metastases. In comparison to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to resection cavity significantly reduces cognitive side effects. However, two phase-III trials have reported suboptimal LC with SRS, leading to increased interest in hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as an alternative to improve outcomes. This single-centre study, based on a prospective quality assurance protocol, included 161 patients with 185 resected brain metastases treated with either SRS or SRT between February 2018 and June 2023. Patients were assigned to treatment based on cavity size, with SRS typically used for cavities < 10 cc and SRT for larger volumes. Primary and secondary endpoints were LC and radiation necrosis (RN), respectively. Data analysis was conducted retrospectively. Median cavity size was 13.3 cc, with 20% of cavities receiving SRS and 80% SRT. 12-month LC was 92.6% (95-CI: 88.2 - 97.3%), 12-month RN incidence was 9% (95-CI: 3-14%), with RN limited to CTCAE v5 ≤ 2. In cavities < 10 cc, no significant difference in LC was found between SRS and SRT. For cavities > 10 cc, PTV volume was the only significant predictor of LC, while fractionation and dose did not significantly impact outcomes. SRS and SRT both offer excellent LC for resection cavities < 10 cc with low rates of RN, suggesting SRS as the preferred treatment in this collective, in consideration of patient comfort and resource allocation. In larger cavities, PTV volume significantly influences LC. Dose escalation might be beneficial in improving outcomes in these cases.
| S-EPMC11811445 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established non-invasive ablative therapy for brain metastases. Early clinical trials with SRS proved that tumor control rates are superior to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone. As a result, WBRT plus SRS was widely adopted for patients with a limited number of brain metastases ("limited number" customarily means 1-4). Subsequent trials focused on answering whether WBRT upfront was necessary at all. Based on current randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses comparing SRS alone to SRS plus WBRT, adjuvant WBRT results in better intracranial control; however, at the expense of neurocognitive functioning and quality of life. These adverse effects of WBRT may also negatively impact on survival in younger patients. Based on the results of these studies, treatment has shifted to SRS alone in patients with a limited number of metastases. Additionally, RCTs are evaluating the role of SRS alone in patients with >4 brain metastases. New developments in SRS include fractionated SRS for large tumors and the integration of SRS with targeted systemic therapies that cross the blood brain barrier and/or stimulate an immune response. We present in this review the current high level evidence and rationale supporting SRS as the standard of care for patients with limited brain metastases, and emerging applications of SRS.
| S-EPMC4914287 | biostudies-other
Project description:IntroductionPatients with brain metastases (BrMs) arising from EGFR and ALK driven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have favorable prognoses and evolving treatment options. We evaluated multicenter outcomes for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to multiple (≥4) BrMs, where randomized data remain limited.MethodsData were collected retrospectively from 5 academic centers on EGFR and ALK NSCLC who received SRS to ≥4 BrMs with their first SRS treatment between 2008 and 2018. Analyzed endpoints included overall survival (OS), freedom from CNS progression (FFCNSP), and freedom from whole-brain radiotherapy (FFWBRT).ResultsEighty-nine patients (50 EGFR, 39 ALK) received a total of 159 SRS treatments to 1,080 BrMs, with a median follow up of 51.3 months. The median number of BrMs treated with SRS treatment-1 was 6 (range 4-26) and median for all treatments was 9 (range 4-47). Sixteen patients (18 %) had received WBRT prior to SRS treatment-1. The median OS was 24.2, 21.2, and 33.2 months for all patients, EGFR, and ALK subsets, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, only receipt of a next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor was associated with OS (HR 0.40, p = 0.005). No differences in OS were observed based on number of BrMs treated. The median FFCNSP was 9.4, 11.6, and 7.5 months, for all patients, EGFR, and ALK subsets, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, the number of BrMs (continuous) treated during treatment-1 was the only negative prognostic factor associated with FFCNSP (HR 1.071, p = 0.045). The 5-year FFWBRT was 73.6 %.ConclusionsThis multicenter analysis over a >10-year period demonstrated favorable OS, FFCNSP, and FFWBRT, in patients with EGFR and ALK driven NSCLC receiving SRS to ≥4 BrMs. These data support SRS as an option in the upfront and salvage setting for higher burden CNS disease in this population.
| S-EPMC10552603 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Early imaging-based treatment response assessment of brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains challenging. The aim of this study is to determine whether early (within 12 weeks) intratumoral changes in interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and velocity (IFV) estimated from computational fluid modeling (CFM) using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI can predict long-term outcomes of lung cancer brain metastases (LCBMs) treated with SRS. Methods: Pre- and post-treatment T1-weighted DCE-MRI data were obtained in 41 patients treated with SRS for intact LCBMs. The imaging response was assessed using RANO-BM criteria. For each lesion, extravasation of contrast agent measured from Extended Tofts pharmacokinetic Model (volume transfer constant, Ktrans) was incorporated into a computational fluid model to estimate tumor IFP and IFV. Estimates of mean IFP and IFV and heterogeneity (skewness and kurtosis) were calculated for each lesion from pre- and post-SRS imaging. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was utilized to assess for significant differences in IFP, IFV, and IFP/IFV change (Δ) between response groups. Results: Fifty-three lesions from 41 patients were included. Median follow-up time after SRS was 11 months. The objective response (OR) rate (partial or complete response) was 79%, with 21% demonstrating stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD). There were significant response group differences for multiple posttreatment and Δ CFM parameters: post-SRS IFP skewness (mean -0.405 vs. -0.691, p = 0.022), IFP kurtosis (mean 2.88 vs. 3.51, p = 0.024), and IFV mean (5.75e-09 vs. 4.19e-09 m/s, p = 0.027); and Δ IFP kurtosis (mean -2.26 vs. -0.0156, p = 0.017) and IFV mean (1.91e-09 vs. 2.38e-10 m/s, p = 0.013). Posttreatment and Δ thresholds predicted non-OR with high sensitivity (sens): post-SRS IFP skewness (-0.432, sens 84%), kurtosis (2.89, sens 84%), and IFV mean (4.93e-09 m/s, sens 79%); and Δ IFP kurtosis (-0.469, sens 74%) and IFV mean (9.90e-10 m/s, sens 74%). Conclusions: Objective response was associated with lower post-treatment tumor heterogeneity, as represented by reductions in IFP skewness and kurtosis. These results suggest that early post-treatment assessment of IFP and IFV can be used to predict long-term response of lung cancer brain metastases to SRS, allowing a timelier treatment modification.
| S-EPMC7271672 | biostudies-literature
Project description:First-line stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is now considered the preferred treatment over whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for limited brain metastases arising from most tumor histologies. This standard was reached following the consistent results of multiple phase III studies which demonstrated that, despite improved CNS control, the addition of WBRT to SRS does not improve overall survival (OS) and is associated with a reduction in cognitive function. Thus, it may be reasonable to consider the benchmark necessary to favor a paradigm of SRS alone over strategies incorporating WBRT as the demonstration of comparable OS in the context of decreased treatment-related side effects. However, patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) brain metastases were excluded from the landmark trials that established SRS alone for limited brain metastases, largely due to concerns for short-interval CNS progression in SCLC as well the historic role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in SCLC in the absence of known brain metastases. As a result, WBRT has remained the standard for SCLC for limited and even solitary brain lesions. With shifting SCLC care patterns including increased MRI surveillance, decreased PCI delivery, and emerging systemic agents, interest in first-line SRS for SCLC is likely to continue to increase over time. Herein we will review the emerging data for first-line SRS in the management of SCLC brain metastases and the potential for its increasing role in the setting of a greater utilization of MRI surveillance and improving systemic therapies.
| S-EPMC7656430 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Brain metastases (BM) frequently occur in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Most patients with BM have a limited life expectancy, measured in months. Selected patients may experience a very long progression-free survival, for example, patients with a targetable driver mutation. Traditionally, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the cornerstone of the treatment, but its indication is a matter of debate. A randomized trial has shown that for patients with a poor prognosis, WBRT does not add quality of life (QoL) nor survival over the best supportive care. In recent decades, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an attractive non-invasive treatment for patients with BM. Only the BM is irradiated to an ablative dose, sparing healthy brain tissue. Intracranial recurrence rates decrease when WBRT is administered following SRS or resection but does not improve overall survival and comes at the expense of neurocognitive function and QoL. The downside of SRS compared with WBRT is a risk of radionecrosis (RN) and a higher risk of developing new BM during follow-up. Currently, SRS is an established treatment for patients with a maximum of four BM. Several promising strategies are currently being investigated to further improve the indication and outcome of SRS for patients with BM: the effectivity and safety of SRS in patients with more than four BM, combining SRS with systemic therapy such as targeted agents or immunotherapy, shared decision-making with SRS as a treatment option, and individualized isotoxic dose prescription to mitigate the risk of RN and further enhance local control probability of SRS. This review discusses the current indications of SRS and future directions of treatment for patients with BM of NSCLC with focus on the value of SRS.
| S-EPMC5954030 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION:About 50% of patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are diagnosed with brain metastases during treatment, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important treatment for brain oligometastasis. Some patients with brain metastases have cerebral edema before treatment, and radiation therapy may also cause, or aggravate brain edema. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis and increase vascular permeability, and previous studies have shown that anti-VEGF treatment can reduce brain edema. We hypothesized that anlotinib hydrochloride can reduce perilesional edema around brain metastases, create conditions for subsequent SRS, increase local control rate and improve patient prognosis. METHODS:From one week before stereotactic radiosurgery, patients begin to receive anlotinib once a day (12?mg) from day 1-14 of a 21 day?cycle, with two cycles in total. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan is taken before treatment, one?week and one?month after medication. A total of 50 patients will be included in this study. The primary endpoint is the Edema Index, and the secondary endpoints are intracranial objective response rate (iORR), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and the rate of SRS after anlotinib treatment. DISCUSSION:This study is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical study, and explores the efficacy and tolerability of SRS with anlotinib in NSCLC patients with limited brain metastases. The aim of the study is to provide new treatment options for NSCLC patients with brain metastases.
| S-EPMC7180568 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe optimal treatment for patients with brain metastases remains controversial as the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone, replacing whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), has increased. This study determined the patterns of care at multiple institutions before 2010 and examined whether or not survival was different between patients treated with SRS and patients treated with WBRT.MethodsThis study examined the overall survival of patients treated with radiation therapy for brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; initially diagnosed in 2007-2009) or breast cancer (initially diagnosed in 1997-2009) at 5 centers. Propensity score analyses were performed to adjust for confounding factors such as the number of metastases, the extent of extracranial metastases, and the treatment center.ResultsOverall, 27.8% of 400 NSCLC patients and 13.4% of 387 breast cancer patients underwent SRS alone for the treatment of brain metastases. Few patients with more than 3 brain metastases or lesions ≥ 4 cm in size underwent SRS. Patients with fewer than 4 brain metastases less than 4 cm in size (n = 189 for NSCLC and n = 117 for breast cancer) who were treated with SRS had longer survival (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for NSCLC, 0.58; 95% confidence Interval [CI], 0.38-0.87; P = .01; adjusted HR for breast cancer, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33-0.91; P = .02) than those treated with WBRT.ConclusionsPatients treated for fewer than 4 brain metastases from NSCLC or breast cancer with SRS alone had longer survival than those treated with WBRT in this multi-institutional, retrospective study, even after adjustments for the propensity to undergo SRS. Cancer 2016;122:2091-100. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
| S-EPMC4911286 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an increasingly common modality used with or without surgery for brain metastases (BM). However, biological effect of SRS to tumors in vivois not known. METHODS: Patients were treated with SRS prior to surgery as per the clinical trial protocol. The resected tumor was divided into two groups: ‘center’ and ‘periphery’ with respect to the center of SRS treatment with periphery within 50%-isodose-line. Tissue was analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and compared between the two groups as well as to non-radiated control tissues. RESULTS: All sequenced samples contained greater than 95% clean reads with an average read density of 100 base pairs and mapping efficiency of >99%. Preliminary analysis focused on SNP and Indel detection. In pooled groups with n=7 replicates there was no statistically significant differences in total mutation burden in either SNP’s or Indels compared between controls and both treatment locations. Delving deeper intronic, frameshift, missense, and nonsense mutations all also showed insignificant changes between controls and center or peripheral tumor locations (p >0.5, p >0.1, p >0.4, p >0.3 respectively) hinting that at a pooled biological level there are not significant mutational burdens between treatment locations. However, at the individual level, matched comparison of SRS samples originating from the center or periphery of the same tumor showed total mutational burden differences. 6 out of 7 (86%) patients showed decreased total number of indels in peripheral vs. center and 5 out of 7 (71%) patients showed decreased number of SNP’s in peripheral vs. center locations. CONCLUSION: Ultimately, these data demonstrate the power of matched patient controls over bulk analysis in order to elucidate smaller but possibly biologically meaningful effects, and point to a possible location dependency in treatment associated mutation burden within a single patient and single tumor that may be masked at a population level.
| S-EPMC7213312 | biostudies-literature