Dataset Information

Andexanet versus prothrombin complex concentrates: Differences in reversal of factor Xa inhibitors in in vitro thrombin generation.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is a modified human factor Xa (FXa) approved for anticoagulation reversal in patients with life-threatening bleeding treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) are approved for reversal of vitamin K antagonist-induced anticoagulation but not FXa inhibitors. The mechanism and effectiveness of 4F-PCCs for FXa inhibitor reversal are unclear.

Objective

To investigate the mechanism and impact of 4F-PCCs on reversal of rivaroxaban and apixaban in vitro compared to andexanet.

Methods

The effect of 4F-PCCs (or individual factors) on tissue factor-initiated thrombin generation (TF-TG) was evaluated in human plasma, with or without rivaroxaban or apixaban, and compared with andexanet under the same conditions.

Results

In the TF-TG assay, 4F-PCC completely reversed warfarin anticoagulation. Andexanet normalized TF-TG over a wide range of apixaban and rivaroxaban concentrations tested (19-2000 ng/mL). However, 4F-PCC (or individual factors) was unable to normalize endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) or peak thrombin (Peak) in the presence of apixaban or rivaroxaban (75-500 ng/mL). TF-TG was only normalized by 4F-PCC at inhibitor concentrations <75 ng/mL (ETP) or <37.5 ng/mL (Peak). These data can be explained by the estimated thresholds of FXa activity required to support normal TF-TG based on the inhibitor:FXa ratios and levels of uninhibited FXa. The data are consistent with healthy volunteer studies where TF-TG is not normalized until inhibitor levels are substantially decreased.

Conclusions

Both the theoretical calculations and experimental data demonstrated that 4F-PCCs are only able to normalize TG over a low and narrow range of FXa inhibitor concentrations (<75 ng/mL).

SUBMITTER: Lu G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7695565 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Andexanet versus prothrombin complex concentrates: Differences in reversal of factor Xa inhibitors in in vitro thrombin generation.

Lu Genmin G Lin Joyce J Bui Khanh K Curnutte John T JT Conley Pamela B PB

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis 20200827 8

<h4>Background</h4>Andexanet alfa (andexanet) is a modified human factor Xa (FXa) approved for anticoagulation reversal in patients with life-threatening bleeding treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban. Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrates (4F-PCCs) are approved for reversal of vitamin K antagonist-induced anticoagulation but not FXa inhibitors. The mechanism and effectiveness of 4F-PCCs for FXa inhibitor reversal are unclear.<h4>Objective</h4>To investigate the mechanism and impact of 4F- ...[more]

PMID: 33313467

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background/objectiveThere are limited data on the risks and benefits of using andexanet alfa (AA) in comparison with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) to reverse factor Xa inhibitors (FXi) associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We sought to describe our experience with AA or 4F-PCC in patients with oral FXi-related traumatic and spontaneous ICH.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of consecutive adult patients with FXi-related ICH who received AA or 4F-PCC. FXi-related ICH cases included traumatic and spontaneous intracranial hemorrhages. Our primary analysis evaluated ICH stability on head computed tomography scan (CT), defined as a similar amount of blood from the initial scan at the onset of ICH to subsequent scans, at 6-h and 24-h post-administration of AA or 4F-PCC. For the subset of spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhages, volume was measured at 6-h and 24-h post-reversal. In secondary analyses, we evaluated good functional outcome at discharge, defined as a Modified Rankin Score of less than 3, and the incidence of thrombotic events after AA or 4F-PCC adminstration, during hospitalization.ResultsA total of 44 patients (16 traumatic and 28 spontaneous ICH) with median age of 79 years [72-86], 36% females, with a FXi-related ICH, were included in this study. The majority of spontaneous ICHs were intraparenchymal 19 (68%). Twenty-eight patients (64%) received AA and 16 patients (36%) received 4F-PCC. There was no difference between AA and 4F-PCC in terms of CT stability at 6 h (21 [78%] vs 10 [71%], p = 0.71) and 24 h (15 [88%] vs 6 [60%], p = 0.15). In a subgroup of patients with spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage, there was no difference in the degree of achieved hemostasis based on hematoma volume between AA and 4F-PCC at 6 h (9.3 mL [6.9-26.4] vs 10 mL [9.4-22.1], adjusted p = 0. 997) and 24-h (9.2 mL [6.1-18.8] vs 9.9 [9.4-21.1], adjusted p = 1). The number of patients with good outcome based on mRS on discharge were 10 (36%) and 6 (38%) in the AA and 4F-PCC groups, respectively (adjusted p = 0.81). The incidence of thromboembolic events was similar in the AA and 4F-PCC groups (2 [7%] vs 0, p = 0.53).ConclusionIn this limited sample of patients, we found no difference in neuroimaging stability, functional outcome and thrombotic events when comparing AA and 4F-PCC in patients with FXi-related ICH. Since our analysis is likely underpowered, a multi-center collaborative network devoted to this question is warranted.

Project description:Background: Mortality of oral anticoagulation-associated ICH is around 60%, with oral anticoagulation increasing the risk of ICH seven to ten-fold compared to no anticoagulation. Current guidelines recommend DOACs (direct oral anticoagulants) as first-line therapy in the treatment of VTE (Venous Thromboembolism) due to their more favorable safety profile. There are two agents available for DOAC reversal, Coagulation Factor Xa (recombinant), inactivated-zhzo (andexanet alfa, Andexxa®) and 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC). There is little data comparing the two agents in real-life clinical settings.ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study was to determine if there was a difference in hemostatic efficacy of andexanet alfa and 4FPCC in patients with a factor Xa inhibitor-related intracranial hemorrhage.MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center study conducted in adult patients admitted at a quaternary academic medical center from September 2017 to March 2021. Adults with a diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) were included if they received either 4FPCC or andexanet alfa for reversal of apixaban or rivaroxaban. In addition to hemostatic efficacy per imaging, we assessed disposition location, cerebral performance score, blood product consumption, and the development of a new thrombus.ResultsA total of 46 patients were included in this study, 15 received 4FPCC (32%) and 31 received andexanet alfa (68%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients with excellent (4FPCC 9 [60%] vs. andexanet alfa 16 [51.6%], p = 0.61), good (4FPCC 2 [13.3%] vs. andexanet alfa 7 [22.6%]), or poor (4FPCC 1 [6.7%] vs. andexanet alfa 5 [16.1%]) hemostasis after administration of each agent. There were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes.Conclusion and relevanceOur study found no difference in hemostatic efficacy between andexanet alfa and 4FPCC. At this time, clinicians should choose an agent based on individual patient presentation and resource availability. Further research will help clarify the role of each agent in the management of DOAC-related intracranial hemorrhage.

Project description:BackgroundAndexanet alfa (andexanet) is a recombinant modified human factor Xa decoy protein that has been shown to reverse the inhibition of factor Xa in healthy volunteers.MethodsIn this multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-group study, we evaluated 67 patients who had acute major bleeding within 18 hours after the administration of a factor Xa inhibitor. The patients all received a bolus of andexanet followed by a 2-hour infusion of the drug. Patients were evaluated for changes in measures of anti-factor Xa activity and were assessed for clinical hemostatic efficacy during a 12-hour period. All the patients were subsequently followed for 30 days. The efficacy population of 47 patients had a baseline value for anti-factor Xa activity of at least 75 ng per milliliter (or ≥0.5 IU per milliliter for those receiving enoxaparin) and had confirmed bleeding severity at adjudication.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 77 years; most of the patients had substantial cardiovascular disease. Bleeding was predominantly gastrointestinal or intracranial. The mean (±SD) time from emergency department presentation to the administration of the andexanet bolus was 4.8±1.8 hours. After the bolus administration, the median anti-factor Xa activity decreased by 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58 to 94) from baseline among patients receiving rivaroxaban and by 93% (95% CI, 87 to 94) among patients receiving apixaban. These levels remained similar during the 2-hour infusion. Four hours after the end of the infusion, there was a relative decrease from baseline of 39% in the measure of anti-factor Xa activity among patients receiving rivaroxaban and of 30% among those receiving apixaban. Twelve hours after the andexanet infusion, clinical hemostasis was adjudicated as excellent or good in 37 of 47 patients in the efficacy analysis (79%; 95% CI, 64 to 89). Thrombotic events occurred in 12 of 67 patients (18%) during the 30-day follow-up.ConclusionsOn the basis of a descriptive preliminary analysis, an initial bolus and subsequent 2-hour infusion of andexanet substantially reduced anti-factor Xa activity in patients with acute major bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors, with effective hemostasis occurring in 79%. (Funded by Portola Pharmaceuticals; ANNEXA-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02329327 .).

Dataset Information

Andexanet versus prothrombin complex concentrates: Differences in reversal of factor Xa inhibitors in in vitro thrombin generation.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Andexanet versus prothrombin complex concentrates: Differences in reversal of factor Xa inhibitors in in vitro thrombin generation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets