Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
This study evaluated performance of two hepatitis C virus (HCV) rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) performed by intended users in resource-limited settings.Methods
Testing was conducted at three facilities in two countries (Georgia, Cambodia) using matched fingerstick whole blood, plasma and serum samples. Investigational RDTs were compared with a composite reference standard (CRS) comprised of three laboratory tests, and a reference RDT.Results
In matched samples from 489 HCV positive and 967 HCV negative participants, specificity with both investigational RDTs was high using either reference method (≥98.4% in all sample types). Sensitivity was lower in whole blood versus plasma and serum for both RDTs compared with the CRS (86.5-91.4% vs 97.5-98.0% and 97.3-
SUBMITTER: Vetter BN
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7714359 | biostudies-literature | 2020
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature