Dataset Information

Proportion of people identified as transgender and non-binary gender in Brazil.

ABSTRACT: Studies estimate that gender-diverse persons represent 0.1 to 2% of populations investigated, but no such assessment was performed in Latin America. In a representative sample of Brazil's adult population (n = 6000), we investigated participants' sociodemographic characteristics and possible associations between these and current gender identity, categorized as cisgender, transgender or non-binary gender. We also investigated transgender individuals' distress associated with gender-related body characteristics. As main results, we found that transgender individuals represented 0.69% (CI95% = 0.48-0.90) of the sample, whereas non-binary persons were 1.19% (CI95% = 0.92-1.47). These percentages were not different among Brazil's 5 geographic regions. Preliminary analyses showed that transgender individuals were on average younger (32.8 ± 14.2 years, CI95% = 28.5-37.1), compared to cisgender (42.2 ± 15.9, CI95% = 42.5-42.8) and non-binary (42.1 ± 16.5 years, CI95% = 38.3-46.5) groups. Non-binary persons are less likely to be in a relationship compared to cisgender individuals (OR = 0.57, CI95% = 0.35-0.93). In the transgender group, 85% of transgender men and 50% of transgender women reported distress due to gender-related body characteristics. Our main findings draw attention that gender-diverse Brazilian individuals represent around 2% of the country's adult population (almost 3 million people), and are homogeneously located throughout the country, reiterating the urgency of public health policies for these individuals in the five Brazilian sub-regions.

SUBMITTER: Spizzirri G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7838397 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Proportion of people identified as transgender and non-binary gender in Brazil.

Spizzirri Giancarlo G Eufrásio Raí R Lima Maria Cristina Pereira MCP de Carvalho Nunes Hélio Rubens HR Kreukels Baudewijntje P C BPC Steensma Thomas D TD Abdo Carmita Helena Najjar CHN

Scientific reports 20210126 1

Studies estimate that gender-diverse persons represent 0.1 to 2% of populations investigated, but no such assessment was performed in Latin America. In a representative sample of Brazil's adult population (n = 6000), we investigated participants' sociodemographic characteristics and possible associations between these and current gender identity, categorized as cisgender, transgender or non-binary gender. We also investigated transgender individuals' distress associated with gender-related body ...[more]

PMID: 33500432

Similar Datasets

Project description:Research shows an overrepresentation of trans people in vulnerable socioeconomic situations, primarily due to experiences of discrimination. At the same time, rural or suburban living areas often lack specialized trans-related health care, which a majority of trans people rely on to some extent. Taken together, the lack of both socioeconomic resources and access to trans-related health care can exacerbate health-related distress and impairment for trans people. We illustrate this problem using case vignettes of trans people from rural and suburban areas in (Northern) Germany. They are currently participating in an e-health intervention and randomized controlled trial (RCT) called i2TransHealth, whose case vignettes provided the impetus for the scoping review. The scoping review analyzes the impact of place of residence and its intersection with barriers to accessing trans-related health care. PubMed and Web of Science Data bases were searched for relevant studies using a search strategy related to trans people and remote, rural, or suburban residences. 33 studies were selected after full-text screening and supplemented via reference list checks and study team expertise by 12 articles addressing the living conditions of remotely living trans people and describing requirements for trans-related health care. The literature on trans people living remotely reveals intersections of trans mental health with age, race, gender expression, geographic location, community size, socioeconomic status, discrimination experiences, and attitudes towards health care providers. Several structural health care barriers are identified. The role of health care professionals (HCPs) for remotely living trans people is discussed. There is no need assuming that rural life for trans people is inevitably worse for health and well-being than urban life. Nevertheless, some clear barriers and health disparities exist for trans people in remote settings. Empowering trans groups and diversity-sensitive education of remote communities in private and institutional settings are needed for respectful inclusion of trans people. Facilitating access to trans-related health care, such as through video-based e-health programs with HCPs, can improve both the health and socioeconomic situation of trans people.

Project description:ObjectiveGender-affirming hormones (GAH)-the use of sex hormones to induce desired secondary sex characteristics in transgender individuals-is vital healthcare for many transgender people. Among prescribers of GAH, there is debate regarding the value of a universal requirement for an evaluation by a mental health provider prior to GAH initiation. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe the range of attitudes and approaches to mental health evaluation among GAH providers in the United States. We analyzed the providers' attitudes and base our recommendations on this analysis.MethodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 healthcare providers who prescribe GAH across the United States. Participants were purposefully recruited using professional networks and snowball sampling to include those who require mental health evaluation and those who do not. We adapted domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework-a framework for understanding influences on health professional behavior-to inform the interviews and analysis. Guided by these domains, we iteratively coded text and identified theoretical relationships among the categories.ResultsWhile some felt a universal requirement for mental health "clearance" was necessary for the identification of appropriate candidates for GAH, others described this requirement as a form of "gatekeeping" that limits access to care. Themes we identified included providers' ability to ascertain gender identity; concern about mental illness; GAH provider and mental health provider expertise; and provider roles. All providers appreciated the potential advantages of mental health support during GAH treatment.ConclusionProviders in our study practice on a continuum of care rather than adhering to strict rules about the requirement for mental health evaluation prior to GAH treatment. Where they fall on this continuum is influenced primarily by their perceptions of transgender identity and transition, and their interpretation of risk for significant mental illness and its association with transness. Providers who required universal evaluation by a mental health professional tended to hold essentialist, medicalized, and binary ideas of gender and transness.

Project description:BackgroundTransgender and gender-diverse individuals are particularly vulnerable to healthcare discrimination and related health sequelae.ObjectiveTo demonstrate diversity in demographics and explore variance in needs at the time of intake among patients seeking care at a large, urban gender health program.DesignWe present summary statistics of patient demographics, medical histories, and gender-affirming care needs stratified by gender identity and sexual orientation.ParticipantsWe reviewed all intake interviews with individuals seeking care in our gender health program from 2017 to 2020.Main measuresClients reported all the types of care in which they were interested at the time of intake as their "reason for call" (i.e., establish primary care, hormone management, surgical services, fertility services, behavioral health, or other health concerns).Key resultsOf 836 patients analyzed, 350 identified as trans women, 263 as trans men, and 223 as non-binary. The most prevalent sexual identity was straight among trans women (34%) and trans men (38%), whereas most (69%) non-binary individuals identified as pansexual or queer; only 3% of non-binary individuals identified as straight. Over half of patients reported primary care, hormone management, or surgical services as the primary reason for contacting our program. Straight, transgender women were more likely to report surgical services as their primary reason for contacting our program, whereas gay transgender men were more likely to report primary care as their reason.ConclusionsIndividuals contacting our gender health program to establish care were diverse in sexual orientation and gender-affirming care needs. Care needs varied with both gender identity and sexual orientation, but primary care, hormone management, and surgical services were high priorities across groups. Providers of gender-affirming care should inquire about sexual orientation and detailed treatment priorities, as trans and gender-diverse populations are not uniform in their treatment needs or goals.

Project description:Transgender and/or gender non-binary (TGNB) individuals face significant health care disparities, including deficiencies in provider knowledge. To address this knowledge gap for genetic counselors, we developed, implemented, and analyzed an educational intervention on gender-affirming genetic counseling (GC) and care for TGNB patients. In partnership with the TGNB community, we designed a 5-module (length = 146 min ± 94 min) genetic counseling-targeted online learning program focused on gender-affirming care (Amplify). Content included elements of gender-affirming care, core components of gender-inclusive GC sessions, and cancer risk assessment/management. Video testimonials featuring TGNB individuals complemented learning within each module. Educational outcomes measured included comfort working with TGNB patients (n = 2 multiple choice questions (MCQs)), impact of education on knowledge (n = 25 MCQs), and clinical self-efficacy based on the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling competencies (n = 35 skills). Participants (n = 40), recruited through state and national GC organizations, completed all modules, and pre- and post-education/self-efficacy assessments. Pre-Amplify, 65% (n = 26/40) of participants endorsed feeling 'somewhat comfortable' working with TGNB patients. The average knowledge score was 77.6% (SD = 11.2%) with the lowest scores related to the gender affirmation process. After Amplify, overall knowledge improvement was statistically significant with an average 16.9% (p < 0.001) increase in score. Pre-Amplify, the average self-efficacy score was 78.4% (SD = 15.8%) with lowest scores seen in statements surrounding information gathering of family and medical histories. Post-Amplify, overall self-efficacy improvement was statistically significant with an average 13.8% (p < 0.001) increase in score. Linear regression did not identify an impact of practice specialty on participants' knowledge gains or self-efficacy. This study shows online modules are an effective form of gender-affirming care education for GCs. This intervention can positively improve the care practicing genetic counselors provide to patients and inform future decision-making about the development of gender-affirming care education for genetic counselors.

Project description:Transgender and non-binary people are disproportionately burdened by barriers to quality healthcare, mental health challenges, and economic hardship. This study examined the impact of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and subsequent control measures on gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability among transgender and non-binary people globally. We collected global cross-sectional data from 964 transgender and non-binary adult users of the Hornet and Her apps from April to August 2020 to characterize changes in gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted Poisson regression models to assess if access to gender-affirming care and ability to live according to one's gender were related to depressive symptoms, anxiety, and changes in suicidal ideation. Individuals resided in 76 countries, including Turkey (27.4%,n=264/964) and Thailand (20.6%,n=205). A majority were non-binary (66.8%,n=644) or transfeminine (29.4%,n=283). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 55.0% (n=320/582) reported reduced access to gender- affirming resources, and 38.0% (n=327/860) reported reduced time lived according to their gender. About half screened positive for depression (50.4%,442/877) and anxiety (45.8%,n=392/856). One in six (17.0%,n=112/659) expected losses of health insurance, and 77.0% (n=724/940) expected income reductions. The prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and increased suicidal ideation were 1.63 (95% CI: 1.36-1.97), 1.61 (95% CI: 1.31-1.97), and 1.74 (95% CI: 1.07-2.82) times higher for individuals whose access to gender- affirming resources was reduced versus not. The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced access to gender-affirming resources and the ability of transgender and non-binary people to live according to their gender worldwide. These reductions may drive the increased depressive symptoms, anxiety, and suicidal ideation reported in this sample. To improve transgender and non-binary health globally, increased access to gender-affirming resources should be achieved through policies (e.g., digital prescriptions), flexible interventions (e.g., telehealth), and support for existing transgender health initiatives.

Dataset Information

Proportion of people identified as transgender and non-binary gender in Brazil.

Publications

Proportion of people identified as transgender and non-binary gender in Brazil.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets