Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Proposal of Lentzea deserti (Okoro et al. 2010) Nouioui et al. 2018 as a later heterotypic synonym of Lentzea atacamensis (Okoro et al. 2010) Nouioui et al. 2018 and an emended description of Lentzea atacamensis.

ABSTRACT: The taxonomic relationship of Lentzea atacamensis and Lentzea deserti were re-evaluated using comparative genome analysis. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that the type strains of L. atacamensis and L. deserti shared 99.7% sequence similarity. The digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between the genomes of two type strains were 88.6% and 98.8%, respectively, greater than the two recognized thresholds values of 70% dDDH and 95-96% ANI for bacterial species delineation. These results suggested that L. atacamensis and L. deserti should share the same taxonomic position. And this conclusion was further supported by similar phenotypic and chemotaxonomic features between them. Therefore, we propose that L. deserti is a later heterotypic synonym of L. atacamensis.

SUBMITTER: Ping M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7861442 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Json Xml
altmetric image

Publications

Proposal of Lentzea deserti (Okoro et al. 2010) Nouioui et al. 2018 as a later heterotypic synonym of Lentzea atacamensis (Okoro et al. 2010) Nouioui et al. 2018 and an emended description of Lentzea atacamensis.

Ping Mo M   Yun-Lin Zhao Z   Jun Liu L   Jian Gao G   Zheng-Gang Xu X  

PloS one 20210204 2

The taxonomic relationship of Lentzea atacamensis and Lentzea deserti were re-evaluated using comparative genome analysis. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that the type strains of L. atacamensis and L. deserti shared 99.7% sequence similarity. The digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between the genomes of two type strains were 88.6% and 98.8%, respectively, greater than the two recognized thresholds values of 70% dDDH and 95-96% ANI for  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

Unknown BA GWAS Chen et al PLOS Genet 2018
| S-BSST182 | biostudies-other
Genomics Noya et al., 2018
| PRJEB28239 | ENA
Unknown Reply to Soman et al, Alffenaar et al, Metcalfe et al, and Raoult.
| S-EPMC4696596 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Multilocus sequence analysis for the taxonomic updating and identification of the genus Proteus and reclassification of Proteus genospecies 5 O'Hara et al. 2000, Proteus cibarius Hyun et al. 2016 as later heterotypic synonyms of Proteus terrae Behrendt et al. 2015.
| S-EPMC7288399 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Cryobiopsy Compared with Surgical Lung Biopsy in ILD: Reply to Maldonado <i>et al.</i>, Froidure <i>et al.</i>, Bendstrup <i>et al.</i>, Agarwal <i>et al.</i>, Richeldi <i>et al.</i>, Rajchgot <i>et al.</i>, and Quadrelli <i>et al</i>.
| S-EPMC6812448 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Reply to Turnbull et al. and to Hulme et al.
| S-EPMC7068835 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Reply to Gueret et al. and to Hammond et al.
| S-EPMC7193864 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Reply to Topeli et al. and to Akinosoglou et al.
| S-EPMC7328319 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Parabreviscolexniepini Xi et al., 2018 (Cestoda, Caryophyllidea).
| S-EPMC6182261 | biostudies-literature
Unknown Comparing polysaccharide decomposition between the type strains Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)), and emended description of Gramella echinicola Nedashkovskaya et al. 2005 emend. Shahina et al. 2014 and Gramella portivictoriae Lau et al. 2005.
| S-EPMC4891872 | biostudies-literature