Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Voysey M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7894131 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials.
Voysey Merryn M Costa Clemens Sue Ann SA Madhi Shabir A SA Weckx Lily Y LY Folegatti Pedro M PM Aley Parvinder K PK Angus Brian B Baillie Vicky L VL Barnabas Shaun L SL Bhorat Qasim E QE Bhorat Qasim E QE Bibi Sagida S Briner Carmen C Cicconi Paola P Clutterbuck Elizabeth A EA Collins Andrea M AM Cutland Clare L CL Darton Thomas C TC Dheda Keertan K Dold Christina C Duncan Christopher J A CJA Emary Katherine R W KRW Ewer Katie J KJ Flaxman Amy A Fairlie Lee L Faust Saul N SN Feng Shuo S Ferreira Daniela M DM Finn Adam A Galiza Eva E Goodman Anna L AL Green Catherine M CM Green Christopher A CA Greenland Melanie M Hill Catherine C Hill Helen C HC Hirsch Ian I Izu Alane A Jenkin Daniel D Joe Carina C D CCD Kerridge Simon S Koen Anthonet A Kwatra Gaurav G Lazarus Rajeka R Libri Vincenzo V Lillie Patrick J PJ Marchevsky Natalie G NG Marshall Richard P RP Mendes Ana V A AVA Milan Eveline P EP Minassian Angela M AM McGregor Alastair A Mujadidi Yama F YF Nana Anusha A Padayachee Sherman D SD Phillips Daniel J DJ Pittella Ana A Plested Emma E Pollock Katrina M KM Ramasamy Maheshi N MN Ritchie Adam J AJ Robinson Hannah H Schwarzbold Alexandre V AV Smith Andrew A Song Rinn R Snape Matthew D MD Sprinz Eduardo E Sutherland Rebecca K RK Thomson Emma C EC Török M Estée ME Toshner Mark M Turner David P J DPJ Vekemans Johan J Villafana Tonya L TL White Thomas T Williams Christopher J CJ Douglas Alexander D AD Hill Adrian V S AVS Lambe Teresa T Gilbert Sarah C SC Pollard Andrew J AJ
Lancet (London, England) 20210219 10277
<h4>Background</h4>The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine has been approved for emergency use by the UK regulatory authority, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, with a regimen of two standard doses given with an interval of 4-12 weeks. The planned roll-out in the UK will involve vaccinating people in high-risk categories with their first dose immediately, and delivering the second dose 12 weeks later. Here, we provide both a further prespecified pooled analysis of trials of ChAd ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe spread of SARS-CoV-2 has caused a worldwide pandemic that has affected almost every aspect of human life. The development of an effective COVID-19 vaccine could limit the morbidity and mortality caused by infection and may enable the relaxation of social-distancing measures. Age is one of the most significant risk factors for poor health outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection; therefore, it is desirable that any new vaccine candidates elicit a robust immune response in older adults.MethodsHere, we use in-depth immunophenotyping to characterize the innate and adaptive immune response induced upon intramuscular administration of the adenoviral vectored ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD-1222) COVID-19 vaccine candidate in mice.FindingsA single vaccination generates spike-specific Th1 cells, Th1-like Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, polyfunctional spike-specific CD8+ T cells. and granzyme-B-producing CD8 effectors. Spike-specific IgG and IgM are generated from both the early extrafollicular antibody response and the T follicular helper cell-supported germinal center reaction, which is associated with the production of virus-neutralizing antibodies. A single dose of this vaccine generated a similar type of immune response in aged mice but of a reduced magnitude than in younger mice. We report that a second dose enhances the immune response to this vaccine in aged mice.ConclusionsThis study shows that ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 induces both cellular and humoral immunity in adult and aged mice and suggests a prime-boost strategy is a rational approach to enhance immunogenicity in older persons.FundingThis study was supported by BBSRC, Lister institute of Preventative Medicine, EPSRC VaxHub, and Innovate UK.
| S-EPMC7833318 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe report updated safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) from an ongoing phase 3 trial.MethodsAdults at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection were randomized (2:1), stratified by age, to receive 2 doses of AZD1222 or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase PCR-positive (RT-PCR-positive) symptomatic COVID-19 at 15 or more days after a second dose in baseline SARS-CoV-2-seronegative participants. The 21,634 and 10,816 participants were randomized to AZD1222 and placebo, respectively.FindingsData cutoff for this analysis was July 30, 2021; median follow-up from second dose was 78 and 71 days for the double-blind period (censoring at unblinding or nonstudy COVID-19 vaccination) and 201 and 82 days for the period to nonstudy COVID-19 vaccination (regardless of unblinding) in the AZD1222 and placebo groups, respectively. For the primary efficacy end point in the double-blind period (141 and 184 events; incidence rates: 39.2 and 118.8 per 1,000 person years), vaccine efficacy was 67.0% (P < 0.001). In the period to nonstudy COVID-19 vaccination, incidence of events remained consistently low and stable through 6 months in the AZD1222 group; for the primary efficacy end point (328 and 219 events; incidence rates: 36.4, 108.4) and severe/critical disease (5 and 13 events; incidence rates: 0.6, 6.4), respective vaccine efficacy estimates were 65.1% and 92.1%. AZD1222 elicited humoral immune responses over time, with waning at day 180. No emergent safety issues were seen.ConclusionAZD1222 is safe and well tolerated, demonstrating durable protection and immunogenicity with median follow-up (AZD1222 group) of 6 months.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04516746.FundingAstraZeneca; US government.
| S-EPMC9479753 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8530465 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) is a COVID-19 vaccine that is not yet licensed for use during pregnancy. To support the inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding people in AZD1222 clinical studies, a non-clinical developmental and reproductive toxicity study was performed to evaluate its effects on fertility and reproductive processes of female CD-1 mice during the embryofetal development phase, and postnatal outcomes during the littering phase. Immunogenicity assessments were also made in dams, fetuses, and pups. There were no vaccine-related unscheduled deaths throughout the study. Furthermore, there were no vaccine-related effects on female reproduction, fetal or pup survival, fetal external, visceral, or skeletal findings, pup physical development, and no abnormal gross pathology findings in pups or dams. Antibody responses raised in dams were maintained throughout gestation and postnatal periods, and seroconversion in fetuses and pups indicate placental and lactational transfer of immunoglobulins. Together with clinical data from non-pregnant people, these results support the inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding people in AZD1222 clinical studies.
| S-EPMC9759091 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8670752 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A better understanding of the long-term safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines is needed. This phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study for AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) primary-series vaccination enrolled 32,450 participants in the USA, Chile, and Peru between August 2020 and January 2021 (NCT04516746). Endpoints included the 2-year follow-up assessment of safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity. After 2 years, no emergent safety signals were observed for AZD1222, and no cases of thrombotic thrombocytopenia syndrome were reported. The assessment of anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibody titers confirmed the durability of AZD1222 efficacy for up to 6 months, after which infection rates in the AZD1222 group increased over time. Despite this, all-cause and COVID-19-related mortality remained low through the study end, potentially reflecting the post-Omicron decoupling of SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and severe COVID-19 outcomes. Geometric mean titers were elevated for anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies at the 1-year study visit and the anti-spike antibodies were elevated at year 2, providing further evidence of increasing SARS-CoV-2 infections over long-term follow-up. Overall, this 2-year follow-up of the AZD1222 phase 3 study confirms that the long-term safety profile remains consistent with previous findings and supports the continued need for COVID-19 booster vaccinations due to waning efficacy and humoral immunity.
| S-EPMC11359581 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objectives: To investigate the differences in efficacy and safety between the vector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) and mRNA-based vaccine mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and evaluate the impact of anti-rheumatic medications on immunogenicity in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD). Methods: From September 16 to November 15, 2021, we consecutively enrolled participants aged≥20 years with AIRD who received COVID-19 vaccination. The level of serum IgG antibodies to the SARS-Cov-2 receptor-binding domain on the spike protein S1 subunit was quantified by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay at 4-6 weeks after vaccination. The immunogenicity and adverse reactions between ChAdOx1 nCov-19/AZD1222 and mRNA-1273 were compared. Results: Of the 243 rheumatic disease patients who received COVID-19 vaccines, 113 and 130 were immunized with AZD1222 and mRNA-1273, respectively. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity rate was 78.8% (89/113) for AZD1222 and 83.1% (108/130) for mRNA-1273. The level of anti-SARS-Cov-2 IgG was higher in patients who received mRNA-1273 than in those who received AZD1222. Prednisolone-equivalent dose >5 mg/day, methotrexate (MTX), non-anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a biologics, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor use were associated with inferior immunogenicity. All reported adverse reactions were minor. More localized pain at the injection site and less fever and chills were observed in patients receiving mRNA-1273 compared with those receiving AZD1222. Rheumatic disease activities after vaccination remained stable in most patients. Conclusions: mRNA-1273 and AZD1222 vaccines exhibited differential immunogenicity and adverse reaction profiles. Our study findings support temporary discontinuation of daily prednisolone dose >5 mg, MTX, non-anti-TNF-a biologics, or JAK inhibitors after COVID-19 vaccination.
2022-05-19 | GSE203081 | GEO
Project description:Rare cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) have been reported after AZD1222. Anti-platelet factor-4 (PF4) antibodies were observed in patients following presentation of TTS, however it is unclear if AZD1222 was responsible for inducing production of anti-PF4. Paired samples (baseline and day-15) from a phase 3 trial of AZD1222 vs placebo were analyzed for anti-PF4 levels; 19/1727 (1.1%, AZD1222) vs 7/857 (0.8%, placebo) participants were anti-PF4-IgG-negative at baseline but had moderate Day-15 levels (P = 0.676) and 0/35 and 1/20 (5.0%) had moderate levels at baseline but high Day-15 levels. These data indicate that AZD1222 does not induce a clinically relevant general increase in anti-PF4 IgG.
| S-EPMC9103599 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There is a limited supply of COVID-19 vaccines, with less than 20% of eligible populations in low-income countries having received one dose. Intradermal delivery of fractional dose vaccines is one way to improve global vaccine access, but no studies have reported data on intradermal delivery of COVID-19 primary series vaccination. We conducted a pilot study to examine the safety and immunogenicity of three intradermal primary series regimens - heterologous regimen of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 (CoronaVac-ChAdOx1), homologous regimen of ChAdOx1 (ChAdOx1-ChAdOx1), and homologous regimen of BNT162b2 (BNT162b2-BNT162b2). Each dose was 1/5th or 1/6th of the standard dose. Two additional exploratory arms of intradermal vaccination for the second dose following an intramuscular first dose of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 were included. Intradermal vaccination was found to be immunogenic and safe. The antibody responses generated by the intradermal primary series were highest in the BNT162b2 arms. The anti-receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) IgG concentration following fractional dose intradermal vaccination was similar to that of standard dose intramuscular vaccination of the same regimen for all study arms except for BNT162b2. The BNT162b2 intradermal series generated a lower antibody concentration than the reference intramuscular series, despite generating the highest antibody concentration of all three intradermal primary series regimens. Neutralizing antibody responses against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain were consistent with what was observed for anti-RBD IgG, with lower titers for SARS-CoV-2 variants. Neutralizing titers were lowest against the omicron variant, being undetectable in about a quarter of study participants. T-cell responses against spike- and nucleocapsid-membrane-open reading frame proteins were also detected following intradermal vaccination. Adverse effects following intradermal vaccination were generally comparable with post-intramuscular vaccination effects. Taken together, our data suggest that intradermal vaccination using 1/5th or 1/6th of standard COVID-19 intramuscular vaccination dosing were immunogenic with tendency of lower systemic adverse reactions than intramuscular vaccination. Our findings have implications in settings where COVID-19 vaccines are in shortage.
| S-EPMC9577032 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of the AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine in a large, diverse population at increased risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the United States, Chile, and Peru has not been known.MethodsIn this ongoing, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial, we investigated the safety, vaccine efficacy, and immunogenicity of two doses of AZD1222 as compared with placebo in preventing the onset of symptomatic and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) 15 days or more after the second dose in adults, including older adults, in the United States, Chile, and Peru.ResultsA total of 32,451 participants underwent randomization, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive AZD1222 (21,635 participants) or placebo (10,816 participants). AZD1222 was safe, with low incidences of serious and medically attended adverse events and adverse events of special interest; the incidences were similar to those observed in the placebo group. Solicited local and systemic reactions were generally mild or moderate in both groups. Overall estimated vaccine efficacy was 74.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.3 to 80.5; P<0.001) and estimated vaccine efficacy was 83.5% (95% CI, 54.2 to 94.1) in participants 65 years of age or older. High vaccine efficacy was consistent across a range of demographic subgroups. In the fully vaccinated analysis subgroup, no severe or critical symptomatic Covid-19 cases were observed among the 17,662 participants in the AZD1222 group; 8 cases were noted among the 8550 participants in the placebo group (<0.1%). The estimated vaccine efficacy for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection (nucleocapsid antibody seroconversion) was 64.3% (95% CI, 56.1 to 71.0; P<0.001). SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding and neutralizing antibodies increased after the first dose and increased further when measured 28 days after the second dose.ConclusionsAZD1222 was safe and efficacious in preventing symptomatic and severe Covid-19 across diverse populations that included older adults. (Funded by AstraZeneca and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04516746.).
| S-EPMC8522798 | biostudies-literature