Outcomes of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia after frontline hypomethylating agent and venetoclax regimens.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Maiti A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7927994 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Outcomes of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia after frontline hypomethylating agent and venetoclax regimens.
Maiti Abhishek A Rausch Caitlin R CR Cortes Jorge E JE Pemmaraju Naveen N Daver Naval G NG Ravandi Farhad F Garcia-Manero Guillermo G Borthakur Gautam G Naqvi Kiran K Ohanian Maro M Short Nicholas J NJ Alvarado Yesid Y Kadia Tapan M TM Takahashi Koichi K Yilmaz Musa M Jain Nitin N Kornblau Steven S Montalban Bravo Guillermo G Sasaki Koji K Andreeff Michael M Bose Prithiviraj P Ferrajoli Alessandra A Issa Ghayas C GC Jabbour Elias J EJ Masarova Lucia L Thompson Philip A PA Wang Sa S Konoplev Sergej S Pierce Sherry A SA Ning Jing J Qiao Wei W Welch John S JS Kantarjian Hagop M HM DiNardo Courtney D CD Konopleva Marina Y MY
Haematologica 20210301 3
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6119155 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8855495 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis and represents a major unmet medical need. We report on a real-world academic center experience of treating 25 patients with relapsed/refractory AML using venetoclax in combination with decitabine or azacitidine, which is not otherwise widely evaluated in the current literature. Our patients come from a large, socioeconomically and geographically diverse area including the majority of Northern California. Most had ELN Adverse Risk (52%) or Intermediate Risk (44%) AML, and most had an ECOG Performance Status of 1 (64%). Over half (52%) had prior hypomethylating agent exposure, and 40% had Secondary AML. We observed an overall response rate of 52%, with eight patients (32%) achieving composite complete remission. Median overall survival was 5.5 months, and for patients achieving composite complete remission this was 21.6 months. One-year estimated overall survival was 38%. Three patients were able to proceed directly to stem cell transplant for consolidation, and all three were alive at last follow-up, ranging 13.8-24.0 months. We found venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents to be well tolerated and potentially efficacious in securing long-term remissions for patients with relapsed/refractory AML.
| S-EPMC7991747 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Off-label hypomethylating agents and venetoclax (HMA/VEN) are often used for relapsed and refractory (R/R) AML patients. However, predictors of outcome are elusive. The objective of the current retrospective observational multicenter study of 240 adult patients (median age 68.6 years) with R/R AML was to establish a prognostic risk score. Overall response was documented in 106 (44%) patients. With a median follow-up of 31.5 months, 179 deaths were recorded. Median overall survival (mOS) was 7.9 months. In multivariate analysis of the subgroup with molecular information (n = 174), risk factors for inferior survival included the presence of extramedullary disease, HMA pretreatment and mutations in NF1, PTPN11, FLT3, and TP53, whereas mutated SF3B1 was identified as favorable risk factor. These risk factors were subsequently applied to construct an HR-weighted risk model that allocated patients to one of three risk groups with significantly different survival outcomes: favorable (n = 46; mOS 21.4 months), intermediate (n = 75; mOS 7.5 months), and adverse (n = 53; mOS 4.6 months; p < 0.001). The model was validated in 189 AML patients treated with HMA/VEN in first line. This clinical-molecular, 3-tiered venetoclax prognostic risk score (VEN-PRS) for HMA/VEN treatment outcomes in R/R AML patients will support the selection of appropriate treatment options in this high-risk population.
| S-EPMC11879869 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Despite the progress in the development of new therapeutic strategies, relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still represents a high unmet medical need. Treatment options in this setting include enrollment into clinical trials, allogeneic stem cell transplantation and/or targeted therapy. Nevertheless, it is associated with poor outcomes. Thus, the development of new treatments, which could ameliorate the prognosis of these patients with a good safety profile are highly demanded. Recently, venetoclax (VEN) has been approved for naïve AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. In this regard, regimens including VEN could represent a valuable treatment option even in those with R/R disease and several studies have been conducted to demonstrate its role in this clinical setting. This review aims to summarize the current evidence on the use of VEN regimens in the treatment of R/R AML.
| S-EPMC8750253 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Recently, the combination of VEN-HMA has been shown to achieve durable responses in patients with both newly diagnosed (ND) and R/R-AML. We retrospectively evaluated the post-allo-HCT outcomes of 50 patients who received VEN-HMA therapy. In total, 10 were ND and 40 were R/R and, at the time of HCT, the median age was 53 years. In the ND- and R/R-AML groups, the percentage of patients who achieved CR/CRi or MLFS was 90% and 92.5%, respectively. In all, after a median follow-up of 13.7 months, the probabilities of overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year were 63.7%, 59.3%, 28.5%, and 12.2%, respectively. In addition, the cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD at 1 year were 28.4% and 37.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with a statistically significant impact on OS were VEN-HMA cycle (p = 0.021), ELN risk group (p = 0.041), and the response to VEN-HMA therapy before allo-HCT (p = 0.003). Although 80% of our patients had R/R-AML and 30% underwent a second allo-HCT, our data still suggest that allo-HCT following VEN-HMA therapy is a safe and effective treatment option.
| S-EPMC10046472 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe prognosis of patients with refractory or relapsed AML (R/R-AML) is very limited. To (re)achieve complete remission, there has recently been increasing evidence that the combination of venetoclax (VEN) with chemotherapy is associated with improved outcomes.Patients and methodsOur retrospective, single-center study of 53 R/R-AML patients with a median follow-up time of 11.0 months compared standard salvage chemotherapy (FLAG-Ida or HAM in n = 35 patients) with a combination of venetoclax (VEN) and FLAG-Ida (FLAVIDA in n = 18 patients) concerning safety and efficacy.ResultsRegarding the primary endpoints, there was a statistically significant increased event free survival (EFS) in the FLAVIDA group compared to patients with standard chemotherapy based on the univariate log-rank-test and in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR 0.22 [95% CI 0.05, 0.97]). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of patients developing febrile neutropenia CTCAE III° and IV° or a delay in hematological recovery. In addition, a clear trend towards an improved overall response rate (78% vs. 51%) was demonstrated in the FLAVIDA group.ConclusionsThe FLAVIDA regimen represents a promising treatment alternative for R/R AML patients with a high response rate and significantly improved EFS compared to standard chemotherapy.
| S-EPMC11613577 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor gilteritinib is standard therapy for relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but seldom reduces FLT3mut burden or induces sustained efficacy. Gilteritinib combines synergistically with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax in preclinical models of FLT3mut AML.MethodsThis phase Ib open-label, dose-escalation/dose-expansion study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03625505) enrolled patients with FLT3 wild-type and FLT3mut (escalation) or FLT3mut (expansion) relapsed/refractory AML. Patients received 400 mg oral venetoclax once daily and 80 mg or 120 mg oral gilteritinib once daily. The primary objectives were safety, identification of the recommended phase II dose, and the modified composite complete response (mCRc) rate (complete response [CR] + CR with incomplete blood count recovery + CR with incomplete platelet recovery + morphologic leukemia-free state) using ADMIRAL phase III-defined response criteria.ResultsSixty-one patients were enrolled (n = 56 FLT3mut); 64% (n = 36 of 56) of FLT3mut patients had received prior FLT3 inhibitor therapy. The recommended phase II dose was 400 mg venetoclax once daily and 120 mg gilteritinib once daily. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were cytopenias (n = 49; 80%). Adverse events prompted venetoclax and gilteritinib dose interruptions in 51% and 48%, respectively. The mCRc rate for FLT3mut patients was 75% (CR, 18%; CR with incomplete blood count recovery, 4%; CR with incomplete platelet recovery, 18%; and morphologic leukemia-free state, 36%) and was similar among patients with or without prior FLT3 inhibitor therapy (80% v 67%, respectively). The median follow-up was 17.5 months. The median time to response was 0.9 months, and the median remission duration was 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 6.6). FLT3 molecular response (< 10-2) was achieved in 60% of evaluable mCRc patients (n = 15 of 25). The median overall survival for FLT3mut patients was 10.0 months.ConclusionThe combination of venetoclax and gilteritinib was associated with high mCRc and FLT3 molecular response rates regardless of prior FLT3 inhibitor exposure. Dose interruptions were needed to mitigate myelosuppression.
| S-EPMC9746764 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) has demonstrated exceptional activity in elderly and unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Notably, the safety profile of venetoclax-based induction regimens was favorable, with a low rate of early treatment-related mortality, even in frail study participants. Thus, the introduction of venetoclax has transformed the landscape of AML therapy in elderly patients. Given these promising results, venetoclax in combination with other agents is now being studied as a frontline therapy in younger patients with AML, as well as in relapsed/refractory AML patients. Here, we review clinical data for venetoclax-based therapy in AML, both from prospective as well as retrospective studies, and highlight ongoing novel studies of venetoclax-containing regimens and discuss future research directions.
| S-EPMC7882757 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy and the clinical and molecular predictors of response and survival following venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (VEN + HMAs) in adult relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 197 adult R/R AML patients who received the VEN + HMAs regimen. Molecular profiling was performed using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 139 genes to explore potential response and survival genetic predictors.ResultsThe median treatment cycle was 1 (1-4) cycle. The composite complete remission (CRc) rate, encompassing complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), was 44.7%, while the overall response rate (ORR) reached 59.9%. With a median follow-up period of 14.0 months (range: 0.7-54.0 months), the 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 55.4% and 40.2%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that mutations in NPM1 and SRSF2 were significantly associated with improved response rates. Conversely, prior exposure to HMA therapy, early relapse, and the presence of GATA2 mutations were linked to lower response rates. Regarding survival outcomes, the CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene, as well as mutations in NPM1 and IDH1/2, were found to be favorable prognostic factors for OS, whereas mutations in FLT3-ITD, TP53, DNMT3A, and GATA2 were associated with worse OS.ConclusionsThe VEN + HMAs regimen demonstrated considerable efficacy in the treatment of R/R AML patients, with both response rates and overall survival being influenced by distinct genetic features. These findings provide valuable insights into optimizing personalized treatment strategies for this challenging patient population.
| S-EPMC11852425 | biostudies-literature