Dataset Information

The significance of systematic lymph node dissection in surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients aged ≤40 years.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Surgery remains the best option for treating early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and lymph node dissection (LND) is an important step in this approach. However, the extent of LND in the general age population, especially in young patients, is controversial. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the correlation between systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) and prognosis in young (≤40 years) patients with stage IA NSCLC.

Methods

Clinicopathological data of 191 patients aged ≤40 years who underwent surgical pulmonary resection for stage IA NSCLC between January 2010 and December 2016 were retrospectively collected. Of the patients, 104 received SLND (SLND group), while the other 87 patients underwent sampling or no LND (non-SLND group). The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) curves of the patients from each group were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the correlations of the patients' clinical factors with prognosis were also analyzed.

Results

The median follow-up period was 55 months. During follow-up, 7 patients died, and recurrence or metastasis was detected in 16 patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in DFS (P=0.132) between the SLND and non-SLND group, but a significant difference was found between the groups in OS (P=0.022). Additionally, there was no statistically pronounced difference in OS or DFS between male and female patients. Multivariate survival analysis showed that the type of SLND, as well as tumor size, is an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR, 3.530; 95% CI, 1.120-11.119; P=0.031) and OS (HR, 13.076; 95% CI, 1.209-141.443; P=0.034).

Conclusions

For young (age ≤40) stage IA NSCLC patients with pathological invasive adenocarcinoma, intraoperative SLND can improve the DFS and OS. Further studies are needed to verify the most optimal degree of LND in young patients.

SUBMITTER: Guo ZY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7947521 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The significance of systematic lymph node dissection in surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients aged ≤40 years.

Guo Zhi-Yi ZY Ren Jiang-Hao JH Xu Yuan-Yuan YY Liu Rui-Jun RJ Tao Hui H Huang Jia J Tan Qiang Q

Journal of thoracic disease 20210201 2

<h4>Background</h4>Surgery remains the best option for treating early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and lymph node dissection (LND) is an important step in this approach. However, the extent of LND in the general age population, especially in young patients, is controversial. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the correlation between systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) and prognosis in young (≤40 years) patients with stage IA NSCLC.<h4>Methods</h4>Clinicopathological d ...[more]

PMID: 33717592

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectiveTheoretically, systematic lymph node dissection (SLND) in lung cancer surgery is a technique that leaves less cancer cells behind and is speculated to improve the prognosis, but its prognostic significance still remains controversial. In addition, the social environment surrounding lymph node dissection has changed with the advent of limited surgery for peripheral small-sized lung cancer and emergence of immune check inhibitor (ICI). Therefore, we reconsidered the role of lymph node dissection.MethodsBy referring to past reports, we reviewed the process leading up to the establishment of SLND in lung cancer surgery. We compared five randomized prospective comparative studies on SLND and lymph node sampling (LNS) in lung cancer surgery.Key content and findingsOf the five randomized prospective comparative studies, two reported an improvement in overall survival (OS) with SLND, but the remaining three reported no significant difference in OS between SLND and LNS. One out of the five reports revealed a significant increase in complications with SLND. For peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases with tumor diameter ≤2 cm and consolidation-to-tumor ratio >0.5 segmentectomy was found to significantly improve the hazard ratio of OS, when compared to a lobectomy. However, the proportion of SLND and lobe-specific lymph node dissection (L-SLND) in each group seems to be unclear. In segmentectomy, the dissection of intersegmental lymph nodes tends to be lenient, and therefore it seems necessary to examine the significance of lymph node dissection in segmentectomy. ICIs are already showing excellent effects, and it may be necessary to examine how they will be affected by removal of regional lymph nodes where cancer-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are concentrated. SLND is essential for accurate staging, but ideally-in a host with no cancer cells in the lymph node or a host with cancer cells having a high sensitivity to ICI-it might be better to leave the regional lymph node.ConclusionsSLND may not be the right choice in all cases. A time may come when the extent of lymph node dissection is determined individually for each case. Future verification results are awaited.

Project description:IntroductionLung cancer is the primary cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The most effective treatment for early stage (I-II) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgical resection. However, the extent of mediastinal lymph nodes removal required and the impact of their removal remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the postoperative complications in patients with stage I-II NSCLC who received mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) or mediastinal lymph node sampling (MLNS).Methods and analysisAccording to the predefined inclusion criteria, we will conduct a comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies examining the postoperative complications of MLND compared to MLNS in patients with stage I-II NSCLC. The search will be performed across multiple databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, Sinomed, VIP, Duxiu, and Web of Science from inception to February 2024. Additionally, relevant literature references will be retrieved and hand searching of pertinent journals will be conducted. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment will be performed by two independent reviewers. Review Manager 5.4 will be applied in analyzing and synthesizing. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) will be used to assess the quality of evidence for the whole RCTs and used Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the methodologic quality of observational studies.Ethics and disseminationThis study did not include personal information. Ethical approval was not required for this study. This study is based on a secondary analysis of the literature, so ethical review approval is not required. The final report will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.ConclusionThis systematic review will contribute to compare the safety and survival benefits of these two surgical techniques for the treatment of early stage NSCLC, to further guide the selection of surgical approaches.Trial registrationThe protocol of the systematic review has been registered on Open Science Framework, with a registration number of DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/N2Y5D.

Dataset Information

The significance of systematic lymph node dissection in surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients aged ≤40 years.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The significance of systematic lymph node dissection in surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients aged ≤40 years.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets