Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Cerecyte coil trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms.


ABSTRACT:

Background and purpose

This study arose from a need to systematically evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of intracranial aneurysms treated with modified coils. We report the procedural safety and clinical outcomes in a prospective randomized controlled trial of endovascular coiling for ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, comparing polymer-loaded Cerecyte coils with bare platinum coils in 23 centers worldwide.

Materials and methods

Five hundred patients between 18 and 70 years of age with a ruptured or unruptured target aneurysm planning to undergo endovascular coiling were randomized to receive Cerecyte or bare platinum coils. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results

Two hundred forty-nine patients were allocated to Cerecyte coils and 251 to bare platinum coils. Baseline characteristics were balanced. For ruptured aneurysms, in-hospital mortality was 2/114 (1.8%) with Cerecyte versus 0/119 (0%) bare platinum coils. There were 8 (3.4%) adverse procedural events resulting in neurological deterioration: 5/114 (4.4%) with Cerecyte versus 3/119 (2.5%) with bare platinum coils (P = .22). The 6-month mRS score of ≤2 was not significantly different in 103/109 (94.5%) patients with Cerecyte and 110/112 (98.2%) patients with bare platinum coils. Poor outcome (mRS score of ≥3 or death) was 6/109 (5.5%) with Cerecyte versus 2/112 (1.8%) with bare platinum coils (P = .070). For UIAs, there was no in-hospital mortality. There were 7 (2.7%) adverse procedural events with neurological deterioration, 5/133 (3.8%) with Cerecyte versus 2/131 (1.5%) with bare platinum coils (P = .13). There was a 6-month mRS score of ≤2 in 114/119 (95.8%) patients with Cerecyte versus 123/123 (100%) patients with bare platinum coils. There was poor outcome (mRS ≥3 and 1 death) in 5/119 (4.2%) patients with Cerecyte versus 0/123 (0%) patients with bare platinum coils (P = .011).

Conclusions

There was a statistical excess of poor outcomes in the Cerecyte arm at discharge in the ruptured aneurysm group and at 6-month follow-up in the unruptured group. Overall adverse clinical outcomes and in-hospital mortality were exceptionally low in both groups.

SUBMITTER: Coley S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7966418 | biostudies-literature | 2012 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Cerecyte coil trial: procedural safety and clinical outcomes in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Coley S S   Sneade M M   Clarke A A   Mehta Z Z   Kallmes D D   Cekirge S S   Saatci I I   Roy D D   Molyneux A A  

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology 20111229 3


<h4>Background and purpose</h4>This study arose from a need to systematically evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of intracranial aneurysms treated with modified coils. We report the procedural safety and clinical outcomes in a prospective randomized controlled trial of endovascular coiling for ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms, comparing polymer-loaded Cerecyte coils with bare platinum coils in 23 centers worldwide.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Five hundred patients bet  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2010-03-04 | GSE15629 | GEO
2010-12-24 | GSE13353 | GEO
| S-EPMC11519314 | biostudies-literature
2010-05-08 | E-GEOD-15629 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC11603431 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7398535 | biostudies-literature
2010-12-24 | E-GEOD-13353 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC11344026 | biostudies-literature
| S-DIXA-D-1014 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7965039 | biostudies-literature