Dataset Information

Human plasma-derived alpha₁ -proteinase inhibitor in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

While circulating levels of alpha₁ -proteinase inhibitor (alpha₁ -PI) are typically normal, antiprotease activity appears to be compromised in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Because alpha₁ -PI [human] (alpha₁ -PI[h]) therapy can inhibit pro-inflammatory mediators associated with β-cell destruction and reduced insulin production, it has been proposed for T1DM disease prevention. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, tolerability, and efficacy of intravenous (IV) alpha₁ -PI[h] in preserving C-peptide production in newly diagnosed T1DM patients.

Participants

Seventy-six participants (aged 6-35 years) were randomized at 25 centers within 3 months of T1DM diagnosis.

Methods

A Phase II, multicenter, partially blinded, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept study evaluating four dosing regimens of alpha₁ -PI[h] (NCT02093221, GTI1302): weekly IV infusions of either 90 or 180 mg/kg, each for either 13 or 26 weeks. Safety and efficacy were monitored over 52 weeks with an efficacy evaluation planned at 104 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in the 2-h area-under-the-curve C-peptide level from a mixed-meal tolerance test at 52 weeks. A battery of laboratory tests, including inflammatory biomarkers, constituted exploratory efficacy variables.

Results

Infusions were well tolerated with no new safety signals. All groups exhibited highly variable declines in the primary outcome measure at 52 weeks with no statistically significant difference from placebo. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) was reduced from baseline in all alpha₁ -PI treatment groups but not the placebo group.

Conclusion

Pharmacologic therapy with alpha₁ -PI[h] is safe, well tolerated, and able to reduce IL-6 levels; however, due to variability in the efficacy endpoint, its effects on preservation of C-peptide production were inconclusive.

SUBMITTER: Lagarde WH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7984376 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Human plasma-derived alpha1 -proteinase inhibitor in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept study.

Lagarde William H WH Courtney Kecia L KL Reiner Barry B Steinmann Kimberly K Tsalikian Eva E Willi Steven M SM

Pediatric diabetes 20201213 2

<h4>Background</h4>While circulating levels of alpha1 -proteinase inhibitor (alpha1 -PI) are typically normal, antiprotease activity appears to be compromised in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Because alpha1 -PI [human] (alpha1 -PI[h]) therapy can inhibit pro-inflammatory mediators associated with β-cell destruction and reduced insulin production, it has been proposed for T1DM disease prevention. The aim of this study was to evaluate sa ...[more]

PMID: 33244872

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAugmentation therapy with plasma-derived α1-proteinase inhibitor (A1PI) products is currently the only approved disease-specific therapy for α1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD), a genetic disorder associated with decreased levels of A1PI. Systemic trough levels of A1PI in plasma or serum are widely accepted as a biochemical efficacy endpoint in clinical trials for A1PI products.MethodsRetrospective analyses utilizing data from three clinical studies in patients with AATD were conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic(s) (PK) and biochemical efficacy comparability of Aralast NP and two other A1PI augmentation therapies, Aralast and Prolastin. All three A1PI products were administered as either single or multiple 60 mg/kg intravenous infusions. PK and biochemical efficacy comparability analyses were conducted by evaluating antigenic and functional A1PI serum or plasma concentration data from each of the three studies.ResultsComparable PK parameters were demonstrated between the three products for antigenic A1PI levels following a single infusion, with baseline-corrected and uncorrected geometric mean ratios for peak and systemic exposure ranging from 89.0% to 99.6%, with 90% confidence intervals within the 80-125% reference interval for bioequivalence. Biochemical efficacy comparability analyses of Aralast and Prolastin after multiple infusions at steady state showed geometric mean ratios for uncorrected and baseline-corrected antigenic and functional A1PI trough concentrations over weeks 8-11, and for individual weeks, that ranged from 75.8% to 106.6%, with the majority of the 90% confidence intervals falling either within the 80-125% interval or in proximity to it. Nonparametric superpositioning at steady state suggested that predicted trough concentrations for Aralast NP were comparable to the observed concentrations for Aralast and Prolastin.ConclusionThese retrospective analyses provide robust evidence that Aralast NP has biochemical efficacy and PK comparable to that of Aralast and Prolastin, supporting the use of any of these A1PI products for the treatment of patients with AATD.Trial registration numbersClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT00242385 and NCT00396006.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough total plasma lipoproteome consists of proteins that have shown promises as biomarkers that can identify Alzheimer's disease (AD), effect sizes are modest. The objective of this study is to provide initial proof-of-concept that the plasma lipoproteome more likely differ between AD cases and controls when measured in individual plasma lipoprotein fractions than when measured as total in immunodepleted plasma.MethodsWe first developed a targeted proteomics method based on selected reaction monitoring (SRM) and liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry for measurement of 120 tryptic peptides from 79 proteins that are commonly present in plasma lipoproteins. Then in a proof-of concept case-control study of 5 AD cases and 5 sex- and age-matched controls, we applied the targeted proteomic method and performed relatively quantification of 120 tryptic peptides in plasma lipoprotein fractions (fractionated by sequential gradient ultracentrifugation) and in immunodepleted plasma (of albumin and IgG). Unadjusted p values from two-sample t-tests and overall fold change was used to evaluate a peptide relative difference between AD cases and controls, with lower p values (< 0.05) or greater fold differences (> 1.05 or < 0.95) suggestive of greater peptide/protein differences.ResultsWithin-day and between-days technical precisions (mean %CV [SD] of all SRM transitions) of the targeted proteomic method were 3.95% (2.65) and 9.31% (5.59), respectively. Between-days technical precisions (mean % CV [SD]) of the entire plasma lipoproteomic workflow including plasma lipoprotein fractionation was 27.90% (14.61). Ten tryptic peptides that belonged to 5 proteins in plasma lipoproteins had unadjusted p values < 0.05, compared to no peptides in immunodepleted plasma. Furthermore, 27, 32, 17, and 20 tryptic peptides in VLDL, IDL, LDL and HDL, demonstrated overall peptide fold differences > 1.05 or < 0.95, compared to only 6 tryptic peptides in immunodepleted plasma. The overall comparisons, therefore, suggested greater peptide/protein differences in plasma lipoproteome when measured in individual plasma lipoproteins than as total in immunodepleted plasma. Specifically, protein complement C3's peptide IHWESASLLR, had unadjusted p values of 0.00007, 0.00012, and 0.0006 and overall 1.25, 1.17, 1.14-fold changes in VLDL, IDL, and LDL, respectively. After positive False Discovery Rate (pFDR) adjustment, the complement C3 peptide IHWESASLLR in VLDL remained statistically different (adjusted p value < 0.05).DiscussionThe findings may warrant future studies to investigate plasma lipoproteome when measured in individual plasma lipoprotein fractions for AD diagnosis.

Project description:BackgroundWe assessed the impact of retinoid X receptor (RXR) agonist bexarotene on brain amyloid measured by amyloid imaging in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a proof-of-concept trial.MethodsTwenty patients with AD [Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 10-20 inclusive] with positive florbetapir scans were randomized to receive 300 mg of bexarotene or placebo for 4 weeks. The amyloid imaging result was the primary outcome. Whole-population analyses and prespecified analyses by genotype [apolipoprotein E ε4 (ApoE4) carriers and ApoE4 noncarriers] were conducted. Secondary outcomes included scores on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living scale, MMSE, Clinical Dementia Rating scale, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Serum amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide sequences Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 measurements were collected as biomarker outcomes.ResultsThere was no change in the composite or regional amyloid burden when all patients were included in the analysis. ApoE4 noncarriers showed a significant reduction in brain amyloid on the composite measure in five of six regional measurements. No change in amyloid burden was observed in ApoE4 carriers. There was a significant association between increased serum Aβ1-42 and reductions in brain amyloid in ApoE4 noncarriers (not in carriers). There were significant elevations in serum triglycerides in bexarotene-treated patients. There was no consistent change in any clinical measure.ConclusionsThe primary outcome of this trial was negative. The data suggest that bexarotene reduced brain amyloid and increased serum Aβ1-42 in ApoE4 noncarriers. Elevated triglycerides could represent a cardiovascular risk, and bexarotene should not be administered outside a research setting. RXR agonists warrant further investigations as AD therapies.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01782742 . Registered 29 January 2013.