Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion requires sampling of the arterial input function (AIF). While variation in the AIF sampling location is known to impact quantification by CMR and positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion, there is no evidence to support the use of a specific location based on their diagnostic accuracy in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of stress MBF and MPR for different AIF sampling locations for the detection of abnormal myocardial perfusion with expert visual assessment as the reference.Methods
Twenty-five patients with suspected or known CAD underwent vasodilator stress-rest perf
SUBMITTER: Milidonis X
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8006361 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature