Dataset Information

[Low dose radiotherapy for COVID-19 pneumopathy: Biological rationale and literature review].

ABSTRACT: The world has now been facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since over a year. If most of clinical presentations are benign, fragile patients are at greater risk of developing severe or fatal lung disease. Many therapies have been explored with very low impact on mortality. In this context, Kirkby et Mackenzie have published in April 2020 a report reminding the anti-inflammatory properties of low-dose radiotherapy (delivering less than 1Gy) and its use in the treatment of viral and bacterial pneumopathies before antibiotics era. Large in vivo and in vitro data have demonstrated the biological rationale and anti-inflammatory activity of low-dose radiotherapy in many pathologies. Over the past year, three phase I/II clinical trials have been published, as well as one randomized controlled trial, reporting the feasibility and the clinical and biological improvement of a 0.5 to 1Gy treatment dose to the entire lung. 13 other studies, including a randomized phase III trial, are currently ongoing worldwide. These studies may provide data in the effect of low-dose radiotherapy in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. This article explains biological rationale of low-dose radiotherapy, and reports already published or ongoing studies on low-dose radiotherapy for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

SUBMITTER: Miran C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8040522 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

[Low dose radiotherapy for COVID-19 pneumopathy: Biological rationale and literature review].

Miran C C Bonnet É É Allignet B B Clippe S S El Hedi Zouai M M Bosset M M Fleury B B Guy J-B JB

Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique 20210409 5

The world has now been facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) since over a year. If most of clinical presentations are benign, fragile patients are at greater risk of developing severe or fatal lung disease. Many therapies have been explored with very low impact on mortality. In this context, Kirkby et Mackenzie have published in April 2020 a report reminding the anti-inflammatory properties of low-dose radi ...[more]

PMID: 33903009

Similar Datasets

Project description:The inflammatory response to COVID-19 is specifically associated with an impaired type I interferon (IFN) response and complete blockade of IFN-β secretion. Clinically, nebulization of IFN-α-2b has been historically used in China to treat viral pneumonia associated with SARS-CoV. Very recent data show that the use of inhaled type I IFN is associated with decreased mortality in Chinese COVID-19 patients. However, IFN nebulization is currently not standard in Europe and the United States. Therefore, our group has set up a project aimed to evaluate the possibility to nebulize IFN-β-1b (a drug currently used in Europe to treat multiple sclerosis via subcutaneous injections) and to assess the safety of this new mode of administration in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. We present here literature data that allowed us to build our hypothesis and to develop collaboration between clinical pharmacists, intensivists and nebulization engineers in order to gain first pre-clinical and clinical experience of IFN-β-1b nebulization. After validation of the nebulization method and verification of droplet size compatible with nebulization, the method has been applied to four intensive care patients treated at our university hospital, for whom none of the COVID-19 therapies initially used in France led to significant clinical improvement. All patients exhibited negative viral carriage and experienced clinical improvement 7-16 days after having initiated nebulized IFN-β-1b inhalation therapy. No side effects were observed. All patients were alive within a 90-days follow-up. Although it is not possible to draw firm conclusions on treatment efficacy based on this case report, our study shows that pulmonary IFN-β-1b administration is feasible, with a good safety profile. This procedure, which presents the advantage of directly targeting the lungs and reducing the risks of systemic side effects, may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for the care of patients with severe COVID-19. However, our preliminary observation requires confirmation by randomized controlled trials.

Project description:PurposeThe respiratory disease COVID-19 reached global pandemic status in 2020. Excessive inflammation is believed to result in the most severe symptoms and death from this disease. Because treatment options for patients with severe COVID-19 related pulmonary symptoms remain limited, whole-lung low-dose radiation therapy is being evaluated as an anti-inflammatory modality. However, there is concern about the long-term risks associated with low-dose pulmonary irradiation. To help quantify the benefit-risk balance of low-dose radiation therapy for COVID-19, we estimated radiation-induced lifetime risks of both lung cancer and heart disease (major coronary events) for patients of different sexes, treated at ages 50 to 85, with and without other relevant risk factors (cigarette smoking and baseline heart disease risk).Methods and materialsThese estimates were generated by combining state-of-the-art radiation risk models for lung cancer and for heart disease together with background lung cancer and heart disease risks and age/sex-dependent survival probabilities for the U.S.PopulationResultsEstimated absolute radiation-induced risks were generally higher for lung cancer compared with major coronary events. The highest estimated lifetime radiation-induced lung cancer risks were approximately 6% for female smokers treated between ages 50 and 60. The highest estimated radiation-induced heart disease risks were approximately 3% for males or females with high heart disease risk factors and treated between ages 50 and 60.ConclusionsThe estimated summed lifetime risk of lung cancer and major coronary events reached up to 9% in patients with high baseline risk factors. Predicted lung cancer and heart disease risks were lowest in older nonsmoking patients and patients with few cardiac risk factors. These long-term risk estimates, along with consideration of possible acute reactions, should be useful in assessing the benefit-risk balance for low-dose radiation therapy to treat severe COVID-19 pulmonary symptoms, and suggest that background risk factors, particularly smoking, should be taken into account in such assessments.

Dataset Information

[Low dose radiotherapy for COVID-19 pneumopathy: Biological rationale and literature review].

Publications

[Low dose radiotherapy for COVID-19 pneumopathy: Biological rationale and literature review].

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets