Dataset Information

Opportunities for successful de-escalation of proton pump inhibitors at a federally qualified health center.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) de-escalation initiative was piloted at a Family Medicine Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) after a needs assessment showed that PPIs were prescribed inappropriately. The objective was to evaluate implementation of a PPI de-escalation program for an urban, underinsured patient population at a (FQHC).

Methods

Patients receiving PPI with an upcoming appointment with their primary care provider (PCP) were evaluated by a pharmacist for the appropriateness of therapy. The pharmacist administered a questionnaire to patients to assess PPI usage patterns and then evaluated for appropriate PPI therapy which included diagnoses, risk factors for gastrointestinal bleed, symptom control, and duration of PPI therapy. For consenting patients, de-escalation was implemented per pharmacist protocol.

Results

A total of 36 patients were evaluated for appropriate PPI use, among those, 21 (58%) were eligible for de-escalation, and 19 agreed to de-escalation. Fifteen patients (15/19) had successful PPI de-escalation after 4 weeks without discomfort or symptoms which disrupted daily activities.

Conclusions

This pharmacist led initiative in collaboration with PCPs resulted in successful de-escalation of PPIs in an underserved primary care setting.

SUBMITTER: Ayoub J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8052786 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Opportunities for successful de-escalation of proton pump inhibitors at a federally qualified health center.

Ayoub Joelle J McGregor Jessina C JC Castner Rebecca M RM Singh Harleen H

BMC pharmacology & toxicology 20210416 1

<h4>Background</h4>A Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) de-escalation initiative was piloted at a Family Medicine Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) after a needs assessment showed that PPIs were prescribed inappropriately. The objective was to evaluate implementation of a PPI de-escalation program for an urban, underinsured patient population at a (FQHC).<h4>Methods</h4>Patients receiving PPI with an upcoming appointment with their primary care provider (PCP) were evaluated by a pharmacist for t ...[more]

PMID: 33863393

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo understand factors associated with federally qualified health center (FQHC) financial performance.Study designWe used multivariate linear regression to identify correlates of health center financial performance. We examined six measures of health center financial performance across four domains: margin (operating margin), liquidity (days cash on hand [DCOH], current ratio), solvency (debt-to-equity ratio), and others (net patient accounts receivable days, personnel-related expenses). We examined potential correlates of financial performance, including characteristics of the patient population, health center organization, and location/geography.Data sourcesWe use 2012-2017 Uniform Data System (UDS) files, financial audit data from Capital link, and publicly available data.Data collection/extraction methodsWe focused on health centers in the 50 US states and District of Columbia, which reported information to UDS for at least 1 year between 2012 and 2017 and had Capital link financial audit data.Principal findingsFQHC financial performance generally improved over the study period, especially from 2015 to 2017. In multivariate regression models, a higher percentage of Medicaid patients was associated with better margins (operating margin: 0.06, p < 0.001), liquidity (DCOH: 0.67, p < 0.001; current ratio: 0.28, p = 0.001), and solvency (debt-to equity ratio: -0.08, p = 0.004). Moreover, a staffing mix comprised of more nonphysician providers was associated with better margin (operating margin: 0.21, p = 0.001) and liquidity (current ratio: 1.12, p < 0.001) measures. Patient-centered medical home (PCMH) recognition was also associated with better liquidity (DCOH: 19.01, p < 0.001; current ratio: 4.68, p = 0.014) and solvency (debt-to-equity ratio: -2.03, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe financial health of FQHCs improved with provisions of the Affordable Care Act, which included significant Medicaid expansion and direct funding support for health centers. FQHC financial health was also associated with key staffing and operating characteristics of health centers. Maintaining the financial health of FQHCs is critical to their ability to continuously provide affordable and high-quality care in medically underserved areas.

Project description:BackgroundEngaging frontline clinicians and staff in quality improvement is a promising bottom-up approach to transforming primary care practices. This may be especially true in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and similar safety-net settings where large-scale, top-down transformation efforts are often associated with declining worker morale and increasing burnout. Innovation contests, which decentralize problem-solving, can be used to involve frontline workers in idea generation and selection.ObjectiveWe aimed to describe the ideas that frontline clinicians and staff suggested via organizational innovation contests in a national sample of 54 FQHCs.InterventionsInnovation contests solicited ideas for improving care from all frontline workers-regardless of professional expertise, job title, and organizational tenure and excluding those in senior management-and offered opportunities to vote on ideas.ParticipantsA total of 1,417 frontline workers across all participating FQHCs generated 2,271 improvement opportunities.ApproachesWe performed a content analysis and organized the ideas into codes (e.g., standardization, workplace perks, new service, staff relationships, community development) and categories (e.g., operations, employees, patients).Key resultsIdeas from frontline workers in participating FQHCs called attention to standardization (n = 386, 17%), staffing (n = 244, 11%), patient experience (n = 223, 10%), staff training (n = 145, 6%), workplace perks (n = 142, 6%), compensation (n = 101, 5%), new service (n = 92, 4%), management-staff relationships (n = 82, 4%), and others. Voting results suggested that staffing resources, standardization, and patient communication were key issues among workers.ConclusionsInnovation contests generated numerous ideas for improvement from the frontline. It is likely that the issues described in this study have become even more salient today, as the COVID-19 pandemic has had devastating impacts on work environments and health/social needs of patients living in low-resourced communities. Continued work is needed to promote learning and information exchange about opportunities to improve and transform practices between policymakers, managers, and providers and staff at the frontlines.

Project description:ObjectiveScreening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) is a systematic approach to identification and intervention for individuals at risk for substance use disorders. Prior research indicates that SBIRT is underutilized in pediatric primary care. Yet few studies have examined procedures for identifying and addressing substance use in clinics that serve publicly insured adolescents (i.e., federally qualified health centers [FQHC]). This descriptive, multi-method study assessed adolescent substance use frequency and provider perspectives to inform SBIRT implementation in an urban pediatric FQHC in California.MethodsA medical record review assessed substance use frequency and correlates among publicly insured adolescents aged 12-17 years who completed a well-child visit in pediatric primary care between 2014 and 2017 (N = 2252). Data on substance use (i.e., alcohol, illicit drugs, and tobacco) were from a health assessment tool mandated by Medicaid. Semi-structured interviews with 12 providers (i.e., pediatricians, nurse practitioners, behavioral health clinicians) elicited information about the current clinic workflow for adolescent substance use and barriers and facilitators to SBIRT implementation.ResultsOf 1588 adolescents who completed the assessment (70.5%), 6.8% reported current substance use. Self-reported use was highest among non-Hispanic Black (15.2%) adolescents and those with co-occurring depressive symptoms (14.4%). Provider-reported challenges to implementing SBIRT included a lack of space for confidential screening and a lack of referral options. Providers favored implementing technology-based tools such as tablets for adolescent pre-visit screening and electronic medical record-based decision support to facilitate brief intervention and treatment referrals.ConclusionsThis study fills a substantial research gap by examining factors that impede and support SBIRT implementation in pediatric FQHC settings. Successful SBIRT implementation in these settings could significantly reduce the unmet need for substance use treatment among uninsured and publicly insured adolescents. Pediatric primary care and urgent care providers perceived SBIRT to be feasible, and health information and digital technologies may facilitate the integration of SBIRT into clinic workflows. Ensuring confidentiality for screening and expanding referral options for adolescents in need of community-based addiction treatment are also critical to increasing SBIRT uptake.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate whether the expansion of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) improved late prenatal care initiation, low birth weight, and preterm birth among Medicaid-covered or uninsured individuals.Data sources and study settingWe identified all FQHCs in California using the Health Resources and Services Administration's Uniform Data System from 2000 to 2019. We used data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey to describe area characteristics. We measured outcomes in California birth certificate data from 2007 to 2019.Study designWe compared areas that received their first FQHC between 2011 and 2016 to areas that received it later or that had never had an FQHC. Specifically, we used a synthetic control with a staggered adoption approach to calculate non-parametric estimates of the average treatment effects on the treated areas. The key outcome variables were the rate of Medicaid or uninsured births with late prenatal care initiation (>3 months' gestation), with low birth weight (<2500 grams), or with preterm birth (<37 weeks' gestation).Data collection/extraction methodsThe analysis was limited to births covered by Medicaid or that were uninsured, as indicated on the birth certificate.Principal findingsThe 55 areas in California that received their first FQHC in 2011-2016 were more populous; their residents were more likely to be covered by Medicaid, to be low-income, or to be Hispanic than residents of the 48 areas that did not have an FQHC by the end of the study period. We found no statistically significant impact of the first FQHC on rates of late prenatal care initiation (ATT: -10.4 [95% CI -38.1, 15.0]), low birth weight (ATT: 0.2 [95% CI -7.1, 5.4]), or preterm birth (ATT: -7.0 [95% CI -15.5, 2.3]).ConclusionsOur results from California suggest that access to primary and prenatal care may not be enough to improve these outcomes. Future work should evaluate the impact of ongoing initiatives to increase access to maternal health care at FQHCs through targeted workforce investments.

Dataset Information

Opportunities for successful de-escalation of proton pump inhibitors at a federally qualified health center.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Opportunities for successful de-escalation of proton pump inhibitors at a federally qualified health center.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets