Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
To assess the methodological quality of individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis and to identify areas for improvement.Design
Systematic review.Data sources
Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies
Systematic reviews with IPD meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials on intervention effects published in English.Results
323 IPD meta-analyses covering 21 clinical areas and published between 1991 and 2019 were included: 270 (84%) were non-Cochrane reviews and 269 (84%) were published in journals with a high impact factor (top quarter). The IPD meta-analyses showed low compliance in using a satisfactory technique to assess the risk of bias of the included randomised contr
SUBMITTER: Wang H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8054226 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature