A Clampless Aortoprosthetic End to Side Anastomotic Device with Large Diameter Aortic Puncher.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
To facilitate safe anastomosis of a vascular prosthesis onto the proximal ascending aorta without side clamping, a clampless anastomotic device with large diameter aortic puncher was developed.Report
First, a vascular prosthesis is anastomosed onto the aorta without making a hole, then the aortic wall within the prosthesis is punched out using the device.Discussion
After further refinement of the present device, endovascular surgery with debranching could be performed more safely and quickly.
SUBMITTER: Sasajima T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8077719 | biostudies-literature | 2020
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
A Clampless Aortoprosthetic End to Side Anastomotic Device with Large Diameter Aortic Puncher.
Sasajima Tadahiro T Saito Yukihiro Y Ise Hayato H Uchida Daiki D Kamiya Hiroyuki H
EJVES vascular forum 20200227
<h4>Introduction</h4>To facilitate safe anastomosis of a vascular prosthesis onto the proximal ascending aorta without side clamping, a clampless anastomotic device with large diameter aortic puncher was developed.<h4>Report</h4>First, a vascular prosthesis is anastomosed onto the aorta without making a hole, then the aortic wall within the prosthesis is punched out using the device.<h4>Discussion</h4>After further refinement of the present device, endovascular surgery with debranching could be ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe use of coupler devices has become mainstream in microsurgical end-to-end venous anastomoses (EEA) for free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Reports about end-to-side venous anastomoses (ESA) using a coupler are scarce, though.MethodsThe surgical technique of end-to-side anastomosis using a coupler device is described. End-to-side anastomoses and end-to-end anastomoses with a vascular coupler are compared with respect to postoperative vascular complications.Results124 patients were included, 76 with EEA, 48 with ESA. Postoperative venous complications occurred in 5.3% and 2.1%, respectively.ConclusionsESA is a valuable alternative to EEA when using a coupler device providing more flexibility to the surgeon.
| S-EPMC10477101 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The present study aimed to investigate whether side-to-end anastomosis could provide an improved surgical outcome, such as lower anastomotic leakage rate, compared with end-to-end anastomosis, following anterior resection for rectal and rectosigmoid cancer. This retrospective study included 162 patients with rectal cancer who underwent elective anterior resection between January 2012 and October 2019 at a single institution. Patients with double cancers or colonic J-pouch were excluded. Anastomotic leakage was defined clinically and radiologically. Side-to-end anastomosis was introduced in the International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital in January 2017. Side-to-end anastomosis was performed in 63 patients, while end-to-end anastomosis was performed in 99 patients. Tumors tended to be located lower in the rectum in the side-to-end anastomosis group than in the end-to-end anastomosis group. No significant differences were observed in other patient characteristics. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was significantly lower in the side-to-end anastomosis group than in the end-to-end anastomosis group (3/63, 4.8% vs. 18/99, 18.2%, respectively, P=0.02). No significant differences were observed in the incidence rates of other complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that a smoking habit (P=0.04) and side-to-end anastomosis (P=0.02) were significantly associated with anastomotic leakage. In conclusion, side-to-end anastomosis using a double-stapling technique following anterior resection for rectal cancer may prevent anastomotic leakage.
| S-EPMC8739073 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Vertically dynamic model of a large-diameter pile in frozen soil is established, in which the frozen soil is described to a saturated frozen porous media, and the large diameter end-bearing pile is simplified to a one-dimensional rod considering the influence of the transverse inertia effect. Analytical solutions of the longitudinal coupling vibration between the end-bearing pile and the frozen soil are obtained using Helmholtz decomposition and variable separation methods in the frequency domain. By comparing the dynamic responses of the longitudinal vibration of the large diameter end-bearing pile with the traditionally one-dimensional pile, as well as the impedance factor of the frozen soil layer induced by the pile vibration, these demonstrate the influence of the transverse inertia effect on the high frequency vibration of large diameter pile is significant, and the influence on the pile with a smaller slenderness ratio is larger. The temperature and the Poisson's ratio also have significant effects on the vertical vibration of large diameter piles in frozen soil, which cannot be ignored in the analysis.
| S-EPMC10770332 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAortic coarctation (CoA) is a congenital heart disease that usually combines various cardiovascular malformations, including hypoplastic aortic arch (HAA). We explore end-to-side anastomosis (ESA) and autologous pulmonary artery patch (APAP) in CoA with HAA, to provide more clinical experience.MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective study. The target population is patients with aortic stenosis and HAA who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2021. All cases included were consecutive, and no instances were omitted due to absent data, lack of consent, or other factors. Collect information on gender, age, and weight at the time of the operation, detailed information on the constricted segment and pressure gradient evaluated by echocardiography and computed tomography (CT), and other factors of patients, and these data were analyzed by statistical methods.ResultsNinety-six patients (67 males and 29 females) with median age of 76 (41.75, 128.50) days and median weight of 4.20 (3.70, 5.10) kg were enrolled. The follow-up period was 46.20 (34.40, 54.70) months. The patients were divided into two groups based on surgery: ESA (G1, 59) and APAP (G2, 37). The combined cardiovascular malformations were treated simultaneously. None of the patients had neurological events or renal failure, and three died early after the operation. Finally, 93 patients were successfully followed-up. Cox regression showed that ESA was a risk factor for aortic arch geometry is closer to Gothic (G-AAg), elevated blood pressure (EBp), and aortic recoarctation (reCoA) after surgery. In G1, 18 patients had G-AAg (P=0.03), 13 had EBp (P=0.041), and 12 had reCoA (P=0.041), all of which were significantly higher than those in G2 (three had G-AAg, one of whom had EBp and reCoA).ConclusionsIt is safe and effective to repair CoA and HAA and other cardiovascular malformations through one-stage median sternotomy. Compared with ESA, APAP can lower the risks of G-AAg, EBp, and reCoA. Although APAP takes longer, the proper application of selective antegrade cerebral perfusion may lower the risks. We recommend expanding the indications for APAP when circumstances allow, which will benefit patients.
| S-EPMC11898331 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study compares short-term (30 days) and intermediate term (3 years) clinical outcomes in patients with large (≥31 mm) versus small aortic neck diameters (≤28 and ≤31 mm).MethodsProspectively collected data from 741 patients who underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair were analyzed. Some surgeons have reported the threshold for a large aortic neck for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair to be 28 mm, whereas for others it is 31 mm. Therefore, we classified aortic neck diameter into less than or equal to 28 versus greater than 28 mm; and less than or equal to 31 versus greater than 31 mm. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare outcomes.ResultsThere were 688 patients who had a defined aortic neck diameter: 592 with less than or equal to 28 mm, 96 with greater than 28 mm, 655 with less than or equal to 31 mm, and 33 with greater than 31 mm. The mean follow-up was 25.2 months for less than or equal to 31 mm versus 31.8 months for greater than 31 mm. Clinical characteristics were similar in all groups, except that there were more patients outside the instructions for use in the greater than 31 mm versus less than or equal to 31 mm group (94% vs 44%; P < .0001). There was a significant increase in early type I endoleak for patients with an aortic neck diameter of greater than 31 versus less than or equal to 31 mm (9 [27%] vs 74 [11%]; P = .01); late type I endoleaks (4 [14%] vs 18 [3%]; P = .01); sac expansion (5 [17%] vs 28 [5%]; P = .01); late intervention (5 [17%] vs 23 [4%]; P = .01); and death (9 [31%] vs 48 [8%]; P < .0001). There were no differences in outcomes between the patients with greater than 28 mm aortic neck diameters and the less than or equal to 28 mm diameters. Freedom from late type I endoleak at 1, 2, and 3 years were 96%, 88%, and 88% for patients with a neck diameter of greater than 31 mm versus 97%, 97%, and 97% for a diameter less than or equal to 31 mm (P = .19). The rate of freedom from sac expansion for patients with a diameter greater than 31 mm was 88%, 81%, and 81% at 1, 2, and 3 years versus 99%, 97%, and 92% for a diameter less than or equal to 31 mm (P = .02). Freedom from late intervention for 1, 2, and 3 years for patients with a diameter greater than 31 mm were 91%, 91%, and 91% versus 99%, 97%, and 96% for those with a diameter less than or equal to 31 mm. Survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years for a diameter greater than 31 mm were 83%, 74%, and 68% versus 96%, 92%, and 90% for a diameter less than or equal to 31 mm (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with a diameter greater than 31 mm had an odds ratio of 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-16.8) for mortality, 4.7 (95% CI, 1.4-15.5) for sac expansion, and 4.9 (95% CI, 1.4-17.4) for late type I endoleak.ConclusionsPatients with large aortic neck diameters (>31 mm) had higher rates of early and late type I endoleak, sac expansion, late intervention, and mortality.
| S-EPMC6203596 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10073850 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCurrent indication for concomitant replacement of ascending aorta (AA) in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement is that AA diameter exceeds 45 mm. However, the impact of AA dilation (≥45 mm) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 467 consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR from January 2016 to April 2021. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify risk factors for all-cause mortality. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were the occurrence of the aortic dissection and/or rupture.ResultsOne hundred patients (21.4%) presented preoperative AA ≥45 mm. The median age was 73 years for patients with AA ≥45 mm and 75 years for patients with AA <45 mm (P=0.021). The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.1%. There was no iatrogenic injury to the AA. Only one patient (0.2%) in AA <45 mm group experienced retrograde type B aortic dissection in the descending aorta. The median follow-up was 19 [16-34] months in patients with AA ≥45 mm and 27 [15-37] months in patients with AA <45 mm (P=0.152). No statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding the overall survival (92.5%±3.5% vs. 78.3%±6.8%, P=0.198). Only one patient in AA <45 mm group experienced type A aortic dissection 10 months after the procedure. In both univariable and multivariable analysis, AA ≥45 mm was not an independent predictor for all-cause mortality.ConclusionsTransfemoral TAVR can be performed safely in patients with preoperative AA ≥45 mm with a low intraprocedural risk. The mid-term survival appears not to be affected by the presence of AA ≥45 mm, and adverse aortic events are rare.
| S-EPMC10753242 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDevelopment of a parastomal hernia is common following abdominoperineal excision (APE). The true incidence is difficult to assess fully owing to differing lengths of follow-up and techniques used to assess herniation; radiological or clinical. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate colostomy diameter by studying the rate of change of axial and sagittal trephine diameters, trephine area, and the ratio of the trephine over time. A secondary aim was to investigate variation in trephine area and variables affecting parasternal hernia over time.MethodsSerial CT scans performed after APE from January 2006 to December 2014 were reviewed. Variables analysed included age, sex, trephine position relative to rectus abdominis muscle (RAM), type of incision for stoma creation, and axial and sagittal trephine diameters measured on follow-up CT. A Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework was used to examine the relationship of trephine diameters, area and ratio over time.ResultsOf 112 patients undergoing APE, 103 were eligible for analysis; this included 91 colostomies (88·3 per cent) through the RAM and 12 (11·7 per cent) lateral to the RAM. Median age of the patients was 68 years. Sixty patients (58·3 per cent) had a circular and 43 (41·7 per cent) a cruciate incision for stoma creation. The sagittal trephine diameter increased by 0·22 (95 per cent credible interval 0·12 to 0·32) mm/month for both sexes. Women reported a significant increase in axial trephine diameters; the male : female ratio difference was -0·17 (-0·30 to -0·03) mm/month and for trephine areas -6·21 (0·96 to 13·7) mm2/month. Patient age, colostomy trephine location and shape of incision were not statistically significant variables for parasternal hernia.ConclusionFemale sex was the only variable affecting the rate of increase in axial trephine diameter and trephine area over time.
| S-EPMC6354228 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAortic dissection is a life-threatening complication of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy. In these populations, whilst prophylactic replacement of proximal thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is generally recommended at threshold diameters ≥5.5 cm, dissection may occur in smaller aortas. An alternative size-based parameter, the cross-sectional aortic area/patient height ratio (indexed aortic area, IAA), correlates with increased dissection risk at abnormal values > 10 cm2/m. We sought to assess the utility of the IAA in identifying at-risk BAV-associated TAAs with abnormal IAA, albeit with sub-threshold aortic diameter.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively identified 69 patients with BAV-associated TAAs who underwent surgical repair between 2010 and 2016. Aortic diameter was measured on pre-operative imaging, and IAA calculated, at the mid-sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta for each patient. We determined proportions of aneurysms with IAA >10 cm2/m, median IAAs corresponding to aortic diameters <4.0 cm, 4.0-4.5 cm, 4.5-5.0 cm, 5.0-5.5 cm and >5.5 cm, and median aortic diameters corresponding to an abnormal IAA.Results50.9%, 12.5% and 64.6% of aneurysms at the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. 51.9% and 88.9% of patients with aortic diameter 4.5-5.0 cm and 5.0-5.5 cm, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. In aneurysms with abnormal IAA involving the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction, and mid-ascending aorta, median aortic diameters were 4.98 cm, 5.04 cm and 5.11 cm, respectively. Overall, 57/72 (79.2%) at-risk aneurysms with IAA >10 cm2/m had diameters smaller than the 5.5 cm guideline cut-off for surgical intervention.ConclusionSignificant proportions of BAV-associated TAAs are at increased risk of aortic dissection attending an IAA >10 cm2/m, whilst not fulfilling the size criteria indicating aortic surgery in contemporary guidelines. Further analysis of IAA in larger BAV cohorts is necessary to clarify its role in patient selection and optimal timing for prophylactic aortic replacement.
| S-EPMC8102153 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveAscending thoracic aortic aneurysms carry a risk of acute type A dissection. Elective repair guidelines are designed around size thresholds, but the 1-dimensional parameter of maximum diameter cannot predict acute events in small aneurysms. Biomechanically, dissection can occur when wall stress exceeds strength. Patient-specific ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm wall stresses may be a better predictor of dissection. Our aim was to compare wall stresses in tricuspid aortic valve-associated ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms based on diameter.MethodsPatients with tricuspid aortic valve-associated ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm and diameter 4.0 cm or greater (n = 221) were divided into groups by 0.5-cm diameter increments. Three-dimensional geometries were reconstructed from computed tomography images, and finite element models were developed taking into account prestress geometries. A fiber-embedded hyperelastic material model was applied to obtain longitudinal and circumferential wall stress distributions under systolic pressure. Median stresses with interquartile ranges were determined. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons between size groups.ResultsPeak longitudinal wall stresses for tricuspid aortic valve-associated ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm were 290 (265-323) kPa for size 4.0 to 4.4 cm versus 330 (296-359) kPa for 4.5 to 4.9 cm versus 339 (320-373) kPa for 5.0 to 5.4 cm versus 318 (293-351) kPa for 5.5 to 5.9 cm versus 373 (363-449) kPa for 6.0 cm or greater (P = 8.7e-8). Peak circumferential wall stresses were 460 (421-543) kPa for size 4.0 to 4.4 cm versus 503 (453-569) kPa for 4.5 to 4.9 cm versus 549 (430-588) kPa for 5.0 to 5.4 cm versus 540 (471-608) kPa for 5.5 to 5.9 cm versus 596 (506-649) kPa for 6.0 cm or greater (P = .0007).ConclusionsCircumferential and longitudinal wall stresses are higher as diameter increases, but size groups had large overlap of stress ranges. Wall stress thresholds based on aneurysm wall strength may be a better predictor of patient-specific risk of dissection than diameter in small ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms.
| S-EPMC8716675 | biostudies-literature