Test-retest reliability of approach-avoidance conflict decision-making during functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy adults.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Neural and behavioral mechanisms during approach-avoidance conflict decision-making are relevant across various psychiatric disorders, particularly anxiety disorders. Studies using approach-avoidance conflict paradigms in healthy adults have identified preliminary neural mechanisms, but findings must be replicated and demonstrated as reliable before further application. This study sought to replicate previous findings and examine test-retest reliability of behavioral (approach behavior, reaction time) and neural (regions of interest [ROIs]) responses during an approach-avoidance conflict task conducted during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Thirty healthy adults completed an approach-avoidance conflict task during fMRI on two occasions (mean interval: 17 days; range: 11-32).
SUBMITTER: McDermott TJ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8090786 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA