Dataset Information

Comparative Efficacy of the Novel Diarylquinoline TBAJ-587 and Bedaquiline against a Resistant Rv0678 Mutant in a Mouse Model of Tuberculosis.

ABSTRACT: Since its conditional approval in 2012, bedaquiline (BDQ) has been a valuable tool for treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. More recently, a novel short-course regimen combining BDQ with pretomanid and linezolid won approval to treat highly drug-resistant tuberculosis. Clinical reports of emerging BDQ resistance have identified mutations in Rv0678 that derepress the expression of the MmpL5/MmpS5 efflux transporter as the most common cause. Because the effect of these mutations on bacterial susceptibility to BDQ is relatively small (e.g., 2 to 8× MIC shift), increasing the BDQ dose would increase antibacterial activity but also pose potential safety concerns, including QTc prolongation. Substitution of BDQ with another diarylquinoline with superior potency and/or safety has the potential to overcome these limitations. TBAJ-587 has greater in vitro potency than BDQ, including against Rv0678 mutants, and may offer a larger safety margin. Using a mouse model of tuberculosis and different doses of BDQ and TBAJ-587, we found that against wild-type M. tuberculosis H37Rv and an isogenic Rv0678 mutant, TBAJ-587 has greater efficacy against both strains than BDQ, whether alone or in combination with pretomanid and either linezolid or moxifloxacin and pyrazinamide. TBAJ-587 also reduced the emergence of resistance to diarylquinolines and pretomanid.

SUBMITTER: Xu J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8097419 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative Efficacy of the Novel Diarylquinoline TBAJ-587 and Bedaquiline against a Resistant <i>Rv0678</i> Mutant in a Mouse Model of Tuberculosis.

Xu Jian J Converse Paul J PJ Upton Anna M AM Mdluli Khisimuzi K Fotouhi Nader N Nuermberger Eric L EL

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 20210318 4

Since its conditional approval in 2012, bedaquiline (BDQ) has been a valuable tool for treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. More recently, a novel short-course regimen combining BDQ with pretomanid and linezolid won approval to treat highly drug-resistant tuberculosis. Clinical reports of emerging BDQ resistance have identified mutations in <i>Rv0678</i> that derepress the expression of the MmpL5/MmpS5 efflux transporter as the most common cause. Because the effect of these mutations on bac ...[more]

PMID: 33526488

Similar Datasets

Project description:Drug-resistant tuberculosis is a serious global health threat. Bedaquiline (BDQ) is a relatively new core drug, targeting the respiratory chain in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). While mutations in the BDQ target gene, atpE, are rare in clinical isolates, mutations in the Rv0678 gene, a transcriptional repressor regulating the efflux pump MmpS5-MmpL5, are increasingly observed, and have been linked to worse treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, underlying mechanisms of (cross)-resistance remain incompletely resolved. Our study aims to distinguish resistance associated variants from other polymorphisms, by assessing the in vitro onset of mutations under drug pressure, combined with their impact on minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and on protein stability. For this purpose, isolates were exposed in vitro to sub-lethal concentrations of BDQ or clofazimine (CFZ). Selected colonies had BDQ- and CFZ-MICs determined on 7H10 and 7H11 agar. Sanger sequencing and additional Deeplex Myc-TB and whole genome sequencing (WGS) for a subset of isolates were used to search for mutations in Rv0678, atpE and pepQ. In silico characterization of relevant mutations was performed using computational tools. We found that colonies that grew on BDQ medium had mutations in Rv0678, atpE or pepQ, while CFZ-exposed isolates presented mutations in Rv0678 and pepQ, but none in atpE. Twenty-eight Rv0678 mutations had previously been described among in vitro selected mutants or in patients' isolates, while 85 were new. Mutations were scattered across the Rv0678 gene without apparent hotspot. While most Rv0678 mutations led to an increased BDQ- and/or CFZ-MIC, only a part of them surpassed the critical concentration (69.1% for BDQ and 87.9% for CFZ). Among the mutations leading to elevated MICs for BDQ and CFZ, we report a synonymous Val1Val mutation in the Rv0678 start codon. Finally, in silico characterization of Rv0678 mutations suggests that especially the C46R mutant may render Rv0678 less stable.

Project description:BackgroundThe bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid regimen has been reported to have 90% efficacy against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis, but the incidence of adverse events with 1200 mg of linezolid daily has been high. The appropriate dose of linezolid and duration of treatment with this agent to minimize toxic effects while maintaining efficacy against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis are unclear.MethodsWe enrolled participants with extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin, a fluoroquinolone, and an aminoglycoside), pre-XDR tuberculosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin and to either a fluoroquinolone or an aminoglycoside), or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis that was not responsive to treatment or for which a second-line regimen had been discontinued because of side effects. We randomly assigned the participants to receive bedaquiline for 26 weeks (200 mg daily for 8 weeks, then 100 mg daily for 18 weeks), pretomanid (200 mg daily for 26 weeks), and daily linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks or 600 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks. The primary end point in the modified intention-to-treat population was the incidence of an unfavorable outcome, defined as treatment failure or disease relapse (clinical or bacteriologic) at 26 weeks after completion of treatment. Safety was also evaluated.ResultsA total of 181 participants were enrolled, 88% of whom had XDR or pre-XDR tuberculosis. Among participants who received bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid with linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks or 600 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks, 93%, 89%, 91%, and 84%, respectively, had a favorable outcome; peripheral neuropathy occurred in 38%, 24%, 24%, and 13%, respectively; myelosuppression occurred in 22%, 15%, 2%, and 7%, respectively; and the linezolid dose was modified (i.e., interrupted, reduced, or discontinued) in 51%, 30%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. Optic neuropathy developed in 4 participants (9%) who had received linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks; all the cases resolved. Six of the seven unfavorable microbiologic outcomes through 78 weeks of follow-up occurred in participants assigned to the 9-week linezolid groups.ConclusionsA total of 84 to 93% of the participants across all four bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid treatment groups had a favorable outcome. The overall risk-benefit ratio favored the group that received the three-drug regimen with linezolid at a dose of 600 mg for 26 weeks, with a lower incidence of adverse events reported and fewer linezolid dose modifications. (Funded by the TB Alliance and others; ZeNix ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03086486.).

Dataset Information

Comparative Efficacy of the Novel Diarylquinoline TBAJ-587 and Bedaquiline against a Resistant Rv0678 Mutant in a Mouse Model of Tuberculosis.

Publications

Comparative Efficacy of the Novel Diarylquinoline TBAJ-587 and Bedaquiline against a Resistant <i>Rv0678</i> Mutant in a Mouse Model of Tuberculosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets