Dataset Information

Self-reported surgeon health behaviours: A multicentre, cross-sectional exploration into the modifiable factors that impact surgical performance with the association of surgeons in training.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Surgeons regularly educate patients on health promoting behaviours including diet, sleep and exercise. No study thus far has explored surgeons' personal compliance with these health behaviours and their relationship with surgical performance. The primary outcomes of this study were self-reported health, health related behaviours, wellbeing, fatigue and surgical performance.

Methods

A survey of validated themes on health related behaviours, workplace variables and performance was distributed to surgical trainees and consultants in the UK and Ireland through the Association for Surgeons in Training (ASiT). Non-parametric analysis was used to determine inferential associations.

Results

Ninety five surgeons (51.5% female, 39.9% registrars) completed the survey. 94% and 74% reported 'good' or better overall health and mental wellbeing respectively. The majority (54.7%) reported inconsistent sleep patterns. Less than a quarter engage in regular exercise. Sixty two and 64.2% reported being regularly fatigued and bothered by feelings of anxiety and/or depression respectively. Poor self-reported health and wellbeing were associated with poorer reported off-call performance (p < .01). Higher levels of fatigue negatively impacted self-reported surgical and non-surgical task proficiency (p < .01).

Discussion and conclusion

Surgeons reported high levels of overall health. However, healthy behaviours around sleep, diet and exercise were not consistently reported. Fewer reported good mental health and emotional well-being. Self-reported health behaviours including sleep and physical activity were associated with surgical performance. Strategies to improve modifiable lifestyle factors which will optimise physical health, mental wellbeing and levels of fatigue may optimise surgical performance.

SUBMITTER: Whelehan DF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8111267 | biostudies-literature | 2021 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Self-reported surgeon health behaviours: A multicentre, cross-sectional exploration into the modifiable factors that impact surgical performance with the association of surgeons in training.

Whelehan Dale F DF Connelly Tara M TM Burke Joshua R JR Doherty Eva M EM Ridgway Paul F PF

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) 20210427

<h4>Introduction</h4>Surgeons regularly educate patients on health promoting behaviours including diet, sleep and exercise. No study thus far has explored surgeons' personal compliance with these health behaviours and their relationship with surgical performance. The primary outcomes of this study were self-reported health, health related behaviours, wellbeing, fatigue and surgical performance.<h4>Methods</h4>A survey of validated themes on health related behaviours, workplace variables and perf ...[more]

PMID: 34007440

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundGiven the complexity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and increasing prevalence, there is a need for comprehensive, large-scale studies that investigate potential correlations between surgeon-specific factors and postoperative outcomes after ARCR. This study examines how surgeon-specific factors including case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice impact two-year reoperation rates, conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic or reverse), and 90-day post-ARCR hospitalization.MethodsThe PearlDiver Mariner database was used to collect surgeon-specific variables and query patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018. Patient outcomes were tracked for two years, including reoperations, hospitalizations, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for revision rotator cuff repair (RCR) laterality. Hospitalizations were defined as any emergency department (ED) visit or hospital readmission within 90 days after primary ARCR. Surgeon-specific factors including surgeon case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice were analyzed in relation to postoperative outcomes using both univariate and multivariate logistic regression.Results94,150 patients underwent ARCR by 1489 surgeons. On multivariate analysis, high-volume surgeons demonstrated a higher risk for two-year total reoperation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.12, P = .03) and revision RCR (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P = .02) compared to low-volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons showed higher rates of 90-day ED visits (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.83, P < .001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68-0.78, P < .001) and hospital readmission (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.87, P < .001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88, P = .006) compared to mid- and late-career surgeons. Sports medicine and/or shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained surgeons demonstrated lower two-year reoperation risk (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.91-0.99, P = .04) and fewer 90-day ED visits (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88-0.98, P = .002). Academic surgeons experienced higher readmission rates compared to community surgeons (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01-1.34, P = .03). Surgeons practicing in the Northeast demonstrated lower two-year reoperation (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93, P < .001) and revision (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.94, P < .001) RCR risk compared to surgeons in the Southern United States.ConclusionHigh-volume surgeons exhibit higher two-year reoperation rates after ARCR compared to low-volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons demonstrate increased hospitalizations. Sports medicine or shoulder and elbow surgery fellowships correlate with reduced two-year reoperation rates and 90-day ED visits.

Project description:Importance:Important metrics of residency program success include the clinical outcomes achieved by trainees after transitioning to practice. Previous studies have shown significant differences in reported training experiences of general surgery residents at nonuniversity-based residency (NUBR) and university-based residency (UBR) programs. Objective:To examine the differences in practice patterns and clinical outcomes between surgeons trained in NUBR and those trained in UBR programs. Design, Setting, and Participants:This observational cohort study linked the claims data of patients who underwent general surgery procedures in New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013, to demographic and training information of surgeons in the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile. Patients who underwent a qualifying procedure were grouped by surgeon. Practice pattern analysis was performed on 3638 surgeons and 1 237 621 patients, representing 214 residency programs. Clinical outcomes analysis was performed on 2301 surgeons and 312 584 patients. Data analysis was conducted from February 1, 2017, to July 31, 2017. Exposures:NUBR or UBR training status. Main Outcomes and Measures:Inpatient mortality, complications, and prolonged length of stay. Results:No significant differences were observed between the NUBR-trained surgeons and UBR-trained surgeons in age (mean, 53.3 years vs 53.7 years), sex (female, 18.2% vs 16.9%), or years of clinical experience (mean, 16.5 years vs 16.5 years). Overall, NUBR-trained surgeons compared with UBR-trained surgeons performed more procedures (median interquartile range [IQR], 328 [93-661] vs 164 [49-444]; P < .001) and performed a greater proportion of procedures in the outpatient setting (risk difference, 6.5; 95% CI, 6.4 to 6.7; P < .001). Before matching, the mean proportion of patients with documented inpatient mortality was lower for NUBR-trained surgeons than for UBR-trained surgeons (risk difference, -1.01; 95% CI, -1.41 to -0.61; P < .001). The mean proportion of patients with complications (risk difference, -3.17%; 95% CI, -4.21 to -2.13; P < .001) and prolonged length of stay (risk difference, -1.89%; 95% CI, -2.79 to -0.98; P < .001) was also lower for NUBR-trained surgeons. After matching, no significant differences in patient mortality, complications, and prolonged length of stay were found between NUBR- and UBR-trained surgeons. Conclusions and Relevance:Surgeons trained in NUBR and UBR programs have distinct practice patterns. After controlling for patient, procedure, and hospital factors, no differences were observed in the inpatient outcomes between the 2 groups.

Dataset Information

Self-reported surgeon health behaviours: A multicentre, cross-sectional exploration into the modifiable factors that impact surgical performance with the association of surgeons in training.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion and conclusion

Publications

Self-reported surgeon health behaviours: A multicentre, cross-sectional exploration into the modifiable factors that impact surgical performance with the association of surgeons in training.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets