Dataset Information

Validation testing to determine the sensitivity of lateral flow testing for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 detection in low prevalence settings: Testing frequency and public health messaging is key.

ABSTRACT: Lateral flow devices (LFDs) are quickly being implemented for use in large-scale population surveillance programs for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United Kingdom. These programs have been piloted in city-wide screening in the city of Liverpool and are now being rolled out to support care home visits and the return home of University students for the Christmas break. Here, we present data on the performance of LFDs to test almost 8,000 students at the University of Birmingham between December 2 and December 9, 2020. The performance is validated against almost 800 samples using PCR performed in the University Pillar 2 testing lab and theoretically validated on thousands of Pillar 2 PCR testing results performed on low-prevalence care home testing samples. Our data show that LFDs do not detect infections presenting with PCR Ct values over 29 to 30 as determined using the Thermo Fisher TaqPath asssay. This may be of particular importance in detecting individuals that are either at the early, or late stages of infection, and reinforces the need for frequent, recurrent testing.

SUBMITTER: Ferguson J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8112643 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Validation testing to determine the sensitivity of lateral flow testing for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 detection in low prevalence settings: Testing frequency and public health messaging is key.

Ferguson Jack J Dunn Steven S Best Angus A Mirza Jeremy J Percival Benita B Mayhew Megan M Megram Oliver O Ashford Fiona F White Thomas T Moles-Garcia Emma E Crawford Liam L Plant Tim T Bosworth Andrew A Kidd Michael M Richter Alex A Deeks Jonathan J McNally Alan A

PLoS biology 20210429 4

Lateral flow devices (LFDs) are quickly being implemented for use in large-scale population surveillance programs for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the United Kingdom. These programs have been piloted in city-wide screening in the city of Liverpool and are now being rolled out to support care home visits and the return home of University students for the Christmas break. Here, we present data on the performance of LFDs to test almost 8,000 students at the University of Birmingham between December 2 an ...[more]

PMID: 33914730

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the performance of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid lateral flow test (LFT) versus polymerase chain reaction testing in the asymptomatic general population attending testing centres.DesignObservational cohort study.SettingCommunity LFT pilot at covid-19 testing sites in Liverpool, UK.Participants5869 asymptomatic adults (≥18 years) voluntarily attending one of 48 testing sites during 6-29 November 2020.InterventionsParticipants were tested using both an Innova LFT and a quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test based on supervised self-administered swabbing at testing sites.Main outcome measuresSensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of LFT compared with RT-qPCR in an epidemic steady state of covid-19 among adults with no classic symptoms of the disease.ResultsOf 5869 test results, 22 (0.4%) LFT results and 343 (5.8%) RT-qPCR results were void (that is, when the control line fails to appear within 30 minutes). Excluding the void results, the LFT versus RT-qPCR showed a sensitivity of 40.0% (95% confidence interval 28.5% to 52.4%; 28/70), specificity of 99.9% (99.8% to 99.99%; 5431/5434), positive predictive value of 90.3% (74.2% to 98.0%; 28/31), and negative predictive value of 99.2% (99.0% to 99.4%; 5431/5473). When the void samples were assumed to be negative, a sensitivity was observed for LFT of 37.8% (26.8% to 49.9%; 28/74), specificity of 99.6% (99.4% to 99.8%; 5431/5452), positive predictive value of 84.8% (68.1% to 94.9%; 28/33), and negative predictive value of 93.4% (92.7% to 94.0%; 5431/5814). The sensitivity in participants with an RT-qPCR cycle threshold (Ct) of <18.3 (approximate viral loads >106 RNA copies/mL) was 90.9% (58.7% to 99.8%; 10/11), a Ct of <24.4 (>104 RNA copies/mL) was 69.4% (51.9% to 83.7%; 25/36), and a Ct of >24.4 (<104 RNA copies/mL) was 9.7% (1.9% to 23.7%; 3/34). LFT is likely to detect at least three fifths and at most 998 in every 1000 people with a positive RT-qPCR test result with high viral load.ConclusionsThe Innova LFT can be useful for identifying infections among adults who report no symptoms of covid-19, particularly those with high viral load who are more likely to infect others. The number of asymptomatic adults with lower Ct (indicating higher viral load) missed by LFT, although small, should be considered when using single LFT in high consequence settings. Clear and accurate communication with the public about how to interpret test results is important, given the chance of missing some cases, even at high viral loads. Further research is needed to understand how infectiousness is reflected in the viral antigen shedding detected by LFT versus the viral loads approximated by RT-qPCR.

Project description:Point-of-care diagnostics often use isothermal nucleic acid amplification for qualitative detection of pathogens in low-resource healthcare settings but lack sufficient precision for quantitative applications such as HIV viral load monitoring. Although viral load (VL) monitoring is an essential component of HIV treatment, commercially available tests rely on relatively high-resource chemistries like real-time polymerase chain reaction and are thus used on an infrequent basis for millions of people living with HIV in low-income countries. To address the constraints of low-resource settings on nucleic acid quantification, we describe a recombinase polymerase amplification and lateral flow detection approach that quantifies HIV-1 DNA or RNA by comparison to a competitive internal amplification control (IAC) of a known copy number, which may be set to any useful threshold (in our case, a clinically relevant threshold for HIV treatment failure). The IAC is designed to amplify alongside the HIV target with a similar efficiency, allowing for normalization of the assay to variation or inhibition and enabling an endpoint readout that is compatible with commercially available kits for nucleic acid lateral flow detection and interpretable with minimal instrumentation or by the naked eye. We find that this approach can reliably differentiate ≤600 or ≥1400 copies of HIV DNA from a 1000-copy threshold when lateral flow strips are imaged with a conventional office scanner and analyzed with free densitometry software. We further demonstrate a user-friendly adaptation of this analysis to process cell phone photographs with an automated script. Alternatively, we show via a survey that 21 minimally trained volunteers could reliably resolve ≥10-fold (log10) differences of HIV DNA or RNA by naked eye interpretation of lateral flow results. This amplification and detection workflow requires minimal instrumentation, takes just 30 min to complete, and when combined with a suitable sample preparation method, may enable HIV VL testing while the patient waits or a self-test, which has the potential to improve care. This approach may be adapted for other applications that require quantitative analysis of a nucleic acid target in low-resource settings.

Dataset Information

Validation testing to determine the sensitivity of lateral flow testing for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 detection in low prevalence settings: Testing frequency and public health messaging is key.

Publications

Validation testing to determine the sensitivity of lateral flow testing for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 detection in low prevalence settings: Testing frequency and public health messaging is key.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets