Dataset Information

Associations between DNA Damage and PD-L1 Expression in Ovarian Cancer, a Potential Biomarker for Clinical Response.

ABSTRACT: Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are currently under investigation as a potential treatment option for ovarian cancer. Although this therapy has shown promise, its efficacy is highly variable among patients. Evidence suggests that genomic instability influences the expression of PD-L1, but little is known about this relationship in ovarian cancer. To examine the relationship between PD-L1 expression and genomic instability, we measured DNA damage using Repair Assisted Damage Detection (RADD). We then correlated the presence of persistent DNA damage in the ovarian tumor with protein expression of PD-L1 using immunohistochemistry. Ovarian tumors showed a high prevalence of oxidative DNA damage. As the level of oxidative DNA damage increased, we saw a significant correlation with PD-L1 expression. The highest correlation between DNA damage and PD-L1 expression was observed for mucinous ovarian tumors (r = 0.82), but a strong correlation was also observed for high grade serous and endometrioid tumors (r = 0.67 and 0.69, respectively). These findings link genomic instability to PD-L1 protein expression in ovarian cancer and suggest that persistent DNA damage can be used as a potential biomarker for patient selection for immunotherapy treatment.

SUBMITTER: Mann EK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8146974 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Associations between DNA Damage and PD-L1 Expression in Ovarian Cancer, a Potential Biomarker for Clinical Response.

Mann Elise K EK Lee Kevin J KJ Chen Dongquan D da Silva Luciana Madeira LM Dal Zotto Valeria L VL Scalici Jennifer J Gassman Natalie R NR

Biology 20210429 5

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are currently under investigation as a potential treatment option for ovarian cancer. Although this therapy has shown promise, its efficacy is highly variable among patients. Evidence suggests that genomic instability influences the expression of PD-L1, but little is known about this relationship in ovarian cancer. To examine the relationship between PD-L1 expression and genomic instability, we measured DNA damage using Repair Assisted Damage Detectio ...[more]

PMID: 33946684

Similar Datasets

Project description:PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors show potential for cervical cancer treatment. However, low response rates suggest that patient selection based on PD-L1 protein expression is not optimal. Here, we evaluated different PD-L1 detection methods and studied transcriptional regulation of PD-L1/PD-L2 expression by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) mRNAseq analysis. First, we determined the copy number of the PD-L1/PD-L2 locus by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), PD-L1 mRNA expression by RNA in situ hybridization (RNAish), and PD-L1/PD-L2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays containing a cohort of 60 patients. Additionally, distribution of PD-L1/PD-L2 was visualized based on flow cytometry analysis of single-cell suspensions (n = 10). PD-L1/PD-L2 locus amplification was rare (2%). PD-L1 mRNA expression in tumor cells was detected in 56% of cases, while 41% expressed PD-L1 protein. Discordant scores for PD-L1 protein expression on tumor cells between cores from one patient were observed in 27% of cases. Interestingly, with RNAish, PD-L1 heterogeneity was observed in only 11% of the cases. PD-L2 protein expression was found in 53%. PD-L1 mRNA and protein expression on tumor cells were strongly correlated (p < 0.001). PD-L1 and PD-L2 protein expression showed no correlation on tumor cells (p = 0.837), but a strong correlation on cells in stromal fields (p < 0.001). Co-expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 on macrophage-like populations was also observed with flow cytometry analysis. Both PD-L1 and PD-L2 TCGA transcript levels strongly correlated in the TCGA data, and both PD-L1 and PD-L2 strongly correlated with interferon gamma (IFNG) expression/transcript levels (p < 0.0001). Importantly, patients with high PD-L1/PD-L2/IFNG transcript levels had a survival advantage over patients with high PD-L1/PD-L2 and low IFNG expression. Based on these findings, we conclude that PD-L1/PD-L2 expression in cervical cancer is mainly associated with interferon induction and not gene amplification, which makes FISH unsuitable as biomarker. The heterogeneous PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression patterns suggest IHC unreliable for patient selection. RNAish, in conjunction with interferon signaling evaluation, seems a promising technique for immune checkpoint detection. These results warrant further investigation into their prognostic and predictive potential.

Project description:Immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) has considerably improved the prognosis of patients with advanced cancers; however, its efficacy in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unfavourable. To address the issue of PDAC immunotherapy, we investigated the expression of two PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, in PDAC, analysed their role in survival, and explored their correlation with clinicopathological features, immune infiltration, and DNA damage response molecules. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 291 surgically resected PDAC samples. In tumour cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs), the positivity of PD-L1 expression was 30 and 20% and that of PD-L2 expression was 40 and 20%, respectively. Moreover, PD-L1 expression on TCs correlated with its expression on ICs (p < 0.0001); a similar result was observed for PD-L2 (p < 0.0001). Nonetheless, no correlation was observed between PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression. Positive PD-L1 expression on TCs was related to N1 stage (p = 0.011) and AJCC II stage (p = 0.002), whereas positive PD-L2 expression on TCs was associated with high FOXP3+ cell infiltration (p = 0.001) and high BRCA2 expression (p < 0.0001). Survival analysis revealed that positive PD-L1 (p = 0.046) and PD-L2 (p = 0.028) expression on TCs was an independent risk factor for unfavourable disease-specific survival (DSS). Furthermore, positive PD-L2 expression on TCs was an independent risk factor for lower DSS in the pN0 (p = 0.023), moderate and well tumour differentiation (p = 0.004), low BRCA1 (p = 0.017), wild-type p53 (p = 0.034), and proficient mismatch repair (p = 0.004) subgroups. Moreover, post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy could significantly affect DSS, regardless of PD-L1/PD-L2 expression status (positive or negative) on TCs, while it only prolonged DSS in PDL1-ICs(-) (p < 0.0001) and PDL2-ICs(-) (p < 0.0001) subgroups. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of the roles of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in PDAC, supporting anti-PD-1 axis immunotherapy for PDAC.

Dataset Information

Associations between DNA Damage and PD-L1 Expression in Ovarian Cancer, a Potential Biomarker for Clinical Response.

Publications

Associations between DNA Damage and PD-L1 Expression in Ovarian Cancer, a Potential Biomarker for Clinical Response.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets