Dataset Information

Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness?

ABSTRACT: The interpretation of the Maintenance Wakefulness Test (MWT) relies on sleep onset detection. However, microsleeps (MSs), i.e., brief periods of sleep intrusion during wakefulness, may occur before sleep onset. We assessed the prevalence of MSs during the MWT and their contribution to the diagnosis of residual sleepiness in patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or hypersomnia. The MWT of 98 patients (89 OSA, 82.6% male) were analyzed for MS scoring. Polysomnography parameters and clinical data were collected. The diagnostic value for detecting sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale > 10) of sleep onset latency (SOL) and of the first MS latency (MSL) was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC, 95% CI). At least one MS was observed in 62.2% of patients. MSL was positively correlated with SOL (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) but not with subjective scales, clinical variables, or polysomnography parameters. The use of SOL or MSL did not influence the diagnostic performance of the MWT for subjective sleepiness assessment (AUC = 0.66 95% CI (0.56, 0.77) versus 0.63 95% CI (0.51, 0.74)). MSs are frequent during MWTs performed in patients treated for sleep disorders, even in the absence of subjective sleepiness, and may represent physiological markers of the wake-to-sleep transition.

SUBMITTER: Des Champs de Boishebert L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8161762 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness?

Des Champs de Boishebert Ludivine L Pradat Pierre P Bastuji Hélène H Ricordeau François F Gormand Frédéric F Le Cam Pierre P Stauffer Emeric E Petitjean Thierry T Peter-Derex Laure L

Clocks & sleep 20210430 2

The interpretation of the Maintenance Wakefulness Test (MWT) relies on sleep onset detection. However, microsleeps (MSs), i.e., brief periods of sleep intrusion during wakefulness, may occur before sleep onset. We assessed the prevalence of MSs during the MWT and their contribution to the diagnosis of residual sleepiness in patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or hypersomnia. The MWT of 98 patients (89 OSA, 82.6% male) were analyzed for MS scoring. Polysomnography parameters and cl ...[more]

PMID: 33946265

Similar Datasets

Project description:Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) exhibit heterogeneous heart rate variability (HRV) during wakefulness and sleep. We investigated the influence of OSA severity on HRV parameters during wakefulness in a large international clinical sample. 1247 subjects (426 without OSA and 821 patients with OSA) were enrolled from the Sleep Apnea Global Interdisciplinary Consortium. HRV parameters were calculated during a 5-minute wakefulness period with spontaneous breathing prior to the sleep study, using time-domain, frequency-domain and nonlinear methods. Differences in HRV were evaluated among groups using analysis of covariance, controlling for relevant covariates. Patients with OSA showed significantly lower time-domain variations and less complexity of heartbeats compared to individuals without OSA. Those with severe OSA had remarkably reduced HRV compared to all other groups. Compared to non-OSA patients, those with severe OSA had lower HRV based on SDNN (adjusted mean: 37.4 vs. 46.2 ms; p < 0.0001), RMSSD (21.5 vs. 27.9 ms; p < 0.0001), ShanEn (1.83 vs. 2.01; p < 0.0001), and Forbword (36.7 vs. 33.0; p = 0.0001). While no differences were found in frequency-domain measures overall, among obese patients there was a shift to sympathetic dominance in severe OSA, with a higher LF/HF ratio compared to obese non-OSA patients (4.2 vs. 2.7; p = 0.009). Time-domain and nonlinear HRV measures during wakefulness are associated with OSA severity, with severe patients having remarkably reduced and less complex HRV. Frequency-domain measures show a shift to sympathetic dominance only in obese OSA patients. Thus, HRV during wakefulness could provide additional information about cardiovascular physiology in OSA patients. A Prospective Observational Cohort to Study the Genetics of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Associated Co-Morbidities (German Clinical Trials Register - DKRS, DRKS00003966) https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00003966.

Project description:Study objectivesPatients presenting with excessive sleepiness are frequently using antidepressant medication(s). While practice parameters recommend discontinuation of antidepressants prior to multiple sleep latency testing (MSLT), data examining the impact of tapering these medications on MSLT results are limited.MethodsAdult patients who underwent MSLT at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, between 2014 and 2018 were included. Clinical and demographic characteristics, medications, including use of rapid eye movement-suppressing antidepressants (REMS-ADs) at assessment and during testing, actigraphy, and polysomnography data were manually abstracted. The difference in number of sleep-onset rapid eye movement periods (SOREMs), proportion with ≥2 SOREMs, and mean sleep latency in patients who were using REMS-ADs and discontinued prior to testing versus those who remained on REMS-ADs were examined. At our center, all antidepressants are discontinued 2 weeks prior to MSLT, wherever feasible; fluoxetine is stopped 6 weeks prior. Regression analyses accounting for demographic, clinical, and other medication-related confounders were performed.ResultsA total of 502 patients (age = 38.18 ± 15.90 years; 67% female) underwent MSLT; 178 (35%) were taking REMS-ADs at the time of assessment. REMS-AD was discontinued prior to MSLT in 121/178 (70%) patients. Patients whose REMS-AD was discontinued prior to MSLT were more likely to have ≥2 SOREMs (odds ratio: 12.20; 95% confidence interval: 1.60-92.94) compared with patients on REMS-ADs at MSLT. They also had shorter mean sleep latency (8.77 ± 0.46 vs 10.21 ± 0.28 minutes; P > .009) and higher odds of having ≥2 SOREMs (odds ratio: 2.22; 95% confidence interval: 1.23-3.98) compared with patients not taking REMS-ADs at initial assessment. These differences persisted after regression analyses accounting for confounders.ConclusionsPatients who taper off REMS-ADs prior to MSLT are more likely to demonstrate ≥2 SOREMs and have a shorter mean sleep latency. Pending further prospective investigations, clinicians should preferably withdraw REMS-ADs before MSLT. If this is not done, the test interpretation should include a statement regarding the potential effect of the drugs on the results.

Dataset Information

Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness?

Publications

Microsleep versus Sleep Onset Latency during Maintenance Wakefulness Tests: Which One Is the Best Marker of Sleepiness?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets