Dataset Information

Accurate single-cell genotyping utilizing information from the local genome territory.

ABSTRACT: Single-nucleotide variant (SNV) detection in the genome of single cells is affected by DNA amplification artefacts, including imbalanced alleles and early PCR errors. Existing single-cell genotyper accuracy often depends on the quality and coordination of both the target single-cell and external data, such as heterozygous profiles determined by bulk data. In most single-cell studies, information from different sources is not perfectly matched. High-accuracy SNV detection with a limited single data source remains a challenge. We developed a new variant detection method, SCOUT (Single Cell Genotyper Utilizing Information from Local Genome Territory), the greatest advantage of which is not requiring external data while base calling. By leveraging base count information from the adjacent genomic region, SCOUT classifies all candidate SNVs into homozygous, heterozygous, intermediate and low major allele SNVs according to the highest likelihood score. Compared with other genotypers, SCOUT improves the variant detection performance by 2.0-77.5% in real and simulated single-cell datasets. Furthermore, the running time of SCOUT increases linearly with sequence length; as a result, it shows 400% average acceleration in operating efficiency compared with other methods.

SUBMITTER: Tu K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8191788 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Accurate single-cell genotyping utilizing information from the local genome territory.

Tu Kailing K Lu Keying K Zhang Qilin Q Huang Wei W Xie Dan D Xie Dan D

Nucleic acids research 20210601 10

Single-nucleotide variant (SNV) detection in the genome of single cells is affected by DNA amplification artefacts, including imbalanced alleles and early PCR errors. Existing single-cell genotyper accuracy often depends on the quality and coordination of both the target single-cell and external data, such as heterozygous profiles determined by bulk data. In most single-cell studies, information from different sources is not perfectly matched. High-accuracy SNV detection with a limited single da ...[more]

PMID: 33619552

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundGenotyping of sequence variants typically involves, as a first step, the alignment of sequencing reads to a linear reference genome. Because a linear reference genome represents only a small fraction of all the DNA sequence variation within a species, reference allele bias may occur at highly polymorphic or divergent regions of the genome. Graph-based methods facilitate the comparison of sequencing reads to a variation-aware genome graph, which incorporates a collection of non-redundant DNA sequences that segregate within a species. We compared the accuracy and sensitivity of graph-based sequence variant genotyping using the Graphtyper software to two widely-used methods, i.e., GATK and SAMtools, which rely on linear reference genomes using whole-genome sequencing data from 49 Original Braunvieh cattle.ResultsWe discovered 21,140,196, 20,262,913, and 20,668,459 polymorphic sites using GATK, Graphtyper, and SAMtools, respectively. Comparisons between sequence variant genotypes and microarray-derived genotypes showed that Graphtyper outperformed both GATK and SAMtools in terms of genotype concordance, non-reference sensitivity, and non-reference discrepancy. The sequence variant genotypes that were obtained using Graphtyper had the smallest number of Mendelian inconsistencies between sequence-derived single nucleotide polymorphisms and indels in nine sire-son pairs. Genotype phasing and imputation using the Beagle software improved the quality of the sequence variant genotypes for all the tools evaluated, particularly for animals that were sequenced at low coverage. Following imputation, the concordance between sequence- and microarray-derived genotypes was almost identical for the three methods evaluated, i.e., 99.32, 99.46, and 99.24% for GATK, Graphtyper, and SAMtools, respectively. Variant filtration based on commonly used criteria improved genotype concordance slightly but it also decreased sensitivity. Graphtyper required considerably more computing resources than SAMtools but less than GATK.ConclusionsSequence variant genotyping using Graphtyper is accurate, sensitive and computationally feasible in cattle. Graph-based methods enable sequence variant genotyping from variation-aware reference genomes that may incorporate cohort-specific sequence variants, which is not possible with the current implementation of state-of-the-art methods that rely on linear reference genomes.

Dataset Information

Accurate single-cell genotyping utilizing information from the local genome territory.

Publications

Accurate single-cell genotyping utilizing information from the local genome territory.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets