Canadian Urological Association guideline on androgen deprivation therapy: Adverse events and management strategies.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Kokorovic A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8195588 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Canadian Urological Association guideline on androgen deprivation therapy: Adverse events and management strategies.
Kokorovic Andrea A So Alan I AI Serag Hosam H French Christopher C Hamilton Robert J RJ Izard Jason P JP Nayak Jasmir G JG Pouliot Fréderic F Saad Fred F Shayegan Bobby B Aprikian Armen A Rendon Ricardo A RA
Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada 20210601 6
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9343157 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10426420 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6456347 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9245964 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Erectile dysfunction (ED) impacts the wellness and quality of life of millions of Canadians. An evaluation focused on the identification of reversible and irreversible underlying factors is recommended for patients presenting with ED. Through a shared decision-making model framework, the goal of ED treatment is to improve functional outcomes and enhance sexual satisfaction while minimizing adverse effects associated with treatment. Given that ED is assessed and treated by multiple different types of health practitioners, the purpose of this guideline is to provide the best available evidence to facilitate care delivery through a Canadian lens. After a narrative review of ED assessment and treatment for general readership, five key clinical questions relating to priority areas of ED are assessed using the GRADE and evidence-to-decision-making frameworks.
| S-EPMC8525522 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe association between patient demographics and CV events after ADT using real-world data was evaluated. In addition to encompassing >30 times more patients than all previous MACE studies, this is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, to include a comprehensive listing of many demographic factors from one large, recent US dataset over a long period of time.Materials and methodsThe retrospective analysis of data in the Decision Resources Group (now Clarivate) Real World Evidence repository, representing >300M US patients from 1991 to 2020 across all US regions, was performed. Patients with PCa receiving ≥1 ADT injection were included. MACE risk after ADT initiation was evaluated for demographic and potential PCa-related risk factors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed, and Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between MACE risk and demographic/PCa-related risk factors.ResultsOverall, MACE risk was slightly lower in the first year after ADT initiation (3.9%) vs. years 2-4 (∼5.2%). In a multivariate Cox model, MACE risk after ADT initiation was significantly higher for older vs. younger patients (adjusted HR per increasing year = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07-1.09), men with a history of MACE vs. without (HR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.72-2.88), men with very low BMI vs. normal or high BMI (HR for decreasing BMI per kg/m2 = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03), White vs. Black patients (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.08-1.55), and patients who did not use statins vs. those who did (HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00-1.27). Of the PCa-related risk factors, MACE risk after ADT initiation was significantly higher for oncology vs. urology treatment setting (HR = 2.47, 95% CI: 2.12-2.88), patients with baseline metastasis vs. those without (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.72-3.07), and patients treated with antagonists vs. agonists (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.25-2.10).ConclusionsDemographic factors are important contributors to increased MACE risk for men with PCa on ADT. Clinicians should monitor risk factors and modify if possible.
| S-EPMC11452244 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Urethral stricture is fundamentally a fibrosis of the urethral epithelial and associated corpus spongiosum, which in turn, causes obstruction of the urethral lumen. Patients with urethral stricture most commonly present with lower urinary tract symptoms, urinary retention or urinary tract infection but may also experience a broad spectrum of other signs and symptoms, including genitourinary pain, hematuria, abscess, ejaculatory dysfunction, or renal failure. When urethral stricture is initially suspected based on clinical assessment, cystoscopy is suggested as the modality that most accurately establishes the diagnosis. This recommendation is based on several factors, including the accuracy of cystoscopy, as well as its wide availability, lesser overall cost, and comfort of urologists with this technique. When recurrent urethral stricture is suspected, we suggest performing retrograde urethrography to further stage the length and location of the stricture or referring the patient to a physician with expertise in reconstructive urology. Ultimately, the treatment decision depends on several factors, including the type and acuity of patient symptoms, the presence of complications, prior interventions, and the overall impact of the urethral stricture on the patient's quality of life. Endoscopic treatment, either as dilation or internal urethrotomy, is suggested rather than urethroplasty for the initial treatment of urethral stricture. This recommendation applies to men with undifferentiated urethral stricture and does not apply to trauma-related urethral injuries, penile urethral strictures (hypospadias, lichen sclerosus), or suspected urethral malignancy. In the setting of recurrent urethral stricture, urethroplasty is suggested rather than repeat endoscopic management but this may vary depending on patient preference and impact of the symptoms on the patient.The purpose of this guideline is to provide a practical summary outlining the diagnosis and treatment of urethral stricture in the Canadian setting.
| S-EPMC7716842 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10581723 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundLimited data are available on adverse events among children admitted to hospital. The Canadian Paediatric Adverse Events Study was done to describe the epidemiology of adverse events among children in hospital in Canada.MethodsWe performed a 2-stage medical record review at 8 academic pediatric centres and 14 community hospitals in Canada. We reviewed charts from patients admitted from April 2008 through March 2009, evenly distributed across 4 age groups (0 to 28 d; 29 to 365 d; > 1 to 5 yr and > 5 to 18 yr). In stage 1, nurses and health records personnel who had received training in the use of the Canadian Paediatric Trigger Tool reviewed medical records to detect triggers for possible adverse events. In stage 2, physicians reviewed the charts identified as having triggers and described the adverse events.ResultsA total of 3669 children were admitted to hospital during the study period. The weighted rate of adverse events was 9.2%. Adverse events were more frequent in academic pediatric centres than in community hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-5.39). The incidence of preventable adverse events was not significantly different between types of hospital, but nonpreventable adverse events were more common in academic pediatric centres (adjusted OR 4.39, 95% CI 2.08-9.27). Surgical events predominated overall and occurred more frequently in academic pediatric centres than in community hospitals (37.2% v. 21.5%, relative risk [RR] 1.7, 95% CI 1.0-3.1), whereas events associated with diagnostic errors were significantly less frequent (11.1% v. 23.1%, RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.9).InterpretationMore children have adverse events in academic pediatric centres than in community hospitals; however, adverse events in the former are less likely to be preventable. There are many opportunities to reduce harm affecting children in hospital in Canada, particularly related to surgery, intensive care and diagnostic error.
| S-EPMC3447037 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is well established as a backbone therapy for metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa), and both European and American guidelines emphasize the importance of maintaining ADT after progression to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, the use of ADT varies widely in clinical practice despite these recommendations. Both research and development of increasingly precise assay technologies have improved our understanding of androgen production and signaling, and the recent data have suggested that a new serum testosterone cutoff value of <0.7 nmol/L should be employed. Most clinical trials to date have used the historical 1.7 nmol/L cutoff, but the <0.7 nmol/L cutoff has been associated with improved patient outcomes. Combining agents with different mechanisms of action to achieve intense androgen blockade may improve survival both before and after progression to CRPC. Data suggest that this intensive approach to androgen deprivation could delay the transition to CPRC and hence improve survival dramatically. Various combinations of backbone ADT with chemotherapy or radiotherapy are under investigation. Administration of ADT is established in patients with intermediate or high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) receiving radiotherapy with curative intent. This article reviews the current and potential role of ADT as backbone therapy in both hormone-sensitive PCa and CRPC with a focus on mPCa.
| S-EPMC5140029 | biostudies-literature