Dataset Information

Comparison of reduced intensity conditioning regimens used in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for myelofibrosis with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) using either Busulfan Fludarabine (BuFlu), Fludarabine Bis-chlorethyl-nitroso-urea/ carmustine Melphalan (FBM) or Fludarabine Melphalan (FluMel) regimens. Sixty-one patients were identified who underwent HCT with one of these RIC regimens. Overall survival (OS) was not different in the 3 groups. However, 100% donor chimerism was seen in more frequently at day +30 and day +100 in patients who received FBM or FluMel than BuFlu, in both CD3 and CD33 fractions. For instance, 100% donor chimerism in CD33 fraction was present in 100% patients in FBM cohort, 90% in FluMel cohort while 44% in BuFlu cohort at day +100. Acute graft-versus host disease, grade 2-4 and grade 3-4, was not statistically different in the 3 groups (BuFlu 47 and 35%, FBM 68 and 27%, FluMel 68 and 46%; p = 0.31 and 0.45). Relapses and non-relapse mortality was also not statistically significantly different. Our study shows similar OS with these 3 RIC regimens in myelofibrosis; although donor chimerism at day +30 and day +100 was better in patients who received FBM and FluMel.

SUBMITTER: Jain T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8201429 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of reduced intensity conditioning regimens used in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis.

Jain Tania T Kunze Katie L KL Temkit M'hamed M Partain Daniel K DK Patnaik Mrinal S MS Slack James L JL Khera Nandita N Hogan William J WJ Roy Vivek V Noel Pierre P Leis Jose F JF Sproat Lisa Z LZ Fauble Veena V Mesa Ruben A RA Palmer Jeanne J

Bone marrow transplantation 20180524 2

The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes of patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT) for myelofibrosis with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) using either Busulfan Fludarabine (BuFlu), Fludarabine Bis-chlorethyl-nitroso-urea/ carmustine Melphalan (FBM) or Fludarabine Melphalan (FluMel) regimens. Sixty-one patients were identified who underwent HCT with one of these RIC regimens. Overall survival (OS) was not different in the 3 groups. However, 100% donor ...[more]

PMID: 29795431

Similar Datasets

Project description:Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are frequently used for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the RIC regimen with the best risk/benefit profile for allo-HCT in DLBCL is not known. This is particularly important because patients with DLBCL undergoing allo-HCT in the future would be enriched for those whose lymphoma has failed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy or other novel immunotherapies, with potentially more advanced disease and suboptimal performance scores. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we report the outcomes of the 3 most commonly used allo-HCT RIC regimens in patients with DLBCL. Our analysis included a total of 562 adult DLBCL patients in the CIBMTR registry undergoing allo-HCT using matched related or unrelated donors, between 2008 and 2016. Patients received 1 of 3 RIC regimens: fludarabine/i.v. busulfan ~6.4 mg/kg (Flu/Bu), fludarabine/melphalan 140 mg/m2 (Flu/Mel140), or BCNU/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan (BEAM). Accordingly, the study group was divided into 3 groups: Flu/Bu (n = 151), Flu/Mel140 (n = 296), and BEAM (n = 115). Relative to Flu/Bu, the Flu/Mel140 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42 to 3.82; P = .001) and BEAM (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.34 to 4.80; P = .004) regimens were associated with a risk of higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Although the risk of relapse with Flu/Mel140 was lower than that with Flu/Bu (HR, .70; 95% CI, .52 to .95; P = .02), this did not translate to improved progression-free survival (HR, 1.04) or overall survival (HR, 1.30). There was a significantly higher risk of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease with BEAM compared with Flu/Bu (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.35; P = .03). In the chemosensitive subset, multivariate analysis showed a significantly higher mortality risk with Flu/Mel140 (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.04; P = .02) relative to Flu/Bu conditioning. In the largest analysis comparing the impact of various RIC regimens on the survival of DLBCL patients undergoing allo-HCT, our results suggest that Flu/Bu is a better RIC choice in less fit or heavily pretreated patients due to lowest NRM risk.

Dataset Information

Comparison of reduced intensity conditioning regimens used in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis.

Publications

Comparison of reduced intensity conditioning regimens used in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets