Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

ABSTRACT:

Background

Qualitative approaches, alone or in mixed methods, are prominent within implementation science. However, traditional qualitative approaches are resource intensive, which has led to the development of rapid qualitative approaches. Published rapid approaches are often inductive in nature and rely on transcripts of interviews. We describe a deductive rapid analysis approach using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) that uses notes and audio recordings. This paper compares our rapid versus traditional deductive CFIR approach.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted for two cohorts of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Diffusion of Excellence (DoE). The CFIR guided data collection and analysis. In cohort A, we used our traditio

SUBMITTER: Nevedal AL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8252308 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature