Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used to evaluate surgical outcome in patients undergoing joint replacement surgery, however routine collection from the target population is often incomplete. Representative samples are required to allow inference from the sample to the population. Although higher capture rates are desired, the extent to which this improves the representativeness of the sample is not known. We aimed to measure the representativeness of data collected using an electronic PROMs capture system with or without telephone call follow up, and any differences in PROMS reporting between electronic and telephone call follow up.Methods
Data from a pilot PROMs program within a large national joint replacement registry were examined. Tele
SUBMITTER: Harris IA
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8253407 | biostudies-literature | 2021
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature