Dataset Information

Successful Surgical Embolectomy for a Rapidly Deteriorating Patient with Pulmonary Embolism and Hemorrhagic Stroke.

ABSTRACT: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition. High-risk PE is defined as pulmonary embolism with either hemodynamic collapse, persistent hypotension, and/or organ hypoperfusion. The overall mortality rate associated with high-risk PE remains at approximately 30%. Intermediate-high risk PE is a new term introduced to identify hemodynamically stable PE patients with evidence of right ventricular dysfunction. Thrombolytics therapy is the first choice for treatment of high-risk PE with hemodynamic instability; however, in a patient who failed thrombolytics or have contraindication to thrombolytics, thrombus removal either with open surgical or catheter embolectomy is a good alternative. We report a case of a patient who presented with hemorrhagic stroke complicated by intermediate-high-risk PE that rapidly deteriorated before undergoing successful surgical embolectomy.

SUBMITTER: Nasri MSMK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8254158 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan-Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Successful Surgical Embolectomy for a Rapidly Deteriorating Patient with Pulmonary Embolism and Hemorrhagic Stroke.

Nasri Mohamad Salim Mohamad Kousay MSMK Abdelghani Mohamed Salah MS Carr Cornelia S CS Wani Mohd Lateef ML Al-Hijji Mohammed M

Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association 20210101 1

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition. High-risk PE is defined as pulmonary embolism with either hemodynamic collapse, persistent hypotension, and/or organ hypoperfusion. The overall mortality rate associated with high-risk PE remains at approximately 30%. Intermediate-high risk PE is a new term introduced to identify hemodynamically stable PE patients with evidence of right ventricular dysfunction. Thrombolytics therapy is the first choice for treatment of high-risk PE with he ...[more]

PMID: 34276888

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSystemic thrombolysis (ST) and catheter-directed intervention (CDI) are both used in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE), but the comparative outcomes of these two therapies remain unclear. The objective of this study was to compare short-term mortality and safety outcomes between the two treatments using a large national database.MethodsPatients presenting with acute PE were identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2009 to 2012. Comorbidities, clinical characteristics, and invasive procedures were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD) codes and the Elixhauser comorbidity index. To adjust for anticipated baseline differences between the two treatment groups, propensity score matching was used to create a matched ST cohort with clinical and comorbid characteristics similar to those of the CDI cohort. Subgroups of patients with and without hemodynamic shock were analyzed separately. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, overall bleeding risk, and hemorrhagic stroke risk.ResultsOf 263,955 subjects with acute PE, 1.63% (n = 4272) received ST and 0.55% (n = 1455) received CDI. ST subjects were older, had more chronic comorbidities, and had higher rates of respiratory failure (ST, 27.9% [n = 1192]; CDI, 21.2% [n = 308]; P < .001) and shock (ST, 18.2% [n = 779]; CDI, 12% [n = 174]; P < .001). CDI subjects had higher rates of concurrent deep venous thrombosis (ST, 35.8% [n = 1530]; CDI, 45.9% [n = 668]; P < .001) and vena cava filter placement (ST, 31.1% [n = 1328]; CDI, 57% [n = 830]; P < .001). In the unmatched cohort, ST subjects had higher in-hospital mortality (ST, 16.7% [n = 714]; CDI, 9.4% [n = 136]; P < .001) and hemorrhagic stroke rates (ST, 2.2% [n = 96]; CDI, 1.4% [n = 20]; P = .041). After propensity matching, 1430 patients remained in each cohort; baseline characteristics of the matched cohorts did not differ significantly using standardized difference comparisons. Analysis of the matched cohorts did not demonstrate a significant effect of CDI on in-hospital mortality or overall bleeding risk but did show a significant protective effect against hemorrhagic stroke compared with ST (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.82; P = .01). Subgroup analysis showed decreased odds of hemorrhagic stroke for CDI in the nonshock subgroup and increased procedural bleeding for CDI but no difference in hemorrhagic stroke risk in the shock subgroup.ConclusionsST for acute PE may not improve in-hospital mortality compared with CDI but increases the overall risk of hemorrhagic stroke compared with CDI. Further prospective studies should examine the comparative effectiveness and safety of these two treatments.

Dataset Information

Successful Surgical Embolectomy for a Rapidly Deteriorating Patient with Pulmonary Embolism and Hemorrhagic Stroke.

Publications

Successful Surgical Embolectomy for a Rapidly Deteriorating Patient with Pulmonary Embolism and Hemorrhagic Stroke.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets