Modified stent-graft for emergent repair of blunt thoracic aortic injury.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Battocchio P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8302879 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Modified stent-graft for emergent repair of blunt thoracic aortic injury.
Battocchio Piero P Piazza Michele M Squizzato Francesco F Antonello Michele M
JTCVS techniques 20200404
Similar Datasets
Project description:PurposeTo assess outcomes of a low-profile thoracic stent-graft in the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies.MethodsA retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with aortic thoracic pathologies treated with the RelayPro device in two university hospitals between October 2018 and July 2019.Results23 patients (65% men; mean age 63.4 ± 15 years) were treated. Pathologies included aortic dissections (n = 10), 5 residual type A (22%) and 5 type B (22%), 6 degenerative aortic aneurysms (26%), 4 penetrating aortic ulcers (17%), and aortic erosion, intramural hematoma and aortic rupture (n = 1 and 4% in each case). Two cases (9%) were emergent and two urgent. Proximal landing was achieved in zones 0 (4%), 1 (4%), 2 (43%), and 3 (26%). Five grafts were frozen elephant trunk extensions. Technical success was 100% with accurate device deployment in the intended landing zone of the aortic arch in all 23 patients and with no Ia/III endoleaks and three (13%) type II endoleaks. Apposition was adequate in 96%. Two patients had post-implantation syndromes (one fever, one leukocytosis). Mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 3.7 months (range, 2-16) with no other complications, secondary interventions or conversions to open surgery. There was no 30-day mortality and no aortic-related mortality; all-cause mortality was 4% during follow-up.ConclusionA 3-4 French reduced profile in the current generation of stent-grafts facilitates TEVAR particularly in patients with smaller vessels access. Early safety and effectiveness outcomes are favorable, even in endpoints such as deployment accuracy and apposition which may be surrogates for longer-term clinical success and durability.
| S-EPMC7676711 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Numerical simulations of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) may be implemented in the preoperative workflow if credible and reliable. We present the application of a TEVAR simulation methodology to an 82-year-old woman with a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer in the left hemiarch, that underwent a left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypass and consequent TEVAR in zone 2. During the intervention, kinking of the distal thoracic stent graft occurred and the simulation was able to reproduce this event. This report highlights the potential and reliability of TEVAR simulations to predict perioperative adverse events and short-term postoperative technical results.
| S-EPMC10457440 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A traumatic thoracic aortic injury is fatal in the majority of cases. Surviving the aortic injury in addition to the myriad of associated trauma requires comprehensive medical management from many medical services. Balancing these services and coordinating the medical care requires free and open communication between services. Although one might assume a thoracic aortic injury takes precedence over other injuries, an organized plan of care in which the morbidity of the injury as well as the consequences of treatment of each injury helps provide an appropriate "rank order" in the treatment process. A patient with a thoracic aortic injury can be observed for several days while additional injuries are treated, as long as appropriate blood pressure controls are observed. The treatment order for multiple injuries must be reevaluated on a regular basis to adjust for changes in the overall clinical condition. This rank order to treatment and scheduled treatment plan allows for appropriate imaging, evaluation, and coordination of services in preparation for the placement of a thoracic aortic stent graft. The goal of treatment is to reduce the risk of aortic rupture and subsequent fatal hemorrhage. Choosing an open surgical repair versus an endovascular stent graft depends upon physician expertise and clinical status of the patient. In the appropriate clinical setting, endovascular repair of the thoracic aortic injury has become the treatment of choice at the authors' institution in patients with significant operative risks and extensive comorbid injuries. Specific characteristics of the injured aorta also dictate the type of endovascular device required for repair. Case reviews of a patient with blunt trauma and a patient with penetrating trauma used to demonstrate clinical parameters, imaging options, and details of stent graft choice and placement, are presented followed by a review of the literature.
| S-EPMC3140249 | biostudies-other
Project description:Consideration for oversizing the proximal stent graft is suggested in endovascular aortic repair. However, a special recommendation for the proximal oversizing ratio (OSR) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is ambiguous. This study aims to evaluate the effect of different degrees of the proximal oversizing ratio (OSR) on risk of type IA endoleak (TIAEL) in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients with rAAA undergoing emergency endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Our study included 134 rAAA patients undergoing emergent EVAR, and we did not observe a significant association between hemodynamic instability and risk of T1AEL (HR 3.89, 95%CI 0.40-37.75, p = 0.24). All three T1AELs in the hemodynamically unstable subgroup were observed in patients with OSR ≤ 30%, but no significant difference was found regarding T1AEL between patients with OSR > 30% and OSR ≤ 30% (0.00% vs. 11.11%, p = 0.19). As for hemodynamically stable patients, OSR > 20% was associated with a significantly decreased risk of T1AEL (HR 0.03, 95%CI 0.01-0.53, p = 0.016). In conclusion, a proximal OSR > 20% is associated with a decreased risk of T1AEL in hemodynamically stable patients, while an OSR > 30% did not add an additional advantage of lowering the risk of T1AEL in hemodynamically unstable patients.
| S-EPMC10707288 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The standard treatment for ruptured type A aortic dissection is open surgical repair. We have described the case of a frail patient with home oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and prior free vein circumflex coronary artery bypass who had presented with a ruptured type A aortic dissection and was deemed too high risk for open surgery. On July 7, 2017, the patient underwent emergent endovascular ruptured ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair with a chimney stent graft to a free vein coronary bypass that originated from the ascending thoracic aorta. The procedure was uneventful, and the patient was discharged home on postoperative day 1.
| S-EPMC10164891 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThis study explored the clinical efficacy and hemodynamic effects of the micropore stent graft (MSG) that could promote aortic remodeling and preserve important organ branches.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 26 patients who underwent endovascular repair using an MSG for DeBakey types I and III TAD at our center between December 2014 and December 2017. The main efficacy parameters were rupture of the false lumen or dissection-related death, conversion to open repair, secondary reintervention, branch vessel patency, and the hemodynamic effects of TAD at 12 months.ResultsDissection rupture, dissection-related mortality, conversion to open repair, and secondary reintervention rates at 12 months were 0, 3.9, 0, and 0%, respectively. In the 24 patients with more than 6 months of follow-up, micropore stents were implanted to cover 39 openings in aortic arch branches, 91.7% (22/24) presented with complete thrombosis in the false lumen, 8.3% (2/24) presented with partial thrombosis in the false lumen, 35.2% (6/17) presented with a thrombus in the false lumen that was completely absorbed, and all 39 branches were patent. After surgery, pressure peak value and fluctuation along with the degree and range of unstable blood flow in the aortic lumen decreased.ConclusionsFor type I and type III thoracic artic dissection, endovascular treatment with an MSG may be a safe and effective treatment option with a good midterm outcome.
| S-EPMC7078903 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThis study aimed to reveal the association between lower-profile stent graft (LPSG) and embolism during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for non-dissecting distal arch and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm.MethodsThis study reviewed data of 35 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with LPSG (27 males; age: 77 ± 9.2 years) and 312 who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with conventional-sized stent graft (CSSG) (247 males; age: 77 ± 7.4 years) from 2009 to 2021.ResultsThe rate of total embolic events was significantly lower in the LPSG group (0/35 [0%]) than the CSSG group (34/312 [11.2%]) (P = 0.035). Shaggy aorta (odds ratio: 5.220; P < 0.001) were identified as positive embolic event predictors. The rate of total embolic events in 68 patients with shaggy aorta (12 in LPSG/56 in CSSG) was significantly lower in the LPSG group (0/12 [0%]) than the CSSG group (19/56 [34%]) (P = 0.015). The rate of total embolic events in 279 patients with the non-shaggy aorta (23 in LPSG/256 in CSSG) reveals no difference between the 2 groups (0 [0%]/16 [6.3%]) (P = 0.377).ConclusionsLPSG usage could reduce embolism in thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and the difference was more pronounced in patients with the shaggy aorta. LPSG might be beneficial in preventing embolism in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for patients with a shaggy aorta.
| S-EPMC10191628 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: There is a paucity of data concerning the feasibility and value of thoracic aortic stent graft implantation (TEVAR) applications for removing tumors infiltrating the aortic wall. This analysis aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of TEVAR and monitor the perioperative risks of morbidity and mortality. Additionally, a literature review was performed. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed on patients who received TEVAR prior to thoracic malignancy resection between January 2010 and April 2024. The primary endpoint was technical success. Results: A total of 15 patients (median age: 67 years; range: 23-75; 66.7% female) received TEVAR prior to thoracic surgery of different tumor entities. In 80% of cases (n = 12), the proximal landing zone was in aortic zone 3. In three cases, the supra-aortic debranching of LSA and/or LCCA via bypass implantation or in situ laser fenestration was necessary. No postoperative endograft-related complications were observed. In eight patients, aortic wall infiltration was confirmed intraoperatively. In total, R0 resection was achieved in seven patients (46.7%). The 30-day mortality rate was 6.7% (n = 1). Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%), while procedural success was achieved in 80% due to incomplete tumor resection in three patients. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest analysis to date that confirms the results of previous smaller studies. Aortic stent grafting prior to thoracic tumor resection allows for extensive resection while maintaining low morbidity and a low 30-day mortality risk.
| S-EPMC11477123 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundSimultaneous treatment of multilevel aortic disease is controversial due to the theoretic increase in morbidity. This study was conducted to define the outcomes in patients treated electively with simultaneous thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) and abdominal aortic endovascular endografting for synchronous aortic pathology.MethodsPatients treated with simultaneous TEVAR and endovascular aneurysm repair (T&E) at the University of Florida were identified from a prospectively maintained endovascular aortic registry and compared with those treated with TEVAR alone (TA). The study excluded patients with urgent or emergency indications, thoracoabdominal or mycotic aneurysm, and those requiring chimney stents, fenestrations, or visceral debranching procedures. Demographics, anatomic characteristics, operative details, and periprocedural morbidity were recorded. Mortality and reintervention were estimated using life-table analysis.ResultsFrom 2001 to 2011, 595 patients underwent TEVAR, of whom 457 had elective repair. Twenty-two (18 men, 82%) were identified who were treated electively with simultaneous T&E. Mean ± standard deviation age was 66 ± 9 years, and median follow-up was 8.8 months (range, 1-34 months). Operative indications for the procedure included dissection-related pathology in 10 (45%) and various combinations of degenerative etiologies in 12 (55%). Compared with TA, T&E patients had significantly higher blood loss (P < .0001), contrast exposure (P < .0001), fluoroscopy time (P < .0001), and operative time (P < .0001). The temporary spinal cord ischemia rate was 13.6% (n = 3) for the T&E group and 6.0% for TA (P = .15); however, the permanent spinal cord ischemia rate was 4% for both groups (P = .96). The 30-day mortality for T&E was 4.5% (n = 1) compared with 2.1% (n = 10) for TA. Temporary renal injury (defined by a 25% increase over baseline creatinine) occurred in two T&E patients (9.1%), with none requiring permanent hemodialysis; no significant difference was noted between the two groups (P = .14). One-year mortality and freedom from reintervention in the T&E patients were 81% and 91%, respectively.ConclusionsAcceptable short-term morbidity and mortality can be achieved with T&E compared with TA, despite longer operative times, greater blood loss, and higher contrast exposure. There was a trend toward higher rates of renal and spinal cord injury, so implementation of strategies to reduce the potential of these complications or consideration of staged repair is recommended. Short-term reintervention rates are low, but longer follow-up and greater patient numbers are needed to determine procedural durability and applicability.
| S-EPMC3766713 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with fenestrated surgeon-modified stent-grafts (f-SMSGs) is becoming an option for treating type B aortic dissection (TBAD) involving the aortic arch. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of this technique.MethodsA retrospective multicenter study was conducted, involving consecutive patients from three medical centers in China who underwent TEVAR with f-SMSG for TBAD. A new technique called "Lu's direction-turnover technique" was employed to align the fenestrations with supra-aortic vessels.ResultsFrom March 2016 to January 2020, 117 patients diagnosed with TBAD were deemed eligible for inclusion. The technical success rate was 94% (n=110). The estimated 30-day survival rate was 97.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 94.5% to 100.0%], with freedom from re-intervention estimated at 95.7% (95% CI: 92.0% to 99.4%). The median follow-up period was 27 months (interquartile range, 19 to 35 months). The estimated survival rate at 27 months was 94.9% (95% CI: 90.8% to 98.9%) and the rate of freedom from re-intervention was 91.5% (95% CI: 86.3% to 96.6%). Cases of retrograde type A aortic dissection, stroke and endoleaks were documented. Five cases of retrograde type A aortic dissection were documented, with three occurring within 30 days and one during the follow-up. Four cases of stroke were recorded, with one occurring within 30 days and three during the follow-up. Furthermore, eleven cases of endoleaks were recorded, with one occurring within 30 days and ten during the follow-up.ConclusionsClinically acceptable technical success and prognosis were observed in a cohort with TEVAR with f-SMSG for the treatment of TBAD involving the aortic arch, which necessitated revascularization of the supra-aortic vessels. Further comparative studies are required to validate the benefits of this approach.
| S-EPMC11494561 | biostudies-literature