Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience relapses and sustained disability progression. Since 2004, the number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS has grown substantially. As a result, patients, healthcare providers, and insurers are increasingly interested in comparative efficacy and safety evaluations to distinguish between treatment options, but head-to-head studies between DMTs are limited.Objective
The aim of the current study was to compare efficacy and safety outcomes with the DMTs ozanimod and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) to adjust for cross-trial differences in study design and population.Methods
A systematic literature review was performed to identify clinical studies evaluating th
SUBMITTER: Cohan S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8310468 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature