Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Kea (Nestor notabilis) fail a loose-string connectivity task.


ABSTRACT: Naïve individuals of some bird species can rapidly solve vertical string-pulling tasks with virtually no errors. This has led to various hypotheses being proposed which suggest that birds mentally simulate the effects of their actions on strings. A competing embodied cognition hypothesis proposes that this behaviour is instead modulated by perceptual-motor feedback loops, where feedback of the reward moving closer acts as an internal motivator for functional behaviours, such as pull-stepping. To date, the kea parrot has produced some of the best performances of any bird species at string-pulling tasks. Here, we tested the predictions of the four leading hypotheses for the cognition underpinning bird string-pulling by presenting kea with a horizontal connectivity task where only one of two loose strings was connected to the reward, both before and after receiving perceptual-motor feedback experience. We find that kea fail the connectivity task both before and after perceptual-motor feedback experience, suggesting not only that kea do not mentally simulate their string-pulling actions, but also that perceptual-motor feedback alone is insufficient in eliciting successful performance in the horizontal connectivity task. This suggests a more complex interplay of cognitive factors underlies this iconic example of animal problem-solving.

SUBMITTER: Bastos APM 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8322428 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Kea (Nestor notabilis) fail a loose-string connectivity task.

Bastos Amalia P M APM   Wood Patrick M PM   Taylor Alex H AH  

Scientific reports 20210729 1


Naïve individuals of some bird species can rapidly solve vertical string-pulling tasks with virtually no errors. This has led to various hypotheses being proposed which suggest that birds mentally simulate the effects of their actions on strings. A competing embodied cognition hypothesis proposes that this behaviour is instead modulated by perceptual-motor feedback loops, where feedback of the reward moving closer acts as an internal motivator for functional behaviours, such as pull-stepping. To  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6930200 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10787887 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8433200 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9579195 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8492579 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7979628 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10083992 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10282571 | biostudies-literature
| PRJNA704014 | ENA
| PRJNA264991 | ENA