Dataset Information

Zooming into Focus Groups: Strategies for Qualitative Research in the Era of Social Distancing.

ABSTRACT: Qualitative research methods are important and have become increasingly prominent in medical education and research. The reason is simple: many pressing questions in these fields require qualitative approaches to elicit nuanced insights and additional meaning beyond standard quantitative measurements in surveys or observatons. Among the most common qualitative data collection methods are structured or semistructured in-person interviews and focus groups, in which participants describe their experiences relevant to the research question at hand. In the era of physical and social distancing because of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, little guidance exists for strategies for conducting focus groups or semistructured interviews. Here we describe our experience with, and recommendations for, conducting remote focus groups and/or interviews in the era of social distancing. Specifically, we discuss best practice recommendations for researchers using video teleconferencing programs to continue qualitative research during the COVID-19 pandemic.

SUBMITTER: Santhosh L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8357072 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Zooming into Focus Groups: Strategies for Qualitative Research in the Era of Social Distancing.

Santhosh Lekshmi L Rojas Juan C JC Lyons Patrick G PG

ATS scholar 20210208 2

Qualitative research methods are important and have become increasingly prominent in medical education and research. The reason is simple: many pressing questions in these fields require qualitative approaches to elicit nuanced insights and additional meaning beyond standard quantitative measurements in surveys or observatons. Among the most common qualitative data collection methods are structured or semistructured in-person interviews and focus groups, in which participants describe their expe ...[more]

PMID: 34409412

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundChronic lower limb pain is common in children and adolescents and is frequently managed by podiatrists. Due to the complexities of understanding the cause of chronic pain, clinicians may experience uncertainty around the diagnosis, which in turn may impact their communication and management approaches. Limited research explores how podiatrists manage chronic lower limb pain in children, especially in the presence of diagnostic uncertainty. This study aimed to explore the management strategies including language that podiatrists report using to address the pain experience of children with chronic lower limb pain and to investigate if and how the reported management strategies used by podiatrists to address the pain experience of children with chronic lower limb pain vary based upon the level of diagnostic uncertainty.MethodsEight focus groups were conducted with a total of 48 podiatrists. Participants were presented with three vignettes, each describing a child with chronic lower limb pain. They were then asked to discuss their certainty in the child's diagnosis presented and their approaches to explain and manage the child's pain. Audio data were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Three key themes were generated: Language strategies, non-verbal communication strategies and treatment strategies.ResultsPodiatrists were overall certain in the diagnosis presented in vignettes 1 (calcaneal apophysitis) and 2 (juvenile idiopathic arthritis); however, they expressed significant uncertainty in vignette 3, which was written to elicit uncertainty presenting a case with generalised lower limb pain. Many groups fixated on the Beighton score of 5/9 and interpreted this to mean hypermobility, which is inconsistent with the current clinical guidance. Podiatrists used similar language strategies across all 3 vignettes and supported their language strategies with non-verbal communication strategies. Podiatrists also discussed activity modification, passive and self-care strategies and building a team as the treatment strategies they would use.ConclusionsThis study highlights the variety of clinical management strategies used by approaches and highlights how their approach may change depending on their certainty in the diagnosis.

Project description:ObjectiveThis study explored UK public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation related to the COVID-19 pandemic.DesignThis qualitative study comprised five focus groups, carried out online during the early stages of the UK's stay at home order ('lockdown'), and analysed using a thematic approach.SettingFocus groups took place via online videoconferencing.ParticipantsParticipants (n=27) were all UK residents aged 18 years and older, representing a range of gender, ethnic, age and occupational backgrounds.ResultsQualitative analysis revealed four main themes: (1) loss-participants' loss of (in-person) social interaction, loss of income and loss of structure and routine led to psychological and emotional 'losses' such as loss of motivation, loss of meaning and loss of self-worth; (2) criticisms of government communication-participants reported a lack of trust in government and a lack of clarity in the guidelines around social distancing and isolation; (3) adherence-participants reported high self-adherence to social distancing guidelines but reported seeing or hearing of non-adherence in others; (4) uncertainty around social reintegration and the future-some participants felt they would have lingering concerns over social contact while others were eager to return to high levels of social activity.Most participants, and particularly those in low-paid or precarious employment, reported feeling that the social distancing and isolation associated with COVID-19 policy has had negative impacts on their mental health and well-being during the early stages of the UK's 'lockdown'.ConclusionsA rapid response is necessary in terms of public health programming to mitigate the mental health impacts of COVID-19 social distancing and isolation. Social distancing and isolation 'exit strategies' must account for the fact that, although some individuals will voluntarily or habitually continue to socially distance, others will seek high levels of social engagement as soon as possible.

Dataset Information

Zooming into Focus Groups: Strategies for Qualitative Research in the Era of Social Distancing.

Publications

Zooming into Focus Groups: Strategies for Qualitative Research in the Era of Social Distancing.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets