Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a prospective study.


ABSTRACT:

Importance

Identifying undetected clinical signs is imperative in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2.

Objective

To establish the prevalence of clinical gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Clinical outcomes and recovery rates associated with gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions were also assessed.

Design

A prospective study was performed in 80 patients admitted to Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (Spain) for COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were re-evaluated in the ward daily until discharge. Gustatory and olfactory dysfunction symptoms were retrospectively collected from emergency room (ER) charts after first assessments. Follow-up was performed in telemedicine consultation.

Setting

The single-centre study was performed in a hospitalisation ward at a university hospital.

Participants

Consecutive patients meeting hospitalisation criteria for COVID-19 pneumonia were eligible. Study exclusion criteria were patients who could not speak, had previous gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions or whose PCR tests for SARS-CoV-19 were negative.

Interventions

Systematic assessment of gustatory and olfactory symptoms with standardised questions.

Outcomes

Prevalence of gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Results

Of the 80 study subjects, 62.5% were male and the median age was 57 years. Half of the cohort (n=40) presented with comorbidities. The prevalence of chemosensitive disorder was 73.8% (n=59) (95% CI: 63.8 to 83.8), although self-reported symptoms were recorded in only 26.3% (n=21) of patients in the ER. Gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions were observed in 58.8% (n=47) and 55% (n=44) of cases, respectively. They were also the first symptoms in 25% (n=20) of patients. Anosmia was associated with ageusia, OR: 7, 95% CI: 2.3 to 21.8, p=0.001). No differences in clinical outcomes were observed when patients with and without gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions were compared. Recovery rates were 20% (n=10) and 85% (n=42) at days 7 and 45, respectively.

Conclusion

The prevalence of gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions in COVID-19 pneumonia was much higher than in self-report. Presence of gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions was not a predictor of clinical outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Inciarte A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8375450 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a prospective study.

Inciarte Alexy A   Cardozo Celia C   Chumbita Mariana M   Alcubilla Pau P   Torres Berta B   González Cordón Ana A   Rico Veronica V   Aguero Daiana D   García-Pouton Nicole N   Hernández-Meneses Marta M   Albiach Laia L   Meira Fernanda F   De la Mora Lorena L   Linares Laura L   Puerta-Alcalde Pedro P   Macaya Irene I   Mensa Josep J   Laguno Montse M   Ambrosioni Juan J   Ramos Angela A   Morata Laura L   Bodro Marta M   Moreno-García Estela E   Moreno Antonio A   Sola Montse M   Rojas Jhon J   Leal Lorna L   Torres Manuel M   Garcia-Vidal Carolina C   Martínez Jose Antonio JA   Alobid Isam I   Soriano Alex A   Garcia Felipe F  

BMJ open 20210817 8


<h4>Importance</h4>Identifying undetected clinical signs is imperative in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2.<h4>Objective</h4>To establish the prevalence of clinical gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Clinical outcomes and recovery rates associated with gustatory and olfactory dysfunctions were also assessed.<h4>Design</h4>A prospective study was performed in 80 patients admitted to Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (Spain) for COVID-19 pneumonia. Patients were re-ev  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7482593 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7779103 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8386443 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8286849 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8783175 | biostudies-literature
2021-12-09 | GSE189610 | GEO
| S-EPMC7331108 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7309687 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7134551 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8915119 | biostudies-literature