Dataset Information

The Dutch Data Warehouse, a multicenter and full-admission electronic health records database for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has underlined the urgent need for reliable, multicenter, and full-admission intensive care data to advance our understanding of the course of the disease and investigate potential treatment strategies. In this study, we present the Dutch Data Warehouse (DDW), the first multicenter electronic health record (EHR) database with full-admission data from critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Methods

A nation-wide data sharing collaboration was launched at the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020. All hospitals in the Netherlands were asked to participate and share pseudonymized EHR data from adult critically ill COVID-19 patients. Data included patient demographics, clinical observations, administered medication, laboratory determinations, and data from vital sign monitors and life support devices. Data sharing agreements were signed with participating hospitals before any data transfers took place. Data were extracted from the local EHRs with prespecified queries and combined into a staging dataset through an extract-transform-load (ETL) pipeline. In the consecutive processing pipeline, data were mapped to a common concept vocabulary and enriched with derived concepts. Data validation was a continuous process throughout the project. All participating hospitals have access to the DDW. Within legal and ethical boundaries, data are available to clinicians and researchers.

Results

Out of the 81 intensive care units in the Netherlands, 66 participated in the collaboration, 47 have signed the data sharing agreement, and 35 have shared their data. Data from 25 hospitals have passed through the ETL and processing pipeline. Currently, 3464 patients are included in the DDW, both from wave 1 and wave 2 in the Netherlands. More than 200 million clinical data points are available. Overall ICU mortality was 24.4%. Respiratory and hemodynamic parameters were most frequently measured throughout a patient's stay. For each patient, all administered medication and their daily fluid balance were available. Missing data are reported for each descriptive.

Conclusions

In this study, we show that EHR data from critically ill COVID-19 patients may be lawfully collected and can be combined into a data warehouse. These initiatives are indispensable to advance medical data science in the field of intensive care medicine.

SUBMITTER: Fleuren LM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8381710 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Dutch Data Warehouse, a multicenter and full-admission electronic health records database for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Fleuren Lucas M LM Dam Tariq A TA Tonutti Michele M de Bruin Daan P DP Lalisang Robbert C A RCA Gommers Diederik D Cremer Olaf L OL Bosman Rob J RJ Rigter Sander S Wils Evert-Jan EJ Frenzel Tim T Dongelmans Dave A DA de Jong Remko R Peters Marco M Kamps Marlijn J A MJA Ramnarain Dharmanand D Nowitzky Ralph R Nooteboom Fleur G C A FGCA de Ruijter Wouter W Urlings-Strop Louise C LC Smit Ellen G M EGM Mehagnoul-Schipper D Jannet DJ Dormans Tom T de Jager Cornelis P C CPC Hendriks Stefaan H A SHA Achterberg Sefanja S Oostdijk Evelien E Reidinga Auke C AC Festen-Spanjer Barbara B Brunnekreef Gert B GB Cornet Alexander D AD van den Tempel Walter W Boelens Age D AD Koetsier Peter P Lens Judith J Faber Harald J HJ Karakus A A Entjes Robert R de Jong Paul P Rettig Thijs C D TCD Arbous Sesmu S Vonk Sebastiaan J J SJJ Fornasa Mattia M Machado Tomas T Houwert Taco T Hovenkamp Hidde H Noorduijn-Londono Roberto R Quintarelli Davide D Scholtemeijer Martijn G MG de Beer Aletta A AA Cina Giovanni G Beudel Martijn M Herter Willem E WE Girbes Armand R J ARJ Hoogendoorn Mark M Thoral Patrick J PJ Elbers Paul W G PWG

Critical care (London, England) 20210823 1

<h4>Background</h4>The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has underlined the urgent need for reliable, multicenter, and full-admission intensive care data to advance our understanding of the course of the disease and investigate potential treatment strategies. In this study, we present the Dutch Data Warehouse (DDW), the first multicenter electronic health record (EHR) database with full-admission data from critically ill COVID-19 patients.<h4>Methods</h4>A nation-wide data sharing col ...[more]

PMID: 34425864

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThere were controversies over the relationship between Anion gap (AG) and mortality in critically ill patients. Therefore, a large multicenter cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association of AG and mortality in large-scale intensive care units (ICUs) patients.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included adult ICU patients enrolled from eICU Collaborative Research Database. According to initial serum AG upon ICU admission, patients were divided into three groups: AG < 8 mmol/L, 8 ≤ AG ≤ 16 mmol/L, and AG > 16 mmol/L. Logistic regression models were built to investigate the association between serum AG and ICU and hospital mortalities. Serum AG was added into Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV score and the model discrimination was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves. The relationship between serum AG and mortalities in patients with different acid-base status and serum lactate were also evaluated. An external validation was performed with the Critical care database comprising patients with infection at Zigong Fourth People's Hospital.ResultsA total of 8520 patients entered the final cohort. There are 42 patients with serum AG < 8 mmol/L, 3238 patients with 8 ≤ AG ≤ 16 mmol/L, and 5240 patients with AG > 16 mmol/L. Serum AG > 16 mmol/L is related with increased ICU mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.530; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.305-1.794) and hospital mortality (OR, 1.618; 95% CI, 1.415-1.849), compared with 8 ≤ AG ≤ 16 mmol/L. Adding Serum AG to APACHE IV score could statistically improve the prediction of ICU (0.770 [0.761-0.779] to 0.774 [0.765-0.783], P = 0.001) and hospital mortalities (0.756 [0.747-0.765] to 0.761 [0.751-0.770], P = 0.012). The associations between serum AG and mortalities remain robust in patients with different acid-base statuses and serum lactate. The findings are validated in the external cohort.ConclusionsInitial serum AG > 16 mmol/L after ICU admission is associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients.

Project description:BackgroundMedical coding is used for a variety of activities, from observational studies to hospital billing. However, comorbidities tend to be under-reported by medical coders. The aim of this study was to develop an algorithm to detect comorbidities in electronic health records (EHR) by using a clinical data warehouse (CDW) and a knowledge database.MethodsWe enriched the Theriaque pharmaceutical database with the French national Comorbidities List to identify drugs associated with at least one major comorbid condition and diagnoses associated with a drug indication. Then, we compared the drug indications in the Theriaque database with the ICD-10 billing codes in EHR to detect potentially missing comorbidities based on drug prescriptions. Finally, we improved comorbidity detection by matching drug prescriptions and laboratory test results. We tested the obtained algorithm by using two retrospective datasets extracted from the Rennes University Hospital (RUH) CDW. The first dataset included all adult patients hospitalized in the ear, nose, throat (ENT) surgical ward between October and December 2014 (ENT dataset). The second included all adult patients hospitalized at RUH between January and February 2015 (general dataset). We reviewed medical records to find written evidence of the suggested comorbidities in current or past stays.ResultsAmong the 22,132 Common Units of Dispensation (CUD) codes present in the Theriaque database, 19,970 drugs (90.2%) were associated with one or several ICD-10 diagnoses, based on their indication, and 11,162 (50.4%) with at least one of the 4878 comorbidities from the comorbidity list. Among the 122 patients of the ENT dataset, 75.4% had at least one drug prescription without corresponding ICD-10 code. The comorbidity diagnoses suggested by the algorithm were confirmed in 44.6% of the cases. Among the 4312 patients of the general dataset, 68.4% had at least one drug prescription without corresponding ICD-10 code. The comorbidity diagnoses suggested by the algorithm were confirmed in 20.3% of reviewed cases.ConclusionsThis simple algorithm based on combining accessible and immediately reusable data from knowledge databases, drug prescriptions and laboratory test results can detect comorbidities.

Project description:ObjectivesMultidisciplinary PICU teams must effectively share information while caring for critically ill children. Clinical documentation helps clinicians develop a shared understanding of the patient's diagnosis, which informs decision-making. However, diagnosis-related documentation in the PICU is understudied, thus limiting insights into how pediatric intensivists convey their diagnostic reasoning. Our objective was to describe how pediatric critical care clinicians document patients' diagnoses at PICU admission.DesignRetrospective mixed methods study describing diagnosis documentation in electronic health records.SettingAcademic tertiary referral PICU.PatientsChildren 0-17 years old admitted nonelectively to a single PICU over 1 year.InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsOne hundred PICU admission notes for 96 unique patients were reviewed. In 87% of notes, both attending physicians and residents or advanced practice providers documented a primary diagnosis; in 13%, primary diagnoses were documented by residents or advanced practice providers alone. Most diagnoses (72%) were written as narrative free text, 11% were documented as problem lists/billing codes, and 17% used both formats. At least one rationale was documented to justify the primary diagnosis in 91% of notes. Diagnostic uncertainty was present in 52% of notes, most commonly suggested by clinicians' use of words indicating uncertainty (65%) and documentation of differential diagnoses (60%). Clinicians' integration and interpretation of information varied in terms of: 1) organization of diagnosis narratives, 2) use of contextual details to clarify the diagnosis, and 3) expression of diagnostic uncertainty.ConclusionsIn this descriptive study, most PICU admission notes documented a rationale for the primary diagnosis and expressed diagnostic uncertainty. Clinicians varied widely in how they organized diagnostic information, used contextual details to clarify the diagnosis, and expressed uncertainty. Future work is needed to determine how diagnosis narratives affect clinical decision-making, patient care, and outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundNecrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are rare but serious and rapidly progressive infections characterized by necrosis of subcutaneous tissue, fascia and even muscle. The care pathway of patients with NSTIs is poorly understood. A better characterization of the care trajectory of these patients and a better identification of patients at risk of a complicated evolution, requiring prolonged hospitalization, multiple surgical re-interventions, or readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU), is an essential prerequisite to improve their care. The main objective of this study is to obtain large-scale data on the care pathway of these patients. We performed a retrospective multicenter observational cohort study in 13 Great Paris area hospitals, including patients hospitalized between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 in the ICU for surgically confirmed NSTIs.Results170 patients were included. The median duration of stay in ICU and hospital was 8 (3-17) and 37 (14-71) days, respectively. The median time from admission to first surgical debridement was 1 (0-2) day but 69.9% of patients were re-operated with a median of 1 (0-3) additional debridement. Inter-hospital transfer was necessary in 52.4% of patients. 80.2% of patients developed organ failures during the course of ICU stay with 51.8% of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, 77.2% needing vasopressor support and 27.7% renal replacement therapy. In-ICU and in-hospital mortality rates were 21.8% and 28.8%, respectively. There was no significant difference between patients with abdomino-perineal NSTIs (n = 33) and others (n = 137) in terms of in-hospital or ICU mortality. Yet, immunocompromised patients (n = 43) showed significantly higher ICU and in-hospital mortality rates than non-immunocompromised patients (n = 127) (37.2% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.009, and 53.5% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001). Factors associated with a complicated course were the presence of a polymicrobial infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR = 3.18 (1.37-7.35); p = 0.007], of a bacteremia [aOR = 3.29 (1.14-9.52); p = 0.028] and a higher SAPS II score [aOR = 1.05 (1.02-1.07); p < 0.0001]. 62.3% of patients were re-hospitalized within 6 months.ConclusionIn this retrospective multicenter study, we showed that patients with NSTI required complex management and are major consumers of care. Two-thirds of them underwent a complicated hospital course, associated with a higher SAPS II score, a polymicrobial NSTI and a bacteremia.

Project description:BackgroundOften missing from or uncertain in a biomedical data warehouse (BDW), vital status after discharge is central to the value of a BDW in medical research. The French National Mortality Database (FNMD) offers open-source nominative records of every death. Matching large-scale BDWs records with the FNMD combines multiple challenges: absence of unique common identifiers between the 2 databases, names changing over life, clerical errors, and the exponential growth of the number of comparisons to compute.ObjectiveWe aimed to develop a new algorithm for matching BDW records to the FNMD and evaluated its performance.MethodsWe developed a deterministic algorithm based on advanced data cleaning and knowledge of the naming system and the Damerau-Levenshtein distance (DLD). The algorithm's performance was independently assessed using BDW data of 3 university hospitals: Lille, Nantes, and Rennes. Specificity was evaluated with living patients on January 1, 2016 (ie, patients with at least 1 hospital encounter before and after this date). Sensitivity was evaluated with patients recorded as deceased between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2020. The DLD-based algorithm was compared to a direct matching algorithm with minimal data cleaning as a reference.ResultsAll centers combined, sensitivity was 11% higher for the DLD-based algorithm (93.3%, 95% CI 92.8-93.9) than for the direct algorithm (82.7%, 95% CI 81.8-83.6; P<.001). Sensitivity was superior for men at 2 centers (Nantes: 87%, 95% CI 85.1-89 vs 83.6%, 95% CI 81.4-85.8; P=.006; Rennes: 98.6%, 95% CI 98.1-99.2 vs 96%, 95% CI 94.9-97.1; P<.001) and for patients born in France at all centers (Nantes: 85.8%, 95% CI 84.3-87.3 vs 74.9%, 95% CI 72.8-77.0; P<.001). The DLD-based algorithm revealed significant differences in sensitivity among centers (Nantes, 85.3% vs Lille and Rennes, 97.3%, P<.001). Specificity was >98% in all subgroups. Our algorithm matched tens of millions of death records from BDWs, with parallel computing capabilities and low RAM requirements. We used the Inseehop open-source R script for this measurement.ConclusionsOverall, sensitivity/recall was 11% higher using the DLD-based algorithm than that using the direct algorithm. This shows the importance of advanced data cleaning and knowledge of a naming system through DLD use. Statistically significant differences in sensitivity between groups could be found and must be considered when performing an analysis to avoid differential biases. Our algorithm, originally conceived for linking a BDW with the FNMD, can be used to match any large-scale databases. While matching operations using names are considered sensitive computational operations, the Inseehop package released here is easy to run on premises, thereby facilitating compliance with cybersecurity local framework. The use of an advanced deterministic matching algorithm such as the DLD-based algorithm is an insightful example of combining open-source external data to improve the usage value of BDWs.

Project description:Background: Liver injury commonly occurs in patients with COVID-19. There is limited data describing the course of liver injury occurrence in patients with different disease severity, and the causes and risk factors are unknown. We aim to investigate the incidence, characteristics, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of liver injury in patients with COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted in three hospitals (Zhejiang, China). From January 19, 2020 to February 20, 2020, patients confirmed with COVID-19 (≥18 years) and without liver injury were enrolled and divided into non-critically ill and critically ill groups. The incidence and characteristics of liver injury were compared between the two groups. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and treatment outcomes between patients with or without liver injury were compared within each group. The multivariable logistic regression model was used to explore the risk factors for liver injury. Results: The mean age of 131 enrolled patients was 51.2 years (standard deviation [SD]: 16.1 years), and 70 (53.4%) patients were male. A total of 76 patients developed liver injury (mild, 40.5%; moderate, 15.3%; severe, 2.3%) with a median occurrence time of 10.0 days. Critically ill patients had higher and earlier occurrence (81.5 vs. 51.9%, 12.0 vs. 5.0 days; p < 0.001), greater injury severity (p < 0.001), and slower recovery (50.0 vs. 61.1%) of liver function than non-critically ill patients. Multivariable regression showed that the number of concomitant medications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.21) and the combination treatment of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol (OR: 3.58, 95% CI: 1.44-9.52) were risk factors for liver injury in non-critically ill patients. The metabolism of arbidol can be significantly inhibited by lopinavir/ritonavir in vitro (p < 0.005), which may be the underlying cause of drug-related liver injury. Liver injury was related to increased length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD]: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.3-5.2) and viral shedding duration (MD: 3.0, 95% CI: 1.0-4.9). Conclusions: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 suffered earlier occurrence, greater injury severity, and slower recovery from liver injury than non-critically ill patients. Drug factors were related to liver injury in non-critically ill patients. Liver injury was related to prolonged hospital stay and viral shedding duration in patients with COVID-19. Clinical Trial Registration: World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ChiCTR2000030593. Registered March 8, 2020.

Dataset Information

The Dutch Data Warehouse, a multicenter and full-admission electronic health records database for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The Dutch Data Warehouse, a multicenter and full-admission electronic health records database for critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets