Dataset Information

Improving the Assessment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS).

ABSTRACT: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) is a public health problem of epidemic proportions. The Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (FNASS) is the tool most widely used to evaluate NAS. However, it is limited by its lack of interrater reliability and standardized approach. Surveys to evaluate the FNASS were distributed to nurses at the Women and Infants Hospital in Providence, RI, USA. Infants (n = 78) treated for NAS and born to methadone-maintained mothers were examined to compare items administered from the FNASS and the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). All nurses reported that the FNASS was somewhat to very subjective. More than half reported that it was somewhat to not accurate and a new scoring method is needed to accurately diagnose NAS. Correlations between FNASS items and NNNS items showed 9 of 32 (28.1%) correlations were strong (rs > 0.5), 5 of 32 (15.6%) were moderate (0.3 < rs < 0.5), and 10 of 32 (31.3%) were weak (0.1 < rs < 0.3). Principal component factor analysis (PCA) of the NNNS explained more variance (35.1%) than PCA of NNNS and FNASS items combined (33.1%). The nursing survey supported the need for developing a more objective exam to assess NAS. NNNS exam items may be used to improve the evaluation of NAS.

SUBMITTER: Chin Foo CA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8394483 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Improving the Assessment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS).

Chin Foo Claire A CA Dansereau Lynne M LM Hawes Katheleen K Oliveira Erica L EL Lester Barry M BM

Children (Basel, Switzerland) 20210809 8

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) is a public health problem of epidemic proportions. The Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (FNASS) is the tool most widely used to evaluate NAS. However, it is limited by its lack of interrater reliability and standardized approach. Surveys to evaluate the FNASS were distributed to nurses at the Women and Infants Hospital in Providence, RI, USA. Infants (<i>n</i> = 78) treated for NAS and born to methadone-maintained mothers were examined to compare it ...[more]

PMID: 34438576

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo critically review and summarize current knowledge regarding the assessment of newborns with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).Data sourcesWe searched the following databases for articles on the assessment of newborns with NAS that were published in English between January 2014 and June 2020: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Keywords and Medical Subject Heading terms used to identify relevant research articles included neonatal abstinence syndrome; Finnegan Scale; eat, sleep, console; epigenetics; genetics; pharmacokinetics; and measurement. We independently reviewed articles for inclusion.Study selectionWe retrieved 435 articles through database searches and 17 through manual reference searches; 31 articles are included in the final review. Excluded articles were duplicates, not relevant to NAS, qualitative studies, and/or of low quality.Data extractionWe used the methodology of Whittemore and Knafl to guide this integrative review. We extracted and organized data under the following headings: author, year and country, purpose, study design, participants, measurement, biomarker (if applicable), results, limitations, recommendations, and intervention.Data synthesisThe Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scale is the most widely used instrument to measure symptoms of NAS in newborns, although it is very subjective. Recently, there has been a transition from the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scale to the eat, sleep, console method, which consists of structured assessment and intervention and has been shown to decrease length of hospital stay and total opioid treatment dose. Researchers examined biomarkers of NAS, including genetic markers and autonomic nervous system responses, on the variation in incidence and differential severity of NAS. In the included articles, women with opioid use disorder who were treated with naltrexone during pregnancy gave birth to newborns without NAS diagnoses. However, most women who were treated with buprenorphine gave birth to newborns with NAS diagnoses.ConclusionNAS negatively affects newborns in a multitude of ways, and the objective assessment and measurement of the newborn's response to withdrawal remains understudied and needs further investigation.

Project description:BackgroundMethadone, a full mu-opioid agonist, is the recommended treatment for opioid dependence during pregnancy. However, prenatal exposure to methadone is associated with a neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) characterized by central nervous system hyperirritability and autonomic nervous system dysfunction, which often requires medication and extended hospitalization. Buprenorphine, a partial mu-opioid agonist, is an alternative treatment for opioid dependence but has not been extensively studied in pregnancy.MethodsWe conducted a double-blind, double-dummy, flexible-dosing, randomized, controlled study in which buprenorphine and methadone were compared for use in the comprehensive care of 175 pregnant women with opioid dependency at eight international sites. Primary outcomes were the number of neonates requiring treatment for NAS, the peak NAS score, the total amount of morphine needed to treat NAS, the length of the hospital stay for neonates, and neonatal head circumference.ResultsTreatment was discontinued by 16 of the 89 women in the methadone group (18%) and 28 of the 86 women in the buprenorphine group (33%). A comparison of the 131 neonates whose mothers were followed to the end of pregnancy according to treatment group (with 58 exposed to buprenorphine and 73 exposed to methadone) showed that the former group required significantly less morphine (mean dose, 1.1 mg vs. 10.4 mg; P<0.0091), had a significantly shorter hospital stay (10.0 days vs. 17.5 days, P<0.0091), and had a significantly shorter duration of treatment for the neonatal abstinence syndrome (4.1 days vs. 9.9 days, P<0.003125) (P values calculated in accordance with prespecified thresholds for significance). There were no significant differences between groups in other primary or secondary outcomes or in the rates of maternal or neonatal adverse events.ConclusionsThese results are consistent with the use of buprenorphine as an acceptable treatment for opioid dependence in pregnant women. (Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00271219.).

Dataset Information

Improving the Assessment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS).

Publications

Improving the Assessment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS).

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets