Dataset Information

Laparoscopic repair of combined extra- and intraperitoneal bladder ruptures in a patient with blunt trauma: Use of the bladder suspension method.

ABSTRACT: Urinary bladder rupture is commonly due to blunt abdominal trauma rather than penetrating trauma. Intraperitoneal bladder rupture (IBR) is a concrete indication of surgical management. On the other hand, surgeons should perform surgeries in patients with extraperitoneal bladder rupture (EBR) solely in complicated cases. Uncomplicated EBR is managed conservatively. Laparoscopic repair is safe and effective for the treatment of IBR. However, there are no contemporary guidelines on the application of laparoscopy for the management of EBR. Herein, we describe a case of combined EBR and IBR in a hemodynamically stable 45-year-old patient who sustained injuries after falling. Intravesical repair of EBR and intracorporeal repair of IBR with the bladder suspension method were successfully performed with laparoscopy. This is a rare case describing the feasibility of laparoscopic suturing for combined EBR and IBR in a patient with blunt trauma.

SUBMITTER: Heo Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8399408 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Laparoscopic repair of combined extra- and intraperitoneal bladder ruptures in a patient with blunt trauma: Use of the bladder suspension method.

Heo Yoonjung Y Kim Dong Hun DH

Trauma case reports 20210824

Urinary bladder rupture is commonly due to blunt abdominal trauma rather than penetrating trauma. Intraperitoneal bladder rupture (IBR) is a concrete indication of surgical management. On the other hand, surgeons should perform surgeries in patients with extraperitoneal bladder rupture (EBR) solely in complicated cases. Uncomplicated EBR is managed conservatively. Laparoscopic repair is safe and effective for the treatment of IBR. However, there are no contemporary guidelines on the application ...[more]

PMID: 34485664

Similar Datasets

Project description:Bladder rupture occurs in only 1.6% of blunt abdominopelvic trauma cases. Although rare, bladder rupture can result in significant morbidity if undiagnosed or inappropriately managed. AUA Urotrauma Guidelines suggest that urethral catheter drainage is a standard of care for both extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal bladder rupture regardless of the need for surgical repair. However, no specific guidance is given regarding the length of catheterization. The present study seeks to summarize contemporary management of bladder trauma at our tertiary care center, assess the impact of length of catheterization on bladder injuries and complications, and develop a protocol for management of bladder injuries from time of injury to catheter removal. A retrospective review was performed on 34,413 blunt trauma cases to identify traumatic bladder ruptures over the past 10 years (January 2008-January 2018) at our tertiary care facility. Patient data were collected including age, gender, BMI, mechanism of injury, and type of injury. The primary treatment modality (surgical repair vs. catheter drainage only), length of catheterization, and post-injury complications were also assessed. Review of our institutional trauma database identified 44 patients with bladder trauma. Mean age was 41 years, mean BMI was 24.8 kg/m2, 95% were Caucasian, and 55% were female. Motor vehicle collision (MVC) was the most common mechanism, representing 45% of total injuries. Other mechanisms included falls (20%) and all-terrain vehicle (ATV) accidents (13.6%). 31 patients had extraperitoneal injury, and 13 were intraperitoneal. Pelvic fractures were present in 93%, and 39% had additional solid organ injuries. Formal cystogram was performed in 59% on presentation, and mean time to cystogram was 4 hours. Gross hematuria was noted in 95% of cases. Operative management was performed for all intraperitoneal injuries and 35.5% of extraperitoneal cases. Bladder closure in operative cases was typically performed in 2 layers with absorbable suture in a running fashion. The intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal injuries managed operatively were compared, and length of catheterization (28 d vs. 22 d, p=0.46), time from injury to normal fluorocystogram (19.8 d vs. 20.7 d, p=0.80), and time from injury to repair (4.3 vs. 60.5 h, p=0.23) were not statistically different between cohorts. Patients whose catheter remained in place for greater than 14 days had prolonged time to initial cystogram (26.6 d vs. 11.5 d) compared with those whose foley catheter was removed within 14 days. The complication rate was 21% for catheters left more than 14 days while patients whose catheter remained less than 14 days experienced no complications. The present study provides a 10-year retrospective review characterizing the presentation, management, and follow-up of bladder trauma patients at our level 1 trauma center. Based on our findings, we have developed an institutional protocol which now includes recommendations regarding length of catheterization after traumatic bladder rupture. By providing specific guidelines for initial follow-up cystogram and foley removal, we hope to decrease patient morbidity from prolonged catheterization. Further study will seek to allow multidisciplinary trauma teams to standardize management, streamline care, and minimize complications for patients presenting with traumatic bladder injuries.

Dataset Information

Laparoscopic repair of combined extra- and intraperitoneal bladder ruptures in a patient with blunt trauma: Use of the bladder suspension method.

Publications

Laparoscopic repair of combined extra- and intraperitoneal bladder ruptures in a patient with blunt trauma: Use of the bladder suspension method.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets