Dataset Information

Obesity and Cancer Risk in White and Black Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Anthropometric measures of obesity, including BMI and waist circumference (WC), do not quantify excess adiposity and metabolic abnormalities consistently across racial populations. This study tested the hypothesis that participant race modifies the association of anthropometric measures of obesity and cancer risk.

Methods

This prospective cohort (The Pennington Center Longitudinal Study) included 18,296 adults, 6,405 (35.0%) male sex and 6,273 (34.3%) Black race. The primary exposures were BMI (weight in kilograms/height in meters squared) and WC (centimeters). The primary end point was the time from study enrollment to diagnosis of histologically confirmed invasive cancer.

Results

During a median follow-up of 14.0 years (interquartile range: 9.8-19.0 years), invasive cancer occurred in 1,350 participants. Among men, race modified the association of BMI (P_interaction = 0.02) and WC (P_interaction = 0.01) with cancer incidence; compared with a BMI of 22 kg/m² , a BMI of 35 kg/m² in White men was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.83 (95% CI: 1.58-2.12), whereas in Black men, the hazard ratio was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.72-1.11). Among women, race did not modify the association of BMI (P_interaction = 0.41) or WC (P_interaction = 0.36) with cancer incidence.

Conclusions

In this diverse cohort of adults, participant race and sex modified the prognostic associations of anthropometric measures of obesity and cancer risk.

SUBMITTER: Brown JC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8422242 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Obesity and Cancer Risk in White and Black Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Brown Justin C JC Yang Shengping S Mire Emily F EF Wu Xiaocheng X Miele Lucio L Ochoa Augusto A Zabaleta Jovanny J Katzmarzyk Peter T PT

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) 20210601 6

<h4>Objective</h4>Anthropometric measures of obesity, including BMI and waist circumference (WC), do not quantify excess adiposity and metabolic abnormalities consistently across racial populations. This study tested the hypothesis that participant race modifies the association of anthropometric measures of obesity and cancer risk.<h4>Methods</h4>This prospective cohort (The Pennington Center Longitudinal Study) included 18,296 adults, 6,405 (35.0%) male sex and 6,273 (34.3%) Black race. The pri ...[more]

PMID: 34029447

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOur knowledge of the effect of potentially modifiable risks factors on people developing dementia is mostly from European origin populations. We aimed to explore if these risk factors had similar effects in United Kingdom (UK) White, South Asian and Black UK Biobank participants recruited from 2006-2010 and followed up until 2020.MethodsWe reviewed the literature to 25.09.2020 for meta-analyses identifying potentially modifiable risk factors preceding dementia diagnosis by ≥10 years. We calculated prevalence of each identified risk factor and association with dementia for participants aged ≥55 at registration in UK Biobank. We calculated hazard ratios using Cox regression for each risk factor, stratified by ethnic group, and tested for differences using interaction effects between each risk factor and ethnicity.FindingsWe included education, hearing loss, hypertension, obesity, excess alcohol consumption, physical inactivity, smoking, high total cholesterol, depression, diabetes, social isolation, and air pollution as risks. Out of 294,162 participants, there were 287,806 White, 3590 South Asian and 2766 Black people, followed up for up to 14.8 years, with a total follow-up time of 3,392,095 years. During follow-up, 5,972 people (2.03%) developed dementia. Risk of dementia was higher in Black participants than White participants (HR for dementia compared to White participants as reference 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.77, p = 0.001) but South Asians had a similar risk. Association between each risk factor and dementia was similar in each ethnic group with no evidence to support any differences.InterpretationWe find that Black participants were more likely to develop dementia than White participants, but South Asians were not. Identified risk factors in White European origin participants had a similar effect in Black and South Asian origin participants. Volunteers in UK Biobank are not representative of the population and interaction effects were underpowered so further work is needed.

Project description:Identification of blood biomarkers that prospectively predict progression of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection to tuberculosis disease might lead to interventions that combat the tuberculosis epidemic. We aimed to assess whether global gene expression measured in whole blood of healthy people allowed identification of prospective signatures of risk of active tuberculosis disease. RESULTS:Between July 6, 2005, and April 23, 2007, we enrolled 6363 from the ACS study and 4466 from independent South African and Gambian cohorts. 46 progressors and 107 matched controls were identified in the ACS cohort. A 16 gene signature of risk was identified. The signature predicted tuberculosis progression with a sensitivity of 66Â·1% (95% CI 63Â·2â68Â·9) and a specificity of 80Â·6% (79Â·2â82Â·0) in the 12 months preceding tuberculosis diagnosis. The risk signature was validated in an untouched group of adolescents (p=0Â·018 for RNA sequencing and p=0Â·0095 for qRT-PCR) and in the independent South African and Gambian cohorts (p values <0Â·0001 by qRT-PCR) with a sensitivity of 53Â·7% (42Â·6â64Â·3) and a specificity of 82Â·8% (76Â·7â86) in 12 months preceding tuberculosis. Interpretation: The whole blood tuberculosis risk signature prospectively identified people at risk of developing active tuberculosis, opening the possibility for targeted intervention to prevent the disease. In this prospective cohort study, we followed up healthy, South African adolescents aged 12â18 years from the adolescent cohort study (ACS) who were infected with M tuberculosis for 2 years. We collected blood samples from study participants every 6 months and monitored the adolescents for progression to tuberculosis disease. A prospective signature of risk was derived from whole blood RNA sequencing data by comparing participants who developed active tuberculosis disease (progressors) with those who remained healthy (matched controls). After adaptation to multiplex qRT-PCR, the signature was used to predict tuberculosis disease in untouched adolescent samples and in samples from independent cohorts of South African and Gambian adult progressors and controls. Participants of the independent cohorts were household contacts of adults with active pulmonary tuberculosis disease.

Project description:BackgroundThyroid cancer incidence has increased worldwide. Obesity trends may play a role, but the underlying biological pathways are not well-characterized. Therefore, we examined associations of excess adiposity and obesity-related metabolic conditions with thyroid cancer incidence.MethodsFrom the Sister Study, a cohort of sisters of women with breast cancer, we included 47,739 women who were cancer-free at baseline (2003-2009). Height, weight, waist and hip circumference, and blood pressure were measured at baseline and medical history was self-reported. Cox proportional hazards regression models were adjusted for age (time scale), race/ethnicity, smoking, baseline history of benign thyroid disease, and frequency of routine healthcare visits.FindingsDuring follow-up (median = 12.5; max = 15.9 years), 259 women reported incident thyroid cancer. Body mass index (BMI) (hazard ratio [HR]per-5 kg/m2 = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.14-1.37), waist circumference (HRper-5 cm increase = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06-1.15), and waist-to-hip ratio (HR ≥0.85-versus-<0.85 = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.14-1.94) were positively associated with thyroid cancer incidence, as were metabolic syndrome (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.24-2.25), dyslipidemia (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.13-1.90), borderline diabetes (HR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.15-3.69), hypertension (HR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.12-1.96), and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS, HR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.20-3.67). These associations were attenuated with additional BMI adjustment, although dyslipidemia (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.04-1.75) and PCOS (HR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.06-3.28) remained associated with thyroid cancer incidence. Hypothyroidism was not associated with thyroid cancer.InterpretationIn this cohort of sisters of women diagnosed with breast cancer, excess adiposity and several obesity-related metabolic conditions were associated with thyroid cancer incidence. These findings provide insights into potential biological mechanisms linking obesity and thyroid cancer.FundingThis research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Z01-ES044005).

Project description:BackgroundObesity is as an important risk factor for chronic diseases. Metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) is considered a benign state. The association between metabolic health and obesity categories and cancer risk remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between metabolic health status combined with obesity phenotypes and the risk of cancer.MethodsData from 91,834 participants in the Kailuan cohort were analyzed, excluding individuals with a body mass index (BMI) < 18.5 kg/m² and those with a history of cancer. Obesity phenotypes were classified based on BMI and waist circumference (WC) combined with metabolic health status, resulting in six phenotypes. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to assess the association between metabolic health and obesity phenotypes with cancer risk and all-cause mortality.ResultsThe prevalence of metabolically healthy obesity and metabolically unhealthy obesity defined by BMI was 6.86% and 12.18%, while that defined by WC was 20.79% and 25.76%, respectively. Compared to metabolically healthy participants, individuals with an unhealthy metabolic status had a significantly higher risk of cancer (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.15; p=0.004). The hazard ratios for cancer were 1.19, 1.23, 1.20, and 1.55 for individuals with one, two, three, and four metabolic disorders, respectively. Among those classified as metabolically unhealthy, both overweight and obesity were associated with a protective effect on cancer risk (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; p=0.006 for overweight; HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97; p=0.010 for obesity). However, abdominal obesity significantly increased cancer risk in both metabolically healthy and unhealthy participants. In subgroup analysis, simple obesity showed a protective trend against cancer in those with respiratory cancers, while abdominal obesity consistently posed a risk for various cancer types.ConclusionMetabolically unhealthy status and abdominal obesity are risk factors for cancer and all-cause mortality, whereas simple obesity offers protective effects against cancer and all-cause mortality in metabolically unhealthy individuals. These findings suggest that maintaining metabolic health and reducing the metabolic risks associated with abdominal obesity should be key targets for cancer prevention.

Dataset Information

Obesity and Cancer Risk in White and Black Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Obesity and Cancer Risk in White and Black Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets