Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of four different primary screening strategies: high-risk factor questionnaire (HRFQ) alone, single immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT), double iFOBT and HRFQ+double iFOBT for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening compared with no screening using the Markov model.Methods
Treeage Pro V.2011 software was used to simulate the Markov model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which was compared with the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, was used to reflect the cost-effectiveness of the CRC screening method. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used for parameter uncertainty.Results
All strategies had greater effectiveness because they had more quality-adjusted life years (Q
SUBMITTER: Zhou Q
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8422490 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature