Aiding shared decision making in lung cancer screening: two decision tools.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Shared decision making (SDM) preceding lung cancer screening is important for populations that are underrepresented in lung cancer screening trials. Current evidence-based guidelines; however, do not address personal risk and outcomes in underrepresented populations. This study compared two SDM decision aids (Option Grids and Shouldiscreen.com) for SDM efficacy, decision regret and knowledge.

Methods

We conducted a prospective trial of lung cancer screening patients (N = 237) randomized to SDM with Option Grids or Shouldiscreen.com. To evaluate the SDM process after lung cancer screening, patients answered two questionnaires: CollaboRATE and Decision Regret. Patients also completed a questionnaire to test their knowledge of lung cancer screening.

Results

Pa

SUBMITTER: Sferra SR 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8458019 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature