Dataset Information

Instrumentation for Routine Analysis of Acrylamide in French Fries: Assessing Limitations for Adoption.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this experimental review was to detect acrylamide in French fries using methods most adaptable to the food process industry for quality control assessment of products. French fries were prepared at different cook times using the same fryer oil over a five-day period to assess the influence of oil degradation and monitor trends in acrylamide formation. Acrylamide detection was performed using LC-MS, GC-MS and FT-NIR. The low levels of acrylamide produced during frying, low molecular weight of the analyte, and complexity of the potato matrix make routine acrylamide measurement challenging in a well-outfitted analytical lab with trained personnel. The findings of this study are presented from the perspective of pros and cons of each acrylamide measurement method in enough detail for food processors to appraise the method that may work best for them based on their available instrumentation and extent of personnel training.

SUBMITTER: Skinner MM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8469642 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Instrumentation for Routine Analysis of Acrylamide in French Fries: Assessing Limitations for Adoption.

Skinner Mark M MM Seale Jared T JT Cantrell Maranda S MS Collins Joseph M JM Turner Matthew W MW McDougal Owen M OM

Foods (Basel, Switzerland) 20210830 9

The purpose of this experimental review was to detect acrylamide in French fries using methods most adaptable to the food process industry for quality control assessment of products. French fries were prepared at different cook times using the same fryer oil over a five-day period to assess the influence of oil degradation and monitor trends in acrylamide formation. Acrylamide detection was performed using LC-MS, GC-MS and FT-NIR. The low levels of acrylamide produced during frying, low molecula ...[more]

PMID: 34574148

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Today there is much debate about why telemedicine has stalled. Teleradiology is the only widespread telemedicine application. Other telemedicine applications appear to be promising candidates for widespread use, but they remain in the early adoption stage. The objective of this debate paper is to achieve a better understanding of the adoption of telemedicine, to assist those trying to move applications from pilot stage to routine delivery. DISCUSSION: We have investigated the reasons why telemedicine has stalled by focusing on two, high-level topics: 1) the process of adoption of telemedicine in comparison with other technologies; and 2) the factors involved in the widespread adoption of telemedicine. For each topic, we have formulated hypotheses. First, the advantages for users are the crucial determinant of the speed of adoption of technology in healthcare. Second, the adoption of telemedicine is similar to that of other health technologies and follows an S-shaped logistic growth curve. Third, evidence of cost-effectiveness is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the widespread adoption of telemedicine. Fourth, personal incentives for the health professionals involved in service provision are needed before the widespread adoption of telemedicine will occur. SUMMARY: The widespread adoption of telemedicine is a major -- and still underdeveloped -- challenge that needs to be strengthened through new research directions. We have formulated four hypotheses, which are all susceptible to experimental verification. In particular, we believe that data about the adoption of telemedicine should be collected from applications implemented on a large-scale, to test the assumption that the adoption of telemedicine follows an S-shaped growth curve. This will lead to a better understanding of the process, which will in turn accelerate the adoption of new telemedicine applications in future. Research is also required to identify suitable financial and professional incentives for potential telemedicine users and understand their importance for widespread adoption.

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the limitations of the existing physician directory in measuring electronic health record adoption rates among a cohort of Connecticut physicians.DesignA population-based mailing assessed the number of physicians practising in Connecticut.MeasurementsInformation about practice site, practises pertaining to storing of patient information, sources of revenue and preferred method for receiving survey. Practice status in Connecticut, measured by yes and no. Demographic information was collected on gender, year of birth, race and ethnicity.ResultsThe response rate for the postcard mailing was 19% (3105/16 462). Of the 16 462 unduplicated consumers, 233 (1%) were retired and 5828 (35%) did not practise in Connecticut. Of the 3105 valid postcard responses we received, 2159 were for physicians practising in Connecticut. Nine (0.4%) of these responses did not specify a preferred method for receiving the full physician survey; 91 physicians refused to participate in the survey; 2159 surveys were sent out using each physician's requested method for receiving the survey, that is, web-based, regular mail or telephone. As of August 2012, 898 physicians had returned surveys, resulting in a response rate of 42%.LimitationsThe postcard response rate based on the unduplicated lists adjusted for exclusions, such as death, retired and do not practise in Connecticut, is 30%, which is low. We may be missing physicians' population which could greatly affect the indicators being used to measure change in electronic health record adoption rates.ConclusionsIt is difficult to obtain an accurate physician count of practising physicians in Connecticut from the existing lists. States that are participating in the projects funded under various Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) initiatives must focus on getting an accurate count of the physicians practising in their state, since their progress is being measured based on this key number.

Project description:PurposeThis study assessed the accuracy and early clinical outcomes of the VELYS™ Robotic-Assisted solution for total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsA multicenter, prospective non-randomized 1:1 cohort study was conducted at five sites. Subjects underwent TKA with either manual instrumentation or with robotic-assistance (RA). RA procedures were the first conducted at each site, therefore, representing the adoption phase for each surgeon. Mechanical alignment was targeted in the manual arm, while the target and technique varied in the RA arm. The primary objective was a non-inferiority (NI) analysis of the accuracy of the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) for RA versus manual, with a 1.5° NI margin. The accuracy of the mechanical medial distal femoral angle (mMDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) tibial posterior slope (TPS) angles were measured. Adverse events (AEs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at 12 weeks and 1 year.ResultsOne hundred participants were recruited for both manual and RA groups, the mean preoperative demographics and PROM scores were similar. The primary endpoint NI analysis was successful (p < 0.0001). The RA group demonstrated improved alignment accuracy of the femoral and tibial components compared to manual (mMDFA 1.3 vs. 1.9, p = 0.0026, mMPTA 1.2 vs. 1.5, p = 0.026, TPS 1.7 vs. 2.8, p < 0.0001). Serious AEs occurred in fewer RA subjects than in the manual (6 vs. 16, p = 0.040). Mean PROMs at 12 weeks and 1 year in the RA group compared to manual were either equivalent or improved (Forgotten Joint Score and pain at 12 weeks).ConclusionsThis study found that the RA system can be safely adopted without adversely impacting the long leg alignment or increasing the risk of complications. Further, it was observed that the accuracy of the femoral and tibial component positioning was improved, and there were positive trends in the rate of serious AEs and some PROMs at early follow-up.Level of evidenceLevel II.

Dataset Information

Instrumentation for Routine Analysis of Acrylamide in French Fries: Assessing Limitations for Adoption.

Publications

Instrumentation for Routine Analysis of Acrylamide in French Fries: Assessing Limitations for Adoption.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets