Is Novelty Detection Important in Long-Term Odor Memory?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Memory for odors is believed to be longer-lasting than memory for visual stimuli, as is evidenced by flat forgetting curves. However, performance on memory tasks is typically weaker in olfaction than vision. Studies of odor memory that use forced-choice methods confound responses that are a result of a trace memory and responses that can be obtained through process of elimination. Moreover, odor memory is typically measured with common stimuli, which are more familiar and responses may be confounded by verbal memory, and measure memory in intentional learning conditions, which are ecologically questionable. Here we demonstrate the value of using tests of memory in which hit rate and correct rejection rate are evaluated separately (i.e., not using forced-choice methods) and uncommon stimuli
SUBMITTER: Cameron EL
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8470488 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA