The landscape of m6A regulators in small cell lung cancer: molecular characteristics, immuno-oncology features, and clinical relevance.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhang C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8474928 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
The landscape of m<sup>6</sup>A regulators in small cell lung cancer: molecular characteristics, immuno-oncology features, and clinical relevance.
Zhang Chaoqi C Zhang Zhihui Z Zhang Zhen Z Luo Yuejun Y Wu Peng P Zhang Guochao G Xue Liyan L Zeng Qingpeng Q Wang Lide L Yang Zhaoyang Z Zeng Hua H Zheng Bo B Tan Fengwei F Xue Qi Q Gao Shugeng S Sun Nan N He Jie J
Molecular cancer 20210927 1
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundSquamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) are the two main pathological types of esophageal cancer (EC), which differ in molecular features, genetic variation, and treatment sensitivity. However, as a key process in tumorigenesis and development, the role of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) regulators in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is not fully understood.MethodsThis study systematically compared the role of m6A regulators of ESCC and EAC in terms of molecular characteristics, immuno-oncology characteristics, and clinical relevance, and validated our findings in a long-term follow-up patient cohort.ResultsThere were many differences in m6A regulators between ESCC and EAC in terms of expression patterns, genetic variation, association with tumor pathways, immune signatures, and immunotherapy sensitivity. Furthermore, VIRMA was identified as a factor with opposite functional and prognostic effects in ESCC and EAC. ESCC patients with high VIRMA expression and EAC patients with low VIRMA expression had a better prognosis. Single-center data showed that low expression of FTO may be associated with superior immunotherapy efficacy in ESCC patients.ConclusionsThe results herein provide novel ideas for understanding the tumor characteristics, occurrence, and development of ESCC and EAC, and suggest new targets for the treatment and intervention of EC.
| S-EPMC9843396 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Membrane-associated RING-CH8 (MARCH8) is a member of the recently discovered MARCH family of ubiquitin ligases. MARCH8 has been shown to participate in immune responses. However, the role of MARCH8 in prognosis and immunology in human cancers remains largely unknown. The expression of MARCH8 protein was detected via immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and non-cancerous lung tissues. The study investigated the role of MARCH8 in tumor immunity through pan-cancer analysis of multiple databases. MARCH8 genetic alternations and expression were explored with the cBioPortal, GTEx, and TCGA databases. We investigated the role of MARCH8 expression in clinical relevance, prognosis, tumor immune microenvironment, immune checkpoint (ICP) with a series of bioinformatics tools and methods, such as TISIDB database, ESTIMATE, and CIBERSORT method. MARCH8 expression showed cancer-specific dysregulation and was associated with the prognosis of patients in various cancers. MARCH8 was related to the tumor microenvironment and participated in tumor immune regulation. Furthermore, low expression of MARCH8 was associated with poor prognosis and might serve as an independent prognostic biomarker for NSCLC patients. The comprehensive pan-cancer analysis revealed the potential of MARCH8 in tumor-targeted therapy, and suggested MARCH8 as a promising prognostic and immunological pan-cancer biomarker.
| S-EPMC11784653 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Lung cancer is the most common cancer and leading cause of cancer death. While targeted therapies have redefined treatment options for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with genetic aberrations such as epidermal growth factor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase, many patients do not harbour these oncogenic drivers. Cancer immunology has enabled the development of immune modulators that has dramatically altered the therapeutic landscape of advanced NSCLC. The success of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in pretreated NSCLC has led to the conduct of multiple studies exploring their role in the first-line setting. This article provides an overview of the evolving landscape of immune-checkpoint inhibitors with a focus on the programmed cell-death 1 (PD-1; pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and programmed cell-death ligand 1 (PD-L1; atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab) immune-checkpoint inhibitors as single agent or in combination with either chemotherapy or with another immune-checkpoint inhibitor in the treatment of NSCLC, the challenges faced, as well as future perspectives.
| S-EPMC6716180 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Recently, immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has emerged as a powerful treatment option for advanced lung cancer. The relative success of programmed death 1 (PD-1) and/or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies in metastatic disease have increased interest in expanding their use to earlier stage NSCLC. The complex and diverse nature of stage III disease also invites the incorporation of immunotherapy into treatment plans in both the neoadjuvant and consolidation settings. Currently available data of anti-PD-(L)1 therapies in stage III NSCLC are limited. However, interim results from two studies are encouraging: a phase II neoadjuvant nivolumab trial demonstrated early signals of efficacy, and the phase III PACIFIC trial of durvalumab recently showed significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS). Preliminary results for the phase II DETERRED trial of durvalumab have also been reported. Many studies are testing anti-PD-(L)1 therapies in the neoadjuvant and consolidation settings for stage III NSCLC, and will be discussed. As these studies mature they may provide further treatment options in management of stage III NSCLC.
| S-EPMC5861269 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10938088 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Immuno-oncology therapies have the potential to revolutionize the armamentarium of available cancer treatments. To further improve clinical response rates, researchers are looking for novel combination regimens, with checkpoint blockade being used as a backbone of the treatment. This Review highlights the significance of small molecules in this approach, which holds promise to provide increased benefit to cancer patients.
| S-EPMC5900885 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposePromising single-agent activity from sotorasib and adagrasib in KRASG12C-mutant tumors has provided clinical evidence of effective KRAS signaling inhibition. However, comprehensive analysis of KRAS-variant prevalence, genomic alterations, and the relationship between KRAS and immuno-oncology biomarkers is lacking.Materials and methodsRetrospective analysis of deidentified records from 79,004 patients with various cancers who underwent next-generation sequencing was performed. Fisher's exact test evaluated the association between cancer subtypes and KRAS variants. Logistic regression assessed KRASG12C comutations with other oncogenes and the association between KRAS variants and immuno-oncology biomarkers.ResultsOf the 79,004 samples assessed, 13,758 (17.4%) harbored KRAS mutations, with 1,632 (11.9%) harboring KRASG12C and 12,126 (88.1%) harboring other KRAS variants (KRASnon-G12C). Compared with KRASnon-G12C across all tumor subtypes, KRASG12C was more prevalent in females (56% v 51%, false discovery rate-adjusted P value [FDR-P] = .0006), current or prior smokers (85% v 56%, FDR-P < .0001), and patients age > 60 years (73% v 63%, FDR-P ≤ .0001). The most frequent KRAS variants across all subtypes were G12D (29.5%), G12V (23.0%), G12C (11.9%), G13D (6.5%), and G12R (6.2%). KRASG12C was most prevalent in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (9%), appendiceal (3.9%), colorectal (3.2%), tumor of unknown origin (1.6%), small bowel (1.43%), and pancreatic (1.3%) cancers. Compared with KRASnon-G12C-mutated, KRASG12C-mutated tumors were significantly associated with tumor mutational burden-high status (17.9% v 8.4%, odds ratio [OR] = 2.38; FDR-P < .0001). KRASG12C-mutated tumors exhibited a distinct comutation profile from KRASnon-G12C-mutated tumors, including higher comutations of STK11 (20.59% v 5.95%, OR = 4.10; FDR-P < .01) and KEAP1 (15.38% v 4.61%, OR = 3.76; FDR-P < .01).ConclusionThis study presents the first large-scale, pan-cancer genomic characterization of KRASG12C. The KRASG12C mutation was more prevalent in females and older patients and appeared to be associated with smoking status. KRASG12C tumors exhibited a distinct comutation profile and were associated with tumor mutational burden-high status.
| S-EPMC8966967 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Systemic therapy is an essential part of treatment for all patients with small-cell lung cancer (sclc) and for most patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc). Standards of care have evolved dramatically since 2009, especially in the setting of incurable or advanced nsclc. Part of that evolution has been the incorporation of immuno-oncology drugs, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (icis) into multiple therapeutic scenarios. In the present review, we discuss the role of the immune system in lung cancer and the previous failures of immunotherapy for patients with lung cancer. We then provide an overview of the existing evidence for the use of icis in patients with advanced nsclc that is either treatment-naïve or pretreated, for consolidative treatment after chemoradiotherapy in stage iii nsclc, and for palliative therapy in patients with sclc. Finally, we discuss duration of treatment, special populations, and the future of immuno-oncology for patients with lung cancer. Overall, we provide an evidence-based snapshot of immuno-oncology agents in the treatment of lung cancer up to early 2019.
| S-EPMC7194003 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Bone is among the main sites of metastasis in breast, prostate and other major cancers. Bone metastases remain incurable causing high mortality, severe skeletal-related effects and decreased quality of life. Despite the success of immunotherapies in oncology, no immunotherapies are approved for bone metastasis and no clear benefit has been observed with approved immunotherapies in treatment of bone metastatic disease. Therefore, it is crucial to consider unique features of tumor microenvironment in bone metastasis when developing novel therapies. The vicious cycle of bone metastasis, referring to crosstalk between tumor and bone cells that enables the tumor cells to grow in the bone microenvironment, is a well-established concept. Very recently, a novel osteoimmuno-oncology (OIO) concept was introduced to the scientific community. OIO emphasizes the significance of interactions between tumor, immune and bone cells in promoting tumor growth in bone metastasis, and it can be used to reveal the most promising targets for bone metastasis. In order to provide an insight into the current immuno-oncology drug development landscape, we used 1stOncology database, a cancer drug development resource to identify novel immunotherapies in preclinical or clinical development for breast and prostate cancer bone metastasis. Based on the database search, 24 immunotherapies were identified in preclinical or clinical development that included evaluation of effects on bone metastasis. This review provides an insight to novel immuno-oncology drug development in the context of bone metastasis. Bone metastases can be approached using different modalities, and tumor microenvironment in bone provides many potential targets for bone metastasis. Noting current increasing interest in the field of OIO, more therapeutic opportunities that primarily target bone metastasis are expected in the future.
| S-EPMC10355372 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This cross-sectional and longitudinal descriptive analysis aimed to track the evolving landscape of global immuno-oncology (IO) trials and provide insight into the resolution of IO-related controversies. Clinical trials (n = 4510) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in 2007 to 2019 studying immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), adoptive cell transfer (ACT), cancer vaccines and immune modulators were included. Most of IO trials are Phase 2 and focus on ICIs and multiple IO therapies. The United States leads global IO research, with stable growth and the best methodological quality. Mainland China ranks first in the number of ACT trials but has the lowest article publication rate (6.2%). A multiple-arm comparative design is often adopted in multiple IO therapies trials (44.0%). Trials studying ICIs and multiple IO therapies are likely to use early registration (80.0% and 86.6%) and stringent corticosteroid-/infection-related criteria. Hospitals have provided the most extensive and strongest support for all IO categories. Big pharma prefers to fund Phase 3-4 ICI trials (6.98%), while small pharma has a wider sponsorship favoring Phase 1-2 trials. The "partial-use-of-corticosteroids" strategy is generally well accepted in ICI trials with a definitive trend (32.5%; P < .001) but is associated with the poor dissemination of results (P ≤ .020), while the complete disclosure and standardization of dose/timing limits are still lacking. Disparities in design features and dissemination of results are widespread in IO trials and are modulated by IO category, cancer type and sponsor. We propose policy reforms to redefine the timely publication of IO trials and standardize the resolution of corticosteroid-/infection-related issues.
| S-EPMC8248025 | biostudies-literature