Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using a New Multi-joint Articulating Instrument.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Jin HY
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8484226 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using a New Multi-joint Articulating Instrument.
Jin Hyeong Yong HY Lee Chul Seung CS Lee Yoon Suk YS
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 20210519 9
Similar Datasets
Project description:Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision is the preferred approach for treating transverse colon cancer. Due to the anatomical complexity, mobilization and resection of the transverse colon can be technically challenging. This video demonstrates laparoscopic transverse colectomy using an articulating laparoscopic instrument for a 76-year-old female patient diagnosed with T-colon cancer.
| S-EPMC8965995 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy has been developed in two tracts of robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. Laparoscopic approach remains a frequently performed surgical method that accounts for a significant portion of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, biliary and pancreatic reconstruction stages are still demanding procedures because of the inherent limitations of conventional laparoscopic instruments. Therefore, recently developed articulating laparoscopic instruments have greater dexterity similar to robotic instruments seem to be able to compensate for the weak points of conventional laparoscopic instruments. In this article, we demonstrate the hepaticojejunostomy and duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy technique using the new articulating laparoscopic instrument.
| S-EPMC9763488 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7884364 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) was firstly introduced in 1998 and has been suggested potential advantages including better cosmetic outcome, less post-operative pain and avoidance of possible haemorrhagic complications from injuring epigastric vessels. However, single-port laparoscopic approach using conventional straight instruments may lead to internal and external conflicts and ergonomic discomfort, and new laparoscopic articulating instruments were developed to overcome these limitations of straight instruments. The ArtiSential® (LIVSMED Inc., Republic of Korea) is an 8-mm diameter pistol-handle instrument that has complete articulating function like human wrist and intuitive controllability. We present a technical report of SPLA for perforated appendicitis using ArtiSential® wristed articulated instrument. A 78-year-old female with a body mass index of 23.5 was referred to our emergency room with right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography scan showed a distended tubular structure in the right lower quadrant (1.2 cm in diameter) with periappendiceal fluid collection. The patient's clinical presentation was highly indicative of perforated acute appendicitis. We performed SPLA with ArtiSential® grasper with the left hand, and this instrument helped us to allow greater manoeuvrability and dexterity with double triangulation technique. The total operation time was 40 min, and the patient was discharged without complications on the 1st day after surgery.
| S-EPMC10034796 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionIpsilateral left-sided-approach laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal herniorrhaphy (LA-TAPP) is a procedure used for inguinal hernia. However, conventional laparoscopic instruments may limit the operator's ability to approach certain areas during the procedure. This study aims to assess the feasibility of using an articulating bipolar grasper (ArtiSential®).Material and methodsBetween January 2017 and May 2022, 184 patients with inguinal hernia underwent LA-TAPP and were divided into an articulating group (AG) and a conventional group (CG). The two groups were compared for clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and recurrence rates. Learning curve analysis was also performed using the CUSUM score.ResultsThe AG and CG included 72 and 112 patients, respectively. Both groups had similar age, sex, BMI, hernia location, and hernia type. The AG had a significantly shorter operation time (59.2 ± 29.4 vs. 77.8 ± 22.4 min, p < 0.001) than the CG. The duration of hospitalization was slightly shorter in the AG (2.2 ± 0.5 vs. 2.5 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.056). Postoperative complications were lower in the AG (5.6%) than in the CG (9.8%). Scrotal neuralgic pain was observed in 1.4% of patients in the AG and 3.6% of patients in the CG. Learning curve analysis revealed that 24 cases were needed to overcome the learning curve for using an articulating device.ConclusionIP-TAPP with an articulating instrument is a safe and efficient procedure. The operation time can be reduced by improving the surgeon's procedural autonomy and reducing collisions between the instruments and the patient's ribs.
| S-EPMC10794576 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeAs the number of gastric cancer survivors is increasing and their quality of life after surgery is being emphasized, single-port surgery is emerging as an alternative to conventional gastrectomy. A novel multi-degree-of-freedom (DOF) articulating device, the ArtiSential® device (LivsMed, Seongnam, Korea), was designed to allow more intuitive and meticulous control for surgeons facing ergonomic difficulties with conventional tools. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of this new device during single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SP-LDG) for early gastric cancer (EGC) patients.Materials and methodsConsecutive patients diagnosed with EGC who underwent SP-LDG with ArtiSential® (LivsMed) graspers between April 2018 and August 2020 were enrolled in the study. The clinical outcomes were compared with those of a control group, in which prebent graspers (Olympus Medical Systems Corp) were used for the same procedures.ResultsSeventeen patients were enrolled in the ArtiSential® group. There was no significant difference in operative time (205.4±6.0 vs. 218.1±9.9 minutes, P= 0.270) or the quality of surgery, in terms of the number of retrieved lymph nodes (49.5±3.5 vs. 45.9±4.0, P=0.473), length of hospital stay (15.4±2.0 vs. 12.4±1.3 days, P=0.588), and postoperative complications (40.0% vs. 41.2%, P=0.595), between the ArtiSential® group and the control group.ConclusionsThe new multi-DOF articulating grasper is feasible and can be used as an alternative for prebent graspers during SP-LDG.
| S-EPMC8020002 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8497294 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOvarian cysts, common in women of reproductive age, often require surgical intervention, with minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery becoming the preferred method due to its reduced complications and faster recovery. Despite its benefits, challenges such as instrument collisions and operational difficulties limit the use of single- or two-port approaches. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic adnexa surgery using an articulating laparoscopic instrument, which offers flexible and ergonomic movements similar to robotic systems.MethodsThis multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in South Korea and Taiwan. The electronic medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic adnexectomy using the articulating laparoscopic instrument (ArtiSential®, LIVSMED Inc., Seongnam-si, South Korea) between October 2022 and September 2023 were analyzed. Data on patient demographics, operative and pathologic data were collected prospectively.ResultsA total of 66 patients underwent laparoscopic adnexal surgery using the articulating instrument. The median age of the patients was 43 (range, 23-76) years, and the median body mass index (BMI) was 22.5 (range, 17.1-43.4) kg/m2. Thirty-five (53.0%) patients underwent oophorectomy or salpingectomy, while 31 (47.0%) underwent cystectomy of the ovary or fallopian tube. The final pathology after surgery was benign in 61 patients (92.4%), borderline in 3 patients (4.5%), and malignant in 2 patients (3.0%). During surgery, pelvic adhesions were found in 13 patients (19.7%) and adhesiolysis was performed. The median total operation time was 53.5 (range, 26-174) minutes, and median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 50 (range, 10-200) mL. Median length of hospital stay was 1 (range, 0-3) days. Only two patients experienced a postoperative complication, which was trocar site wound dehiscence in both cases.ConclusionsThe results of this study demonstrated the feasibility of using the articulating laparoscopic instrument during laparoscopic adnexectomy.
| S-EPMC11247574 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeWe evaluated the performance of a new multi-degree-of-freedom articulating laparoscopic instrument, ArtiSential, and compared it with that of a straight-shaped instrument and the da Vinci surgical system, in renal surgery using porcine model.Materials and methodsNine female Yorkshire pigs were equally divided into three groups. The three groups were compared at each surgical step in terms of objective and subjective parameters.ResultsThe median operative times for renal pedicle clamping and ureter dissection were significantly shorter in ArtiSential group than robotic group (1.3 min vs. 4.7 min, p=0.002; 8.1 min vs. 11.1 min, p=0.015). The median operative time for bladder repair was significantly longer in ArtiSential group than robotic and straight-shaped groups (17.9 min vs. 5.5 min, p=0.002; 17.9 min vs. 9.3 min, p=0.026). There were no significant differences among groups in terms of blood loss or intraoperative complications. ArtiSential device was less useable for renorrhaphy (p=0.009) and bladder repair (p=0.002) compared to the robotic system. ArtiSential group was less accurate than robotic group in terms of tumor resection, renorrhaphy, and bladder repair. During ureter dissection, bladder cuff excision, and bladder repair, the surgeon experienced greater wrist discomfort but lesser back discomfort in ArtiSential group than robotic group.ConclusionsFor most steps, ArtiSential performed as well as robotic and straight-shaped instruments. The development of specialized surgical techniques for ArtiSential will maximize the advantages of these instruments.
| S-EPMC9834568 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMotorized articulating laparoscopic instruments (ALI) offer more degrees of freedom than conventional laparoscopic instruments (CLI). However, a difficult learning curve and complex instrument handling are still a problem of ALI. We compared the performance of new prototypes of motorized ALI with CLI in a series of standardized laparoscopic tasks performed by laparoscopic novices. Further, usability of the new ALI was assessed.MethodsA randomized cross-over study with 50 laparoscopic novices who either started with CLI and then changed to ALI (CA) or vice versa (AC) was conducted. All participants performed the European training in basic laparoscopic urological skills (E-BLUS) with each instrument in given order. Time and errors were measured for each exercise. Instrument usability was assessed.ResultsOverall, using CLI was significantly faster (CLI 4:27 min vs. ALI 4:50 min; p-value 0.005) and associated with fewer exercise failures in needle guidance (CLI 0 vs. ALI 12; p-value 0.0005) than ALI. Median amount of errors was similar for both instruments. Instrument sequence did not matter, as CA and AC showed comparable completion times. Regarding the learning effect, participants were significantly faster in the second attempt of exercises than in the first. In the needle guidance task, participants using CLI last demonstrated a significant speed improvement, whereas ALI were significantly slower in the second run. Regarding usability, CLI were preferred over ALI due to lighter weight and easier handling. Nevertheless, participants valued ALI's additional degrees of freedom.ConclusionUsing new motorized ALI in the E-BLUS examination by laparoscopic novices led to a worse performance compared to CLI. An explanation could be that participants felt overwhelmed by ALI and that ALI have an own distinct learning curve. As participants valued ALI's additional degrees of freedom, however, a future application of ALI could be for training purposes, ideally in combination with CLI.
| S-EPMC7819923 | biostudies-literature