BAP1 methylation: a prognostic marker of uveal melanoma metastasis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bakhoum MF
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8484429 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
BAP1 methylation: a prognostic marker of uveal melanoma metastasis.
Bakhoum Mathieu F MF Curtis Ellis J EJ Goldbaum Michael H MH Mischel Paul S PS
NPJ precision oncology 20210930 1
Uveal melanoma, the most common intraocular primary cancer in adults, is characterized by striking variability in metastatic tendencies. BAP1 deletion in the primary tumor is associated with uveal melanoma metastasis, but it cannot always be resolved by bulk DNA sequencing of heterogeneous tumors. Here, we show that assessment of BAP1 methylation is an accurate and readily clinically actionable assay to accurately identify high-risk uveal melanoma patients. ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:AimTo determine whether BAP1 gene and protein expression associates with different prognostic parameters in uveal melanoma and whether BAP1 expression correctly identifies patients as being at risk for metastases, following enucleation of the primary tumour.MethodsThirty cases of uveal melanoma obtained by enucleation between 1999 and 2004 were analysed for a variety of prognostic markers, including histological characteristics, chromosome aberrations obtained by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis and gene expression profiling. These parameters were compared with BAP1 gene expression and BAP1 immunostaining.ResultsThe presence of monosomy of chromosome 3 as identified by the different chromosome 3 tests showed significantly increased HRs (FISH on isolated nuclei cut-off 30%: HR 11.6, p=0.002; SNP analysis: HR 20.3, p=0.004) for death due to metastasis. The gene expression profile class 2, based on the 15-gene expression profile, similarly provided a significantly increased HR for a poor outcome (HR 8.5, p=0.005). Lower BAP1 gene expression and negative BAP1 immunostaining (50% of 28 tumours were immunonegative) were both associated with these markers for prognostication: FISH cut-off 30% monosomy 3 (BAP1 gene expression: p=0.037; BAP1 immunostaining: p=0.001), SNP-monosomy 3 (BAP1 gene expression: p=0.008; BAP1 immunostaining: p=0.002) and class 2 profile (BAP1 gene expression: p<0.001; BAP1 immunostaining: p=0.001) and were themselves associated with an increased risk of death due to metastasis (BAP1 gene expression dichotomised: HR 8.7, p=0.006; BAP1 immunostaining: HR 4.0, p=0.010).ConclusionsLoss of BAP1 expression associated well with all of the methods currently used for prognostication and was itself predictive of death due to metastasis in uveal melanoma after enucleation, thereby emphasising the importance of further research on the role of BAP1 in uveal melanoma.
| S-EPMC4966163 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most commonly diagnosed primary intraocular tumor in adults. Familial UM (FUM), defined as two or more family members diagnosed with UM, is rare and estimated at less than 1% of all UM. Currently, BAP1 is the only gene known to contribute significant risk for UM. In this study we aimed to estimate the frequency of BAP1 mutation in FUM and to characterize the family and personal histories of other cancers in these families. We identified 32 families with FUM, including seven families previously reported by our group. BAP1 mutation testing was carried out by direct sequencing of the coding exons and the adjacent untranslated regions of the gene. Germline deletion and duplication analysis of BAP1 was assessed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Germline BAP1 mutations were found in 6/32 (19%) families. No deletions or duplications were identified in any of the 24 samples tested by MLPA. Combined with published studies, the frequency of BAP1 mutations was 14/64 (22%) in FUM. FUM families without BAP1 mutations have distinct family histories with high rates of prostate cancer in first- and second-degree relatives. It is likely that additional genes conferring risk for FUM exist. It is important to understand key shared features of FUM to focus future research on identifying these additional tumor predisposition syndromes. Though BAP1 should be tested first in these families, FUM families without BAP1 mutation should be explored for additional predisposition genes. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
| S-EPMC5490375 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundGermline mutations in BAP1 have been associated with BAP1-Tumor Predisposition Syndrome (BAP1-TPDS), a predisposition to multiple tumors within a family that includes uveal melanoma (UM), cutaneous melanoma, malignant mesothelioma and renal cell carcinoma. Alternatively, somatic mutations in BAP1 in UM have been associated with high risk for metastasis. In this study, we compare the risk of metastasis in UM that carry germline versus somatic BAP1 mutations and mutation-negative tumors.MethodsDNA extracted from 142 UM and matched blood samples was sequenced using Sanger or next generation sequencing to identify BAP1 gene mutations.ResultsEleven of 142 UM (8%) carried germline BAP1 mutations, 43 (30%) had somatic mutations, and 88 (62%) were mutation-negative. All BAP1 mutations identified in blood samples were also present in the matched UM. There were 52 unique mutations in 54 tumors. All were pathogenic or likely pathogenic. A comparison of tumors carrying somatic vs. germline mutations, or no mutations, showed a higher frequency of metastasis in tumors carrying somatic mutations: 74% vs. 36%, P=0.03 and 74% vs. 26% P<0.001, respectively. Tumors with a somatic mutation compared to mutation-negative had an older age of diagnosis of (61.8 vs. 52.2 years, P=0.002), and shorter time to metastasis (16 vs. 26 months, P=0.04). Kaplan-Meier analysis further showed that tumors with somatic (vs. germline) mutations demonstrated a greater metastatic risk (P=0.03). Cox multivariate analysis showed in addition to chromosome-3 monosomy and larger tumor diameter, the presence of BAP1 somatic, but not germline mutations, was significantly associated with risk of metastasis(P=0.02). Personal or family history of BAP1-TPDS was available for 79 of the cases. All eight cases with germline mutations reported a history of BAP1-TPDS, which was significantly greater than what was observed in cases with somatic mutations (10 of 23, P=0.009) or mutation-negative cases (11 of 48, P<0.001).ConclusionsDefining germline vs. somatic nature of BAP1 mutations in UM can inform the individual about both the risk of metastasis, and the time to metastasis, which are critically important outcomes for the individual. This information can also change the cascade screening and surveillance of family members.
| S-EPMC6260582 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Uveal melanoma (UM) is characterized by relatively few, highly incident molecular alterations and their association with metastatic risk is deeply understood. Nevertheless, this knowledge has so far not led to innovative therapies for the successful treatment of UM metastases or for adjuvant therapy, leaving survival after diagnosis of metastatic UM almost unaltered in decades. The driver mutations of UM, mainly in the G-protein genes GNAQ and GNA11, activate the MAP-kinase pathway as well as the YAP/TAZ pathway. At present, there are no drugs that target the latter and this likely explains the failure of mitogen activated kinase kinase inhibitors. Immune checkpoint blockers, despite the game changing effect in cutaneous melanoma (CM), show only limited effects in UM probably because of the low mutational burden of 0.5 per megabase and the unavailability of antibodies targeting the main immune checkpoint active in UM. The highly pro-tumorigenic microenvironment of UM also contributes to therapy resistance. However, T-cell redirection by a soluble T-cell receptor that is fused to an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment, local, liver specific therapy, new immune checkpoint blockers, and YAP/TAZ specific drugs give new hope to repeating the success of innovative therapy obtained for CM.
| S-EPMC8616038 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionLoss of BAP1 protein expression emerged as a negative prognostic marker in uveal melanoma (UM) and has primarily been studied in enucleations. Intraocular biopsy is frequently performed prior to UM globe-conserving therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated BAP1 immunostaining of UM in 16 biopsies and 8 subsequent enucleations, and results were correlated with the UM-specific gene expression profile (GEP; n = 11), chromosome 3 status by FISH and/or chromosomal microarray (n = 12; 9 also had GEP), and clinical outcomes.ResultsUM involved the choroid in 15 (of 16) cases. Biopsy was performed for prognostication (n = 12) or diagnosis (n = 4). Treatment included brachytherapy (n = 13; 5 followed by enucleation) or enucleation only (n = 3). BAP1 nuclear immunostaining was positive in 9, negative in 4, and equivocal in 3 biopsies. For the 3 equivocal biopsies, BAP1 immunostaining was positive in 2 (of 3) subsequent enucleations. BAP1 immunostaining was concordant between all 5 remaining biopsies and enucleations. BAP1-positive biopsies had disomy 3 (n = 6) or 3p loss (n = 1) and class 1 GEP (n = 6). BAP1-negative biopsies had monosomy 3 (n = 3) and class 2 GEP (n = 2). Median follow-up was 62.5 months (range, 17-150). For BAP1-positive UM patients, 8 were alive (7 without metastatic disease) and 3 had died (1 melanoma-related death). Among BAP1-negative UM patients, 2 were alive (1 with metastatic disease) and 3 had melanoma-related deaths.ConclusionBAP1 immunostaining in biopsies highly correlates with results in subsequent enucleations and with well-established UM prognostic markers, representing a potential additional prognostic tool for UM biopsies.
| S-EPMC8914242 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare aggressive intraocular tumour with a propensity for liver metastases, occurring in ∼50% of patients. The tumour suppressor BAP1 is considered to be key in UM progression. Herein, we present the largest study to date investigating cellular expression patterns of BAP1 protein in 165 UMs, correlating these patterns to prognosis. Full clinical, histological, genetic, and follow-up data were available for all patients. BAP1 gene sequencing was performed on a subset of 26 cases. An independent cohort of 14 UMs was examined for comparison. Loss of nuclear BAP1 (nBAP1) protein expression was observed in 54% (88/165) UMs. nBAP1 expression proved to be a significant independent prognostic parameter: it identified two subgroups within monosomy 3 (M3) UM, which are known to have a high risk of metastasis. Strikingly, nBAP1-positiveM3 UMs were associated with prolonged survival compared to nBAP1-negative M3 UMs (Log rank, p = 0.014). nBAP1 protein loss did not correlate with a BAP1 mutation in 23% (6/26) of the UMs analysed. Cytoplasmic BAP1 protein (cBAP1) expression was also observed in UM: although appearing 'predominantly diffuse' in most nBAP1-negative UM, a distinct 'focal perinuclear' expression pattern - localized immediately adjacent to the cis Golgi - was seen in 31% (18/59). These tumours tended to carry loss-of-function BAP1 mutations. Our study demonstrates loss of nBAP1 expression to be the strongest prognostic marker in UM, confirming its importance in UM progression. Our data suggest that non-genetic mechanisms account for nBAP1 loss in a small number of UMs. In addition, we describe a subset of nBAP1-negative UM, in which BAP1 is sequestered in perinuclear bodies, most likely within Golgi, warranting further mechanistic investigation.
| S-EPMC5783957 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare yet aggressive eye cancer causing over 50% mortality from metastasis. Familial UM, amounting to 1%-6% of patients in Finland and the United States, mostly lack identified genetic cause, while 8% show associations with other cancer syndromes. We searched novel genetic associations for predisposition to UM, additional to already studied BAP1 and MBD4, by using targeted amplicon sequencing of 19 genes associated with UM, BAP1, or renal cell carcinoma in 270 consecutively enrolled Finnish patients with UM. Key UM drivers GNAQ, GNA11, CYSLTR2, PLCB4, EIF1AX, and SF3B1 lacked pathogenic germline variants. One patient carried the pathogenic BRCA1 variant c.3626del p.(Leu1209*), and one harbored a novel truncating MET variant c.252C > G p.(Tyr84*), classified as likely pathogenic. FLCN and BRCA2, previously identified with pathogenic variants in patients with UM, did not have such variants in our cohort. Two patients were heterozygous for a pathogenic recessive BLM variant c.2824-2A > T. None of the carriers of identified variants had familial UM. We identified BRCA1 and MET as genes with pathogenic germline variants in Finnish UM patients, each with a frequency of 0.4% (95% confidence interval, 0-2).
| S-EPMC11681845 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Specific subvariants of uveal melanoma (UM) are associated with increased rates of metastasis compared to other subvariants. BRCA1 (BReast CAncer gene 1)-associated protein-1 (BAP1) is encoded by a gene that has been linked to aggressive behavior in UM. Methods: We evaluated BAP1 for the presence of intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs) and its protein−protein interactions (PPI). We evaluated specific sequence-based features of the BAP1 protein using a set of bioinformatic databases, predictors, and algorithms. Results: We show that BAP1’s structure contains extensive IDPRs as it is highly enriched in proline residues (the most disordered amino acid; p-value < 0.05), the average percent of predicted disordered residues (PPDR) was 57.34%, and contains 9 disorder-based binding sites (ie. molecular recognition features (MoRFs)). BAP1’s intrinsic disorder allows it to engage in a complex PPI network with at least 49 partners (p-value < 1.0 × 10−16). Conclusion: These findings show that BAP1 contains IDPRs and an intricate PPI network. Mutations in UM that are associated with the BAP1 gene may alter the function of the IDPRs embedded into its structure. These findings develop the understanding of UM and may provide a target for potential novel therapies to treat this aggressive neoplasm.
| S-EPMC9601668 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo estimate point prevalence of uveal melanoma in the patients with germline BAP1 pathogenic variant.DesignCohort study with risk assessment using Bayesian analysis.MethodsThe point prevalence estimate was obtained by Bayes's rule of reverse conditional probabilities. The probability of uveal melanoma given that BAP1 mutation exists was derived from the prevalence of uveal melanoma, prevalence of germline BAP1 pathogenic variants, and the probability of germline BAP1 pathogenic variant given that uveal melanoma is present. Confidence intervals (CIs) for each variable were calculated as the mean of Bernoulli random variables and for the risk estimate, by the delta method. The age at diagnosis and the gender of the uveal melanoma patients with BAP1 germline pathogenic variants obtained from previous publications or from authors' unpublished cohort was compared with those in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.ResultsThe point prevalence of uveal melanoma in patients with the germline BAP1 pathogenic variants in the US population was estimated to be 2.8% (95% CI, 0.88%-4.81%). In the SEER database, the median age at diagnosis of uveal melanomas was 63 (range 3-99 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 1.01:1. In comparison, uveal melanoma cases with BAP1 germline pathogenic variants from the US population (n = 27) had a median age at diagnosis of 50.5 years (range 16-71).ConclusionsQuantification of the risk of developing uveal melanoma can enhance counseling regarding surveillance in patients with germline BAP1 pathogenic variant.
| S-EPMC8059106 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genetic analyses were conducted on tumor samples from 88 patients with uveal melanoma (UM), 6 of whom carry pathogenic germline variants in BAP1. We assessed the frequency, pattern, and prognostic significance of somatic aberrations, and investigated differences between germline BAP1 variant carriers compared to sporadic cases. The frequency of the main oncogenic driver mutations was not significantly different between these groups. Patients with germline BAP1 variants did not have significantly different overall survival compared to the wildtype or somatic BAP1 mutation groups. Patients with a somatic BAP1 mutation (n = 24) had a significantly worse prognosis compared to wildtype (n = 58). All patients with stage III tumors and a somatic BAP1 mutation (n = 7) developed metastasis, however four of 28 stage I-II tumors without metastasis had somatic BAP1 mutations, with observation time >5 years. The tumor from one germline BAP1 carrier (stage IIIC) with a somatic EIF1AX splice variant, has not developed metastasis within a 22-year observation time.
| S-EPMC11460691 | biostudies-literature