Dataset Information

False Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases due to Contamination by Inactivated Virus Vaccine.

ABSTRACT: A false-positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction result can lead to unnecessary public health measures. We report 2 individuals whose respiratory specimens were contaminated by an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine strain (CoronaVac), likely at vaccination premises. Incidentally, whole genome sequencing of CoronaVac showed adaptive deletions on the spike protein, which do not result in observable changes of antigenicity.

SUBMITTER: To KK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8499976 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

False Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases due to Contamination by Inactivated Virus Vaccine.

To Kelvin Kai-Wang KK Li Xin X Lung David Christopher DC Ip Jonathan Daniel JD Chan Wan-Mui WM Chu Allen Wing-Ho AW Yip Cyril Chik-Yan CC Chen Jonathan H K JHK Poon Rosana Wing-Shan RW Tsoi Hoi-Wah HW Lai Raymond Wai-Man RW To Wing-Kin WK Ren Lili L Li Mingkun M Cao Yunlong Y Xie Xiaoliang Sunney XS Jin Dong-Yan DY Yuen Kwok-Yung KY

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 20220401 8

A false-positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction result can lead to unnecessary public health measures. We report 2 individuals whose respiratory specimens were contaminated by an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine strain (CoronaVac), likely at vaccination premises. Incidentally, whole genome sequencing of CoronaVac showed adaptive deletions on the spike protein, which do not result in observable changes of antigenicity. ...[more]

PMID: 34498683

Similar Datasets

Project description:The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic exposed weaknesses in multiple domains and widened gender-based inequalities across the world. It also stimulated extraordinary scientific achievement by bringing vaccines to the public in less than a year. In this article, we discuss the implications of current vaccination guidance for pregnant and lactating women, if their exclusion from the first wave of vaccine trials was justified, and if a change in the current vaccine development pathway is necessary. Pregnant and lactating women were not included in the initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine trials. Therefore, perhaps unsurprisingly, the first vaccine regulatory approvals have been accompanied by inconsistent advice from public health, governmental, and professional authorities around the world. Denying vaccination to women who, although pregnant or breastfeeding, are fully capable of autonomous decision making is a throwback to a paternalistic era. Conversely, lack of evidence generated in a timely manner, upon which to make an informed decision, shifts responsibility from research sponsors and regulators and places the burden of decision making upon the woman and her healthcare advisor. The World Health Organization, the Task Force on Research Specific to Pregnant Women and Lactating Women, and others have highlighted the long-standing disadvantage experienced by women in relation to the development of vaccines and medicines. It is uncertain whether there was sufficient justification for excluding pregnant and lactating women from the initial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine trials. In future, we recommend that regulators mandate plans that describe the development pathway for new vaccines and medicines that address the needs of women who are pregnant or lactating. These should incorporate, at the outset, a careful consideration of the balance of the risks of exclusion from or inclusion in initial studies, patient and public perspectives, details of "developmental and reproductive toxicity" studies, and approaches to collect data systematically from participants who are unknowingly pregnant at the time of exposure. This requires careful consideration of any previous knowledge about the mode of action of the vaccine and the likelihood of toxicity or teratogenicity. We also support the view that the default position should be a "presumption of inclusion," with exclusion of women who are pregnant or lactating only if justified on specific, not generic, grounds. Finally, we recommend closer coordination across countries with the aim of issuing consistent public health advice.

Project description:IntroductionIn China, the long-term immunogenicity and adverse effects of inactivated vaccines produced by different or the same manufacturer remain unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the cellular immune responses and neutralizing antibody kinetics of homologous and heterologous administrations of an inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine 240 days after the second vaccination.MethodsThis prospective, multicenter, observational, longitudinal study involved 595 participants with a negative SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction result who were serologically tested and followed for 8 months after vaccination. Neutralizing antibodies, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL)-6, CD4+ T-lymphocyte, and B-lymphocyte counts were evaluated in serum samples after stimulation with 2 μg/mL SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for 16 h at follow-up intervals of 2 months.ResultsMost participants [582/595; 146 male participants, 449 female participants; mean age 35 (26-50 years)] rapidly developed neutralizing antibodies after two doses of the vaccine administered 3-weeks apart. The positive rate of neutralizing antibodies peaked at 97.7% at 60-90 days, decreased, and stabilized at 82.9% at 181-240 days post-vaccination. Lower antibody concentrations were correlated with older age, longer duration after vaccination, non-health care workers, mixed-manufacturer vaccinations, and intervals of less than 40 days between two doses of vaccination, whereas lower IFN-γ levels and B-lymphocyte counts were associated with older age, blood type A, and non-health care workers. A higher IL-6 level was associated with older age, mixed-manufacturer vaccinations, intervals of less than 40 days between two doses of vaccination, and medical staff. Adverse reactions were mild or moderate and self-limited, with no serious events reported.DiscussionTwo doses of the Chinese inactivated vaccine induced robust and rapid antibody expression and cellular immune responses. Boosting vaccination is considered important, as antibodies and cellular immune responses were reduced in susceptible populations.

Dataset Information

False Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases due to Contamination by Inactivated Virus Vaccine.

Publications

False Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases due to Contamination by Inactivated Virus Vaccine.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets