Male Caregiver Barriers to HIV Index Case Testing of Untested Children.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Neary J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8500355 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Male Caregiver Barriers to HIV Index Case Testing of Untested Children.
Neary Jillian J Wagner Anjuli D AD Omondi Vincent V Otieno Verlinda V Mugo Cyrus C Wamalwa Dalton C DC Maleche-Obimbo Elizabeth E John-Stewart Grace C GC Slyker Jennifer A JA Njuguna Irene N IN
Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 20210701 3
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9298673 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAssisted index case testing, in which health care workers take an active role in referring at-risk contacts of people living with HIV for HIV testing services, has been widely recognized as an evidence-based intervention with high potential to increase PLHIV status awareness. Promising evidence for the approach has led to several attempts to scale assisted index case testing throughout eastern and southern Africa in recent years. However, despite effective implementation being at the heart of any assisted index case testing strategy, there is limited implementation science research from the perspective of the HCWs who are doing the "assisting". This study examines the feasibility of assisted index case testing from the perspective of health care workers implementing the approach in Malawi.MethodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with 26 lay health care workers delivering assisted index case testing in Malawian health facilities. Interviews explored health care workers' experiences counselling index clients and tracing these clients' contacts, aiming to inform development of a blended learning implementation package. Transcripts were inductively analyzed using Dedoose coding software to identify and describe key factors influencing feasibility of assisted index case testing. Analysis included multiple rounds of coding and iteration with the data collection team.ResultsParticipants reported a variety of barriers to feasibility of assisted index case testing implementation, including privacy concerns, limited time for assisted index case testing amid high workloads, poor quality contact information, logistical obstacles to tracing, and challenges of discussing sexual behavior with clients. Participants also reported several health care worker characteristics that facilitate feasibility: robust understanding of assisted index case testing's rationale and knowledge of procedures, strong interpersonal skills, positive attitudes towards clients, and sense of purpose in their work.ConclusionsFindings demonstrate that maximizing assisted index case testing's potential to increase HIV status awareness requires adequately equipping health care workers with appropriate knowledge, skills, and support to address and overcome the many feasibility challenges that they face in implementation.Trial registration numberNCT05343390 Date of registration: April 25, 2022.
| S-EPMC10503858 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Caregiver-assisted testing using HIV self-test (CG-HIVST) kits has been proposed to enhance paediatric HIV case finding and contribute toward ending paediatric HIV/AIDS by 2030. We conducted a systematic review to assess the risks and benefits of CG-HIVST. We searched nine electronic databases and consulted experts to identify relevant articles through 5 February, 2022. Studies comparing CG-HIVST to other testing services among children over 18-months, or to no intervention, were included. Outcomes included uptake, acceptability, diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, HIV positivity, linkage to care, social harm, values and preferences, costs, and cost-effectiveness. Risk of bias was assessed using relevant Cochrane tools and certainty of evidence was evaluated with GRADE. Among 2203 screened articles, nine observational studies from sub-Saharan Africa were included. All studies used and assessed caregiver-assisted testing using oral fluid-based HIVST. In one non-randomized intervention study of 6062 children, overall CG-HIVST uptake was lower than other standard testing services (3.30% vs. 56.71%). In the same study, HIV positivity following CG-HIVST appeared lower or comparable to standard testing (RR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.06, 3.20). Two single-arm studies reported high linkage to confirmatory testing (97.48%) and treatment initiation (97.7%) among children reported positive with CG-HIVST. Pooled positive predictive value was 36.72% across three non-randomized intervention studies. Reported social harms were rare, and acceptability appeared high among caregivers taking up the intervention, but feasibility was unclear as some reported anxiety in relation to reactive results. Evidence was appraised very low certainty. Average CG-HIVST costs varied widely and were consistently higher than standard testing services. CG-HIVST may be acceptable, but feasibility remains uncertain with potential higher costs. Current evidence favours standard testing for uptake and positivity. Low positive predictive values raise concerns about false positives and potential harm. Programmes should prioritize evidence-based approaches for paediatric case-finding, while research to fully evaluate this approach continues.
| S-EPMC11324119 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) may experience a variety of medical, behavioral, and educational concerns. The primary objective of this study was to assess barriers to health care for patients with WS, primarily using the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), and to assess whether various demographic factors are correlated with these barriers. A REDCap survey was distributed using the Williams Syndrome Association Research Registry. 319 caregivers of individuals with WS in the United States completed the BCQ. On the BCQ, lower scores indicate more barriers to care. Younger age was associated with lower scores for both the pragmatics and the skills subscales while lower income levels and increased distances to providers knowledgeable about WS were consistently associated with lower total BCQ scores.
| S-EPMC11411038 | biostudies-literature
Project description:While its prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa is high, intimate partner violence (IPV) is rarely reported during routine index case testing (ICT) services in Malawi. We retrospectively explored the occurrence of IPV in a large, PEPFAR-supported HIV care and treatment program, among people with HIV (PWH) who had previously accessed ICT services. Between July-August 2022, we enrolled PWH aged ≥18 years, at 15 health facilities, who had received ICT services as new ART-initiators <6 months ago. We used a validated World Health Organization tool to measure IPV in domains of physical, sexual and emotional abuse, and controlling behaviors in the past 12 months. To understand reasons for IPV non-reporting, we randomly selected a sub-set of PWH who had experienced IPV and healthcare workers (HCWs) providing ICT services, for in-depth interviews (IDIs). We enrolled 149 PWH, 71.8% were female, 58.4% married, mean age 34 (IQR 25-40) years. Overall IPV prevalence was 71.1% (95%CI: 63.8%-78.5%), 76.6% (95%CI 68.5%-84.8%) among females and 57.1% (95%CI: 41.5%-72.8%) among males. Controlling behavior (65.7%) was the most common form of IPV, followed by physical (24.8%), emotional (33.6%), and sexual abuse (20.8%). Twenty-two percent related the IPV event to the HIV diagnosis. We analyzed 24 IDIs (15 PWH, 9 HCWs). Only two PWH (13.3%) had reported IPV to a HCW. Major barriers to reporting IPV for PWH were believing it is inappropriate discussing IPV with HCWs, concerns that discussing IPV would cause delays for others, and limited privacy. HCWs attributed IPV non-reporting to insufficient screening, high workload among ICT staff, negative HCW attitudes, and PWH's fear of unintended consequences of IPV reporting. IPV prevalence was high among PWH who had recently undergone ICT, but IPV is often not reported. Multiple barriers to IPV reporting must be addressed urgently, given IPV's adverse impact on HIV treatment and other health outcomes.
| S-EPMC11856312 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Despite significant advances in pediatric HIV treatment, too many children remain undiagnosed and thus without access to lifesaving antiretroviral therapy. It is critical to identify these children and initiate antiretroviral therapy as early as possible. Although the children of HIV-infected adults are at higher risk of infection, few access HIV testing services because of missed opportunities in existing case finding programs. Family testing is an index case finding strategy through which HIV-infected patients are systematically screened to identify family members with unknown HIV status. By specifically targeting a high-risk population, family testing is a pragmatic, high-yield, and efficient approach to identify previously undiagnosed HIV-infected children and link them to care before they become symptomatic. Despite this, incorporation of family testing into national guidelines and implementation of this case finding approach is variable. In this article, we review the evidence base for family testing, describe its challenges, and provide guidance and sample tools for program managers aiming to integrate family testing into existing health systems.
| S-EPMC6047763 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBy testing children and adolescents of HIV positive caretakers, index-linked HIV testing, a targeted HIV testing strategy, has the ability to identify high risk children and adolescents earlier and more efficiently, compared to blanket testing. We evaluated the incremental cost of integrating index-linked HIV testing via three modalities into HIV services in Zimbabwe.MethodsA mixture of bottom-up and top-down costing was employed to estimate the provider cost per test and per HIV diagnosis for 2-18 year olds, through standard of care testing, and the incremental cost of index-linked HIV testing via three modalities: facility-based testing, home-based testing by a healthcare worker, and testing at home by the caregiver using an oral mucosal transudate test. In addition to interviews, direct observation and study process data, facility registries were abstracted to extract outcome data and resource use. Costs were converted to 2019 constant US$.ResultsThe average cost per standard of care test in urban facilities was US$5.91 and US$7.15 at the rural facility. Incremental cost of an index-linked HIV test was driven by the uptake and number of participants tested. The lowest cost approach in the urban setting was home-based testing (US$6.69) and facility-based testing at the rural clinic (US$5.36). Testing by caregivers was almost always the most expensive option (rural US$62.49, urban US$17.49).ConclusionsThis is the first costing analysis of index-linked HIV testing strategies. Unit costs varied across sites and with uptake. When scaling up, alternative testing solutions that increase efficiency such as index-linked HIV testing of the entire household, as opposed to solely targeting children/adolescents, need to be explored.
| S-EPMC8507161 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIt is critical to identify children living with HIV and initiate lifesaving antiretroviral treatment (ART) early. The Pediatric Accelerated Case Finding Effort focused on contact elicitation and HIV testing of ART clients' biological children. We describe HIV testing and seropositivity rates following the initiative and gaps along the index testing cascade to inform pediatric HIV case finding optimization.MethodsThis mixed-methods study involved collecting monthly data on index testing outcomes, including elicitation (identifying biological children < 15 years), HIV testing and linkage to treatment from March 2020 to July 2021 in 35 facilities in Kinshasa. Data were summarized and presented for the first month (as a baseline proxy) and the entire study period. Qualitative data were collected from 14 healthcare workers participating in in-depth interviews and 33 community health workers in four focus group discussions. Audio recordings were transcribed and translated from Lingala or French into English and coded using MAXQDA software. Data were thematically analyzed according pediatric case finding barriers and strategies.ResultsAt baseline (March 2020), among 3337 eligible female index clients, 1634 (49.0%) underwent elicitation to identify children with unknown HIV status. By July 2021, all eligible clients (n = 11,734) had contacts identified. Of the contacts, 9871/11,848 (83.3%) were HIV-tested. Of contacts tested, 662 (6.7%) were diagnosed as HIV-positive, with 535 (80.8%) age 5-14 years; 99.5% initiated treatment. Providers attributed gaps in HIV testing primarily to testing refusals for children due to non-disclosure among parents and logistical or financial obstacles to transportation for tracing. COVID-19 movement restrictions and exposure fears also limited provider interactions for testing. Provider-implemented strategies included transport reimbursement, extensive counseling and alternative approaches to child testing for parents in sero-discordant relationships.ConclusionsFollowing intensified efforts around pediatric case finding, we found a high HIV positivity yield of 6.7% among previously undiagnosed children, with 81% of them aged ≥5 years. While elicitation improved over time, contact tracing for HIV testing remained the largest gap, missing opportunities to reach 17% of undiagnosed children. Ensuring adequate resources for tracing and HIV testing and supporting disclosure among couples, while emphasizing elicitation of ART clients' biological children can help to optimize pediatric case finding.
| S-EPMC10765655 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionGaps in HIV testing of children persist, particularly among older children born before the expansion of the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV programs.MethodsThe Counseling and Testing for Children at Home study evaluated an index-case pediatric HIV testing approach. Caregivers receiving HIV care at 7 health facilities in Kenya (index cases), who had children of unknown HIV status aged 0-12 years, were offered the choice of clinic-based testing (CBT) or home-based testing (HBT). Testing uptake and HIV prevalence were compared between groups choosing HBT and CBT; linkage to care, missed opportunities, and predictors of HIV-positive diagnosis were identified.ResultsAmong 493 caregivers, 70% completed HIV testing for ≥1 child. Most caregivers who tested children chose CBT (266/347, 77%), with 103 (30%) agreeing to same-day testing of an untested accompanying child. Overall HIV prevalence among 521 tested children was 5.8% (CBT 6.8% vs HBT 2.4%; P = 0.07). Within 1 month of diagnosis, 88% of 30 HIV-positive children had linked to care, and 54% had started antiretroviral treatment. For 851 children eligible for testing, the most common reason for having an unknown HIV status was that the child's mother was not tested for HIV or had tested HIV negative during pregnancy (82%).ConclusionTesting uptake and HIV prevalence were moderate with nonsignificant differences between HBT and CBT. Standardized offer to test children accompanying caregivers is feasible to scale-up with little additional investment. Linkage to care for HIV-positive children was suboptimal. Lack of peripartum maternal testing contributed to gaps in pediatric testing.
| S-EPMC9383697 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPediatric HIV testing remains suboptimal. The OraQuick test [saliva-based test (SBT)] is validated in pediatric populations ≥18 months. Understanding caregiver and health care worker (HCW) acceptability of pediatric SBT is critical for implementation.MethodsA trained qualitative interviewer conducted 8 focus group discussions (FGDs): 4 with HCWs and 4 with caregivers of children seeking health services in western Kenya. FGDs explored acceptability of pediatric SBT and home- and facility-based SBT use. Two reviewers conducted consensus coding and thematic analyses of transcripts using Dedoose.ResultsMost HCWs but few caregivers had heard of SBT. Before seeing SBT instructions, both had concerns about potential HIV transmission through saliva, which were mostly alleviated after kit demonstration. Noted benefits of SBT included usability and avoiding finger pricks. Benefits of facility-based pediatric SBT included shorter client waiting and service time, higher testing coverage, and access to HCWs, while noted challenges included ensuring confidentiality. Benefits of caregivers using home-based SBT included convenience, privacy, decreased travel costs, increased testing, easier administration, and child comfort. Perceived challenges included not receiving counseling, disagreements with partners, child neglect, and negative emotional response to a positive test result. Overall, HCWs felt that SBT could be used for pediatric HIV testing but saw limited utility for caregivers performing SBT without an HCW present. Caregivers saw utility in home-based SBT but wanted easy access to counseling in case of a positive test result.ConclusionsSBT was generally acceptable to HCWs and caregivers and is a promising strategy to expand testing coverage.
| S-EPMC9283261 | biostudies-literature