Evaluation of the discriminatory power of typing methods for Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

ABSTRACT: A panel of 18 strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, known to be temporally and geographically diverse, was used to evaluate a number of typing systems, including conventional auxotyping and serotyping and the molecular methods of arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR), amplified ribosomal-DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), opa typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The discriminatory power of the different typing methods were determined with a collection of 87 clinical isolates from commercial sex workers in Indonesia, and Simpson's index of diversity was calculated. Of the two traditional techniques, auxotyping and serotyping, the latter gives the highest discriminatory index (DI) (DI, 0.846). The combination of auxotyping and serotyping yields a high DI (DI, 0. 928). D11344- and D8635-

SUBMITTER: Van Looveren M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC85114 | biostudies-literature | 1999 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature