Dataset Information

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Linaclotide for Patients with Chronic Constipation: A Meta-Analysis and Bayesian Analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

It is ambiguous whether a higher dose of linaclotide provides higher efficacy for chronic constipation (CC) patients. The meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of linaclotide doses ranging from 62.5 μg to 600 μg for CC patients.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted, and STATA16 software was used for data analysis.

Results

Seven studies with 4,107 patients were eligible. A significantly enhanced number of completely spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) responders were found in the extremely low-dose group (OR: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.98-4.34; p < 0.001), the low-dose group (OR: 3.24; 95% CI: 2.44-4.31; p < 0.001), the medium-dose group (OR: 3.08; 95% CI: 1.46-6.50; p=0.003), and high-dose group (OR: 4.79; 95% CI: 3.04-7.54; p < 0.001). Bayesian analysis showed the high-dose group obtained the maximum CSBM responder rate (OR: 4.94; 95% credible interval (CrI): 3.22-7.79; probability rank = 0.87) indirectly compared with extremely low-dose, low-dose, and medium-dose groups. However, no significant difference presented in the CSBM responder rate by pairwise comparisons of the different dose groups. Additionally, no more any adverse events occurred in the higher linaclotide dose group (RR: 0.91; 95% CrI: 0.60-1.38) indirectly compared with other dose groups.

Conclusions

High dose of linaclotide could be more effective and safer for CC patients, which need more trials to confirm in the future.

SUBMITTER: Yang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8531776 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Linaclotide for Patients with Chronic Constipation: A Meta-Analysis and Bayesian Analysis.

Yang Jiao J Lei YanChang Y

Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM 20211014

<h4>Background</h4>It is ambiguous whether a higher dose of linaclotide provides higher efficacy for chronic constipation (CC) patients. The meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of linaclotide doses ranging from 62.5 <i>μ</i>g to 600 <i>μ</i>g for CC patients.<h4>Methods</h4>A comprehensive search was conducted, and STATA16 software was used for data analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Seven studies with 4,107 patients were eligible. A significantly enhanced number of completely spontaneou ...[more]

PMID: 34691232

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: To comprehensively reassess the efficacy and safety of different concentrations of atropine for retarding myopia progression and seek the most appropriate therapeutic concentration for clinical practice. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals (VIP) and China National Knowledege Infrastructure (CNKI) from their inception to 23 March 2023, to obtain eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that had atropine in at least one treatment arm and placebo/no intervention in another arm. We evaluated the risk of bias of the RCTs according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration for RCTs and quality of cohort studies by the Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale. Weighted mean difference (WMD), 95% confidence interval were calculated for meta-analysis. All data analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3, STATA 12.0 and SPSS 26.0 software. Results: A total of 44 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Weighted mean difference (WMD) were 0.73 diopters (D), 0.65 D, 0.35 D per year in refraction progression (χ 2 = 14.63, I 2 = 86.3%; p < 0.001) and -0.26 mm, -0.37 mm, -0.11 mm per year in axial length progression (χ 2 = 5.80, I 2 = 65.5%; p = 0.06) for high (0.5%-1%), moderate (0.1%-0.25%), and low (0.005%-0.05%) dose atropine groups, respectively. Logarithmic dose‒response correlations were found between atropine and their effect on change of refraction, axial length, accommodation and photopic pupil diameter. Through these curves, we found that atropine with concentrations ≤0.05% atropine resulted in a residual value of accommodation of more than 5 D and an increase in pupil diameter no more than 3 mm. Higher doses of atropine resulted in a higher incidence of adverse effects, of which the incidence of photophobia was dose-dependent (r = 0.477, p = 0.029). Conclusion: Both the efficacy and risk of adverse events for atropine treatment of myopia were mostly dose dependent. Comprehensively considered the myopia control effect and safety of each dose, 0.05% may be the best concentration of atropine to control myopia progression at present, at which myopia is better controlled and the side effects are tolerable. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, CRD42022377705.

Project description:BackgroundTo provide evidence for medical management of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) in China based on comparisons of all clinical practical interventions using Bayesian network meta-analysis.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and the Wanfang Database (inception to May 2019) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for CIC in Chinese people. Only RCTs that recruited participants aged over 18 and diagnosed with CIC by the Rome II, III or IV criteria were included. We used three outcomes to examine efficacy. The risk ratio (RR) of the responder rate, based on ≥3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) per week after treatment, was the primary outcome, and the SBM count per week and the Bristol score (BS) were secondary outcomes. In addition, adverse effects (AEs) were also considered a secondary outcome to evaluate safety. We conducted Bayesian network meta-analysis with random effects, and the RR or mean difference with its 95% credible interval was calculated. In addition, we ranked all treatments via their cumulative curves (SUCRA) and assessed the quality of evidence according to the GRADE criteria.ResultsWe included a total of 42 trials (6820 participants) of 20 grouped interventions that included pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. For the primary outcome, fourteen interventions were significantly better than placebo, and Probiotics plus Mosapride (PB + MP) appeared superior to others (GRADE quality of evidence: Moderate to Low), followed by Prucalopride (PP) (High to Low) and Electroacupuncture (EA) (High to Low). For SBM, Compound sodium bicarbonate suppository (CSBS) appeared to be best, with an SUCRA value of 90% (High to Low). For BS, Lactulose plus Probiotics (LT + PB) was superior to others (Moderate to Low), followed by Polyethylene glycol (PEG) (High to Moderate). Although all interventions appeared non-significant when compared with placebo in terms of adverse effects, Lactulose plus Mosapride showed greater risk than others on ranking probability.ConclusionsGiven the GRADE assessment, PB + MP, PP and EA may be the priory options with moderate certainty in the quality of evidence for the primary outcome. For SBM, a CSBS may be the best option with moderate certainty in the quality of evidence. For BS, PEG may be the priory option with high certainty in the quality of evidence. However, due to a lack of high certainty in the quality of evidence, caution is needed when recommending the interventions. Because of the limitations, an increased number of trials are required for more accurate results.

Dataset Information

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Linaclotide for Patients with Chronic Constipation: A Meta-Analysis and Bayesian Analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Linaclotide for Patients with Chronic Constipation: A Meta-Analysis and Bayesian Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets