Dataset Information

A look into retinal organoids: methods, analytical techniques, and applications.

ABSTRACT: Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) cause progressive loss of light-sensitive photoreceptors in the eye and can lead to blindness. Gene-based therapies for IRDs have shown remarkable progress in the past decade, but the vast majority of forms remain untreatable. In the era of personalised medicine, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) emerge as a valuable system for cell replacement and to model IRD because they retain the specific patient genome and can differentiate into any adult cell type. Three-dimensional (3D) iPSCs-derived retina-like tissue called retinal organoid contains all major retina-specific cell types: amacrine, bipolar, horizontal, retinal ganglion cells, Müller glia, as well as rod and cone photoreceptors. Here, we describe the main applications of retinal organoids and provide a comprehensive overview of the state-of-art analysis methods that apply to this model system. Finally, we will discuss the outlook for improvements that would bring the cellular model a step closer to become an established system in research and treatment development of IRDs.

SUBMITTER: Afanasyeva TAV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8558279 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A look into retinal organoids: methods, analytical techniques, and applications.

Afanasyeva Tess A V TAV Corral-Serrano Julio C JC Garanto Alejandro A Roepman Ronald R Cheetham Michael E ME Collin Rob W J RWJ

Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS 20210822 19-20

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) cause progressive loss of light-sensitive photoreceptors in the eye and can lead to blindness. Gene-based therapies for IRDs have shown remarkable progress in the past decade, but the vast majority of forms remain untreatable. In the era of personalised medicine, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) emerge as a valuable system for cell replacement and to model IRD because they retain the specific patient genome and can differentiate into any adult cell type. T ...[more]

PMID: 34420069

Similar Datasets

Project description:Probiotics are the largest non-herbal/traditional dietary supplements category worldwide. To be effective, a probiotic strain must be delivered viable at an adequate dose proven to deliver a health benefit. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the various technologies available for probiotic enumeration, including a general description of each technology, their advantages and limitations, and their potential for the future of the probiotics industry. The current "gold standard" for analytical quantification of probiotics in the probiotic industry is the Plate Count method (PC). PC measures the bacterial cell's ability to proliferate into detectable colonies, thus PC relies on cultivability as a measure of viability. Although viability has widely been measured by cultivability, there has been agreement that the definition of viability is not limited to cultivability. For example, bacterial cells may exist in a state known as viable but not culturable (VBNC) where the cells lose cultivability but can maintain some of the characteristics of viable cells as well as probiotic properties. This led to questioning the association between viability and cultivability and the accuracy of PC in enumerating all the viable cells in probiotic products. PC has always been an estimate of the number of viable cells and not a true cell count. Additionally, newer probiotic categories such as Next Generation Probiotics (NGPs) are difficult to culture in routine laboratories as NGPs are often strict anaerobes with extreme sensitivity to atmospheric oxygen. Thus, accurate quantification using culture-based techniques will be complicated. Another emerging category of biotics is postbiotics, which are inanimate microorganisms, also often referred to as tyndallized or heat-killed bacteria. Obviously, culture dependent methods are not suitable for these products, and alternative methods are needed for their quantification. Different methodologies provide a more complete picture of a heterogeneous bacterial population versus PC focusing exclusively on the eventual multiplication of the cells. Alternative culture-independent techniques including real-time PCR, digital PCR and flow cytometry are discussed. These methods can measure viability beyond cultivability (i.e., by measuring cellular enzymatic activity, membrane integrity or membrane potential), and depending on how they are designed they can achieve strain-specific enumeration.

Project description:Electrical coupling between retinal neurons contributes to the functional complexity of visual circuits. “Cut-loading” methods allow simultaneous assessment of cell-coupling between multiple retinal cell-types, but existing analysis methods impede direct comparison with gold standard direct dye injection techniques. In the current study, we both improved an existing method and developed two new approaches to address observed limitations. Each method of analysis was applied to cut-loaded dark-adapted Guinea pig retinae (n = 29) to assess coupling strength in the axonless horizontal cell type (‘a-type’, aHCs). Method 1 was an improved version of the standard protocol and described the distance of dye-diffusion (space constant). Method 2 adjusted for the geometric path of dye-transfer through cut-loaded cells and extracted the rate of dye-transfer across gap-junctions in terms of the coupling coefficient (kj). Method 3 measured the diffusion coefficient (De) perpendicular to the cut-axis. Dye transfer was measured after one of five diffusion times (1–20 mins), or with a coupling inhibitor, meclofenamic acid (MFA) (50–500μM after 20 mins diffusion). The standard protocol fits an exponential decay function to the fluorescence profile of a specified retina layer but includes non-specific background fluorescence. This was improved by measuring the fluorescence of individual cell soma and excluding from the fit non-horizontal cells located at the cut-edge (p<0.001) (Method 1). The space constant (Method 1) increased with diffusion time (p<0.01), whereas Methods 2 (p = 0.54) and 3 (p = 0.63) produced consistent results across all diffusion times. Adjusting distance by the mean cell-cell spacing within each tissue reduced the incidence of outliers across all three methods. Method 1 was less sensitive to detecting changes induced by MFA than Methods 2 (p<0.01) and 3 (p<0.01). Although the standard protocol was easily improved (Method 1), Methods 2 and 3 proved more sensitive and generalisable; allowing for detailed assessment of the tracer kinetics between different populations of gap-junction linked cell networks and direct comparison to dye-injection techniques.

Dataset Information

A look into retinal organoids: methods, analytical techniques, and applications.

Publications

A look into retinal organoids: methods, analytical techniques, and applications.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets