Dataset Information

Analysis of the efficacy and prognostic factors of PD-1 inhibitors in advanced gallbladder cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is highly malignant, its early diagnosis is difficult, and the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. For patients with advanced GBC (GBCa), combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy are needed to improve the overall survival (OS) rate of patients.

Methods

Data were collected from 53 patients with GBCa who had volunteered to receive programmed death protein-1 (PD-1)-based treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from February 2018 to February 2021. Statistical analysis of the collected data, including Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazard regression model and other methods.

Results

The objective response rates (ORRs) and disease control rates (DCRs) of 53 participants 3 months after receiving immunotherapy were 30.2% and 79.2%, respectively. The ORRs and DCRs of the combined treatment group were higher than those of the camrelizumab group (CG) (P<0.05). The DCRs of the camrelizumab plus apatinib group (CAG) at 3 and 6 months were 90.9% and 45.5% (P=0.003), respectively, while the DCRs at 3 and 6 months of the camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group (CCG) were 85.7% and 71.4% (P=0.450), respectively. After treatment, there were statistically significant differences before and after CA199 for each group (P<0.05). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the 53 participants was 7 months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 12 months. The mPFS and mOS of the CAG and the CCG were greater than those in the CG (6 vs. 3 months, P<0.001, 12 vs. 8 months, P=0.019; 9 vs. 3 months, P<0.001, 13 vs. 8 months, P<0.001, respectively). A total of 16 cases had grade 1 or 2 adverse events, and 3 cases had grade 3 and higher adverse events.

Conclusions

For GBCa patients, PD-1 combined with targeted therapy or chemotherapy is more effective than immunotherapy alone. The targeted therapy group has more obvious early effects on the disease control rate, and combined chemotherapy can achieve sustained effects, providing new ideas for the future GBCa application of immune, targeted, and chemotherapy sequential therapy.

SUBMITTER: Zheng Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8576663 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Analysis of the efficacy and prognostic factors of PD-1 inhibitors in advanced gallbladder cancer.

Zheng Qitong Q Wu Chen C Ye Huangshu H Xu Zhenggang Z Ji Yang Y Rao Jianhua J Lu Ling L Zhu Yaqing Y Cheng Feng F

Annals of translational medicine 20211001 20

<h4>Background</h4>Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is highly malignant, its early diagnosis is difficult, and the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. For patients with advanced GBC (GBCa), combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy are needed to improve the overall survival (OS) rate of patients.<h4>Methods</h4>Data were collected from 53 patients with GBCa who had volunteered to receive programmed death protein-1 (PD-1)-based treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital o ...[more]

PMID: 34790774

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed advanced gastric cancer treatment, yet patient responses vary, highlighting the need for effective biomarkers. Common markers, such as programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), microsatellite instability/mismatch repair (MSI/MMR), tumor mutational burden, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and Epstein-Barr virus, face sampling challenges and high costs. This study seeks practical, minimally invasive biomarkers to enhance patient selection and improve outcomes.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study analyzed 617 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors from January 2019 to March 2023. Clinical data and peripheral blood marker data were collected before and after treatment. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox and LASSO logistic regression analyses identified independent factors for OS, PFS, and ORR. Predictive nomograms were validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, areas under the curve (AUCs), C-indices, and calibration curves, with clinical utility assessed via decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).ResultsOS-related factors included treatment line, T stage, ascites, pretreatment indirect bilirubin (pre-IBIL), posttreatment CA125, CA199, CA724, and the PLR. PFS-related factors included treatment lines, T stage, metastatic sites, pre-IBIL, posttreatment globulin (GLOB), CA125, and CA199 changes. ORR-related factors included treatment line, T stage, N stage, liver metastasis, pretreatment red cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR), CA125, and CA724 changes. The nomograms showed strong predictive performance and clinical utility.ConclusionsEarly treatment, lower T stage, the absence of ascites, and lower pre-IBIL, post-CA125, CA199, CA724, and PLR correlate with better OS. Factors for improved PFS include early treatment, lower T stage, fewer metastatic sites, and lower pre-IBIL, post-GLOB, and post-CA125 levels. Nomogram models can help identify patients who may benefit from immunotherapy, providing valuable clinical guidance.

Project description:BackgroundPD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have emerged as promising therapies for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), but their efficacy and safety profiles require further evaluation. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in this patient population.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with data sourced from PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CNKI up to August 3, 2024. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1680 patients were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR), while safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥ 3 AEs. Effect sizes were calculated using mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsOverall, the meta-analysis showed that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not significantly extend OS (MD = 0.86, 95% CI: -0.55, 2.27), but they significantly improved PFS (MD = 2.53, 95% CI: 0.92, 4.15). Additionally, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not significantly increase the ORR compared to controls (RR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.44). In terms of safety, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors did not significantly increase the incidence of overall AEs. Subgroup analysis further indicated that PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved OS (MD = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.20, 2.29) and PFS (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 0.56, 11.97), while PD-L1 inhibitors did not have a significant impact on these outcomes. Additionally, PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with a higher risk of grade ≥ 3 AEs (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.57), a risk not observed with PD-1 inhibitors.ConclusionPD-1 inhibitors significantly improve PFS and OS in advanced CRC, making them a preferable option over PD-L1 inhibitors, which show limited efficacy and a higher risk of severe AEs. These findings support prioritizing PD-1 inhibitors in clinical practice for this patient group, while caution is warranted with PD-L1 inhibitors due to their safety concerns.Trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42024611696).

Project description:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended as first-line treatment for late-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. However, efficacy and safety comparisons between ICIs as monotherapy and ICIs with chemotherapy are lacking. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials published before February 29th, 2020, with the search terms "immunotherapy" and "chemotherapy". 10 eligible trials were identified with a total of 5,956 patients. Of these patients, 3,204 received immune therapy and 2,752 received chemotherapy. PD-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy improved OS (HR 0.84, 0.77-0.92), PFS (HR 0.80, 0.75-0.85), and objective response rate (ORR) (odds ratio (OR) 2.55, 1.20-5.28) compared to PD-1 inhibitors as monotherapy. In contrast, PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy showed no significant differences in OS, PFS, or ORR compared with PD-L1 inhibitors as monotherapy. When patients were stratified according to PD-L1 expression level, patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50%) receiving PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy had improved PFS, but not other outcomes, compared to PD-1 inhibitors as monotherapy. In these patients, PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy showed no significant difference in survival compared with PD-L1 inhibitors. In the low PD-L1 expression group (1%-49%), PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy improved OS and PFS, but no advantage was observed in PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in OS, PFS, or ORR compared with PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy. When comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy, no significant differences were observed in the rate of immune-related adverse events (AEs). In summary, for treating patients with late-stage NSCLC, PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy have improved efficacy compared with PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy, but PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy have similar efficacy as PD-L1 monotherapy. Survival benefits of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy were particularly significant in patients with low PD-L1 expression levels.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42020166678 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=166678).

Project description:BackgroundThe combination of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors with chemotherapy (CT) is currently under evaluation as a first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). This study sought to assess the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic combination in patients with advanced or recurrent EC.MethodsWe performed an exhaustive review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 25, 2024, examining the efficacy and safety of combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CT versus CT alone (or plus placebo) in advanced or recurrent EC. Efficacy was measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while safety was assessed by the incidence of any grade or grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS, as well as risk ratios (RRs) for AEs, each accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To evaluate heterogeneity, we employed Cochran's Q test, I2 statistics, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted using R Version 4.3.1, STATA Version 12.0, and TSA Version 0.9.5.10 Beta software.ResultsOur analysis incorporated 6 studies, encompassing a total of 2,954 patients. The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CT significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.617, 95% CI: 0.506-0.752; 95% PI: 0.334-1.140) and OS (HR = 0.774, 95% CI: 0.664-0.902; 95% PI: 0.553-1.083) compared to CT alone (or plus placebo) in the overall population. Subgroup analysis based on mismatch repair (MMR) status revealed pronounced benefits in PFS and OS for patients with deficient MMR (dMMR) (PFS: HR = 0.344, 95% CI: 0.269-0.438; 95% PI: 0.231-0.510; OS: HR = 0.371, 95% CI: 0.245-0.562; 95% PI: 0.025-5.461) compared to those with proficient MMR (pMMR) (PFS: HR = 0.772, 95% CI: 0.627-0.950; 95% PI: 0.394-1.512; OS: HR = 0.996, 95% CI: 0.692-1.435; 95% PI: 0.021-47.662). Although there was no observed difference in the incidence of any grades AEs (RR = 0.994, 95% CI: 0.982-1.006; 95% PI: 0.978-1.009), the risk of grade ≥ 3 AEs was elevated in the group receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in combination with CT (RR = 1.132, 95% CI: 1.023-1.252; 95% PI: 0.836-1.532).ConclusionThe combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with CT significantly improved PFS and OS in advanced or recurrent EC patients, with particularly pronounced benefits observed in those with dMMR. Clinicians can tailor treatment strategies according to individual patient characteristics to optimize therapeutic outcomes, while remaining alert to the possibility of AEs in clinical practice.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024595455.

Dataset Information

Analysis of the efficacy and prognostic factors of PD-1 inhibitors in advanced gallbladder cancer.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Analysis of the efficacy and prognostic factors of PD-1 inhibitors in advanced gallbladder cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets